Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hungria,Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Allen,Syreeta, Kampanis,Petros, Soares,Elyara Maria
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000100037
Resumo: Abstract The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma is a challenge to the physician due to the non-specific symptoms (anemia, bone pain and recurrent infections) that are commonplace in the elderly population. However, early diagnosis is associated with less severe disease, including fewer patients presenting with acute renal injury, pathological fractures and severe anemia. Since 2006, the serum free light chain test Freelite® has been included alongside standard laboratory tests (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and serum and urine immunofixation) as an aid in the identification of monoclonal proteins, which are a cornerstone for the diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. The serum free light chain assay recognizes the light chain component of the immunoglobulin in its free form with high sensitivity. Other assays that measure light chains in the free and intact immunoglobulin forms are sensitive, but unfortunately, due to the nomenclature used, these assays (total light chains) are sometimes used in place of the free light chain assay. This paper reviews the available literature comparing the two assays and tries to clarify hypothetical limitations of the total assay to detect Multiple Myeloma. Furthermore, we elaborate on our study comparing the two assays used in 11 Light Chain Multiple Myeloma patients at presentation and 103 patients taken through the course of their disease. The aim of this article is to provide a clear discrimination between the two assays and to provide information to physicians and laboratory technicians so that they can utilize the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines.
id ABHHTC-1_30ad85dc51c3494924e07dcf6a85cd7d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-84842016000100037
network_acronym_str ABHHTC-1
network_name_str Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal GammopathiesFreelite®Serum free light chain assayTotal light chain assayMultiple myelomaAbstract The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma is a challenge to the physician due to the non-specific symptoms (anemia, bone pain and recurrent infections) that are commonplace in the elderly population. However, early diagnosis is associated with less severe disease, including fewer patients presenting with acute renal injury, pathological fractures and severe anemia. Since 2006, the serum free light chain test Freelite® has been included alongside standard laboratory tests (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and serum and urine immunofixation) as an aid in the identification of monoclonal proteins, which are a cornerstone for the diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. The serum free light chain assay recognizes the light chain component of the immunoglobulin in its free form with high sensitivity. Other assays that measure light chains in the free and intact immunoglobulin forms are sensitive, but unfortunately, due to the nomenclature used, these assays (total light chains) are sometimes used in place of the free light chain assay. This paper reviews the available literature comparing the two assays and tries to clarify hypothetical limitations of the total assay to detect Multiple Myeloma. Furthermore, we elaborate on our study comparing the two assays used in 11 Light Chain Multiple Myeloma patients at presentation and 103 patients taken through the course of their disease. The aim of this article is to provide a clear discrimination between the two assays and to provide information to physicians and laboratory technicians so that they can utilize the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines.Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular2016-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000100037Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.38 n.1 2016reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)instacron:ABHHTC10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.11.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHungria,Vania Tietsche de MoraesAllen,SyreetaKampanis,PetrosSoares,Elyara Mariaeng2016-03-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-84842016000100037Revistahttp://www.rbhh.org/pt/archivo/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpsbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org1806-08701516-8484opendoar:2016-03-22T00:00Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
title Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
spellingShingle Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
Hungria,Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Freelite®
Serum free light chain assay
Total light chain assay
Multiple myeloma
title_short Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
title_full Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
title_fullStr Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
title_full_unstemmed Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
title_sort Serum free light chain assays not total light chain assays are the standard of care to assess Monoclonal Gammopathies
author Hungria,Vania Tietsche de Moraes
author_facet Hungria,Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Allen,Syreeta
Kampanis,Petros
Soares,Elyara Maria
author_role author
author2 Allen,Syreeta
Kampanis,Petros
Soares,Elyara Maria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hungria,Vania Tietsche de Moraes
Allen,Syreeta
Kampanis,Petros
Soares,Elyara Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Freelite®
Serum free light chain assay
Total light chain assay
Multiple myeloma
topic Freelite®
Serum free light chain assay
Total light chain assay
Multiple myeloma
description Abstract The diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma is a challenge to the physician due to the non-specific symptoms (anemia, bone pain and recurrent infections) that are commonplace in the elderly population. However, early diagnosis is associated with less severe disease, including fewer patients presenting with acute renal injury, pathological fractures and severe anemia. Since 2006, the serum free light chain test Freelite® has been included alongside standard laboratory tests (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, and serum and urine immunofixation) as an aid in the identification of monoclonal proteins, which are a cornerstone for the diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. The serum free light chain assay recognizes the light chain component of the immunoglobulin in its free form with high sensitivity. Other assays that measure light chains in the free and intact immunoglobulin forms are sensitive, but unfortunately, due to the nomenclature used, these assays (total light chains) are sometimes used in place of the free light chain assay. This paper reviews the available literature comparing the two assays and tries to clarify hypothetical limitations of the total assay to detect Multiple Myeloma. Furthermore, we elaborate on our study comparing the two assays used in 11 Light Chain Multiple Myeloma patients at presentation and 103 patients taken through the course of their disease. The aim of this article is to provide a clear discrimination between the two assays and to provide information to physicians and laboratory technicians so that they can utilize the International Myeloma Working Group guidelines.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000100037
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-84842016000100037
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.11.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia v.38 n.1 2016
reponame:Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
instacron:ABHHTC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
instacron_str ABHHTC
institution ABHHTC
reponame_str Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
collection Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular (ABHHTC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv sbhh@terra.com.br||secretaria@rbhh.org
_version_ 1754213112793268224