O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares,Sergei Suarez Dillon
Data de Publicação: 2010
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Economia Política
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000300001
Resumo: The rhythm in the fall of inequality in Brazil is acceptable? Evidences of the historical and international context. The following study uses two approaches to answer the question of whether inequality in Brazil is falling fast enough. The first is to compare the variation of the Gini coefficient in Brazil with what was observed in several countries that today belong to the OCDE (United Kingdom, United States, Netherlands, Sweden, France, Norway, and Spain) while these same countries built their social welfare systems during the last century. The second approach is to calculate for how much Brazil must keep up the fall in the Gini coefficient to attain the same levels of inequality of three OCDE countries that can be used as a reference: Mexico, the United States, and Canada. The data indicate that the Gini coefficient in Brazil is falling 0.7 point per year and that this is superior to the rhythm of all the OCDE countries analyzed while they built their welfare systems but Spain, whose Gini fell 0.9 point per year during the 1950s. The time needed to attain various benchmarks in inequality are: 6 years to Mexico, 12 to the United States and 24 to Canadian inequality levels. The general conclusion is that the speed with which inequality is falling is adequate, but the challenge will be to keep inequality falling at the same rate for another two or three decades.
id EDITORA_34-1_a3d7971a6b0cc6557d331ee575e06ce5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-31572010000300001
network_acronym_str EDITORA_34-1
network_name_str Revista de Economia Política
repository_id_str
spelling O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?inequalityincome distributioninternational comparissonsThe rhythm in the fall of inequality in Brazil is acceptable? Evidences of the historical and international context. The following study uses two approaches to answer the question of whether inequality in Brazil is falling fast enough. The first is to compare the variation of the Gini coefficient in Brazil with what was observed in several countries that today belong to the OCDE (United Kingdom, United States, Netherlands, Sweden, France, Norway, and Spain) while these same countries built their social welfare systems during the last century. The second approach is to calculate for how much Brazil must keep up the fall in the Gini coefficient to attain the same levels of inequality of three OCDE countries that can be used as a reference: Mexico, the United States, and Canada. The data indicate that the Gini coefficient in Brazil is falling 0.7 point per year and that this is superior to the rhythm of all the OCDE countries analyzed while they built their welfare systems but Spain, whose Gini fell 0.9 point per year during the 1950s. The time needed to attain various benchmarks in inequality are: 6 years to Mexico, 12 to the United States and 24 to Canadian inequality levels. The general conclusion is that the speed with which inequality is falling is adequate, but the challenge will be to keep inequality falling at the same rate for another two or three decades.Centro de Economia Política2010-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000300001Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.30 n.3 2010reponame:Revista de Economia Políticainstname:EDITORA 34instacron:EDITORA_3410.1590/S0101-31572010000300001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSoares,Sergei Suarez Dillonpor2018-08-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-31572010000300001Revistahttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journalONGhttps://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/oai||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br1809-45380101-3157opendoar:2018-08-14T00:00Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
title O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
spellingShingle O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
Soares,Sergei Suarez Dillon
inequality
income distribution
international comparissons
title_short O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
title_full O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
title_fullStr O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
title_full_unstemmed O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
title_sort O ritmo na queda da desigualdade no Brasil é aceitável?
author Soares,Sergei Suarez Dillon
author_facet Soares,Sergei Suarez Dillon
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares,Sergei Suarez Dillon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv inequality
income distribution
international comparissons
topic inequality
income distribution
international comparissons
description The rhythm in the fall of inequality in Brazil is acceptable? Evidences of the historical and international context. The following study uses two approaches to answer the question of whether inequality in Brazil is falling fast enough. The first is to compare the variation of the Gini coefficient in Brazil with what was observed in several countries that today belong to the OCDE (United Kingdom, United States, Netherlands, Sweden, France, Norway, and Spain) while these same countries built their social welfare systems during the last century. The second approach is to calculate for how much Brazil must keep up the fall in the Gini coefficient to attain the same levels of inequality of three OCDE countries that can be used as a reference: Mexico, the United States, and Canada. The data indicate that the Gini coefficient in Brazil is falling 0.7 point per year and that this is superior to the rhythm of all the OCDE countries analyzed while they built their welfare systems but Spain, whose Gini fell 0.9 point per year during the 1950s. The time needed to attain various benchmarks in inequality are: 6 years to Mexico, 12 to the United States and 24 to Canadian inequality levels. The general conclusion is that the speed with which inequality is falling is adequate, but the challenge will be to keep inequality falling at the same rate for another two or three decades.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000300001
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-31572010000300001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-31572010000300001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Economia Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Political Economy v.30 n.3 2010
reponame:Revista de Economia Política
instname:EDITORA 34
instacron:EDITORA_34
instname_str EDITORA 34
instacron_str EDITORA_34
institution EDITORA_34
reponame_str Revista de Economia Política
collection Revista de Economia Política
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Política - EDITORA 34
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cecilia.heise@bjpe.org.br
_version_ 1754122480760389633