Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942016000300326 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Perceptual evaluation is considered the gold standard to evaluate speech nasality. Several procedures are used to collect and analyze perceptual data, which makes it susceptible to errors. Therefore, there has been an increasing desire to find methods that can improve the assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the results of speech nasality obtained by assessments of live speech, the Test of Hypernasality (THYPER), assessments of audio recorded speech, and nasometry. METHODS: A retrospective study consisting of 331 patients with operated unilateral cleft lip and palate. Speech nasality was assessed by four methods of assessment: live perceptual judgement, THYPER, audio-recorded speech sample judgement by multiple judges, and nasometry. All data were collected from medical records of patients, with the exception of the speech sample recording assessment, which was carried out by multiple judges. RESULTS: The results showed that the highest percentages of absence of hypernasality were obtained from judgements performed live and from the THYPER, with equal results between them (79%). Lower percentages were obtained from the recordings by judges (66%) and from nasometry (57%). CONCLUSION: The best results among the four speech nasality evaluation methods were obtained for the ones performed live (live nasality judgement by a speech pathologist and THYPER). |
id |
ABORL-F-1_528de79d75b73f8a058de42907089512 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-86942016000300326 |
network_acronym_str |
ABORL-F-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palateCleft palateSpeechSpeech production measurementDiagnosisVelopharyngeal insufficiencyABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Perceptual evaluation is considered the gold standard to evaluate speech nasality. Several procedures are used to collect and analyze perceptual data, which makes it susceptible to errors. Therefore, there has been an increasing desire to find methods that can improve the assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the results of speech nasality obtained by assessments of live speech, the Test of Hypernasality (THYPER), assessments of audio recorded speech, and nasometry. METHODS: A retrospective study consisting of 331 patients with operated unilateral cleft lip and palate. Speech nasality was assessed by four methods of assessment: live perceptual judgement, THYPER, audio-recorded speech sample judgement by multiple judges, and nasometry. All data were collected from medical records of patients, with the exception of the speech sample recording assessment, which was carried out by multiple judges. RESULTS: The results showed that the highest percentages of absence of hypernasality were obtained from judgements performed live and from the THYPER, with equal results between them (79%). Lower percentages were obtained from the recordings by judges (66%) and from nasometry (57%). CONCLUSION: The best results among the four speech nasality evaluation methods were obtained for the ones performed live (live nasality judgement by a speech pathologist and THYPER).Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942016000300326Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.82 n.3 2016reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngologyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)instacron:ABORL-CCF10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.05.017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLarangeira,Fabiane RodriguesDutka,Jeniffer de Cássia RilloWhitaker,Melina EvangelistaSouza,Olívia Mesquita Vieira deLauris,José Roberto PereiraSilva,Mariana Jales Felix daPegoraro-Krook,Maria Inêseng2016-06-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-86942016000300326Revistahttp://www.bjorl.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br1808-86861808-8686opendoar:2016-06-27T00:00Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
title |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
spellingShingle |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate Larangeira,Fabiane Rodrigues Cleft palate Speech Speech production measurement Diagnosis Velopharyngeal insufficiency |
title_short |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
title_full |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
title_fullStr |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
title_sort |
Speech nasality and nasometry in cleft lip and palate |
author |
Larangeira,Fabiane Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Larangeira,Fabiane Rodrigues Dutka,Jeniffer de Cássia Rillo Whitaker,Melina Evangelista Souza,Olívia Mesquita Vieira de Lauris,José Roberto Pereira Silva,Mariana Jales Felix da Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dutka,Jeniffer de Cássia Rillo Whitaker,Melina Evangelista Souza,Olívia Mesquita Vieira de Lauris,José Roberto Pereira Silva,Mariana Jales Felix da Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Larangeira,Fabiane Rodrigues Dutka,Jeniffer de Cássia Rillo Whitaker,Melina Evangelista Souza,Olívia Mesquita Vieira de Lauris,José Roberto Pereira Silva,Mariana Jales Felix da Pegoraro-Krook,Maria Inês |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cleft palate Speech Speech production measurement Diagnosis Velopharyngeal insufficiency |
topic |
Cleft palate Speech Speech production measurement Diagnosis Velopharyngeal insufficiency |
description |
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Perceptual evaluation is considered the gold standard to evaluate speech nasality. Several procedures are used to collect and analyze perceptual data, which makes it susceptible to errors. Therefore, there has been an increasing desire to find methods that can improve the assessment. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the results of speech nasality obtained by assessments of live speech, the Test of Hypernasality (THYPER), assessments of audio recorded speech, and nasometry. METHODS: A retrospective study consisting of 331 patients with operated unilateral cleft lip and palate. Speech nasality was assessed by four methods of assessment: live perceptual judgement, THYPER, audio-recorded speech sample judgement by multiple judges, and nasometry. All data were collected from medical records of patients, with the exception of the speech sample recording assessment, which was carried out by multiple judges. RESULTS: The results showed that the highest percentages of absence of hypernasality were obtained from judgements performed live and from the THYPER, with equal results between them (79%). Lower percentages were obtained from the recordings by judges (66%) and from nasometry (57%). CONCLUSION: The best results among the four speech nasality evaluation methods were obtained for the ones performed live (live nasality judgement by a speech pathologist and THYPER). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942016000300326 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-86942016000300326 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.05.017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology v.82 n.3 2016 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology instname:Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) instacron:ABORL-CCF |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) |
instacron_str |
ABORL-CCF |
institution |
ABORL-CCF |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial (ABORL-CCF) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@aborlccf.org.br||revista@aborlccf.org.br |
_version_ |
1754575991813963776 |