Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gomes, Caio Macret, Lago, Bruno Cocco, Oliveira, Silas Maciel de, Pierozan Junior, Clovis, Favarin, José Laércio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111
Resumo: The objective of this work was to evaluate methods of intercropping corn and Panicum spp. forages and their effects on corn yield and forage development. Two experiments with Panicum spp. were conducted, one with 'Tanzania' and other with 'Massai' in the municipality of Piracicaba, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in the 2012/2013 growing season. In both experiments, the treatments were: broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. at the same time of corn sowing; corn with Panicum spp. between rows; Panicum spp. sown with fertilizer; Panicum spp. sown between corn rows after corn establishment; broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. after corn establishment; and sole corn sowing. For corn, leaf nitrogen content, ear height, and grain yield were evaluated. For Panicum spp. cultivars, height, dry mass, tiller density, and leaf:stem ratio were evaluated. The intercropping establishment methods used do not affect corn growth, grain yield, and N leaf content. The seeding of both cultivars of Panicum spp. when corn plants had four expanded leaves reduces forage dry mass production and increases the leaf:stem ratio. The Panicum spp. broadcast method, performed after corn was established, does not allow appropriate establishment, with few plants in the area.
id EMBRAPA-4_294f4146fa8ce87e04e21cb558dca8d3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/24111
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximumProdutividade de milho, produção e qualidade de forragem afetadas pelos métodos de consórcio do milho com Panicum maximumZea mays; guinea grass; interspecific competition; tropical perennial grassZea mays; capim 'Tanzania'; competição interespecífica; gramínea perene tropicalThe objective of this work was to evaluate methods of intercropping corn and Panicum spp. forages and their effects on corn yield and forage development. Two experiments with Panicum spp. were conducted, one with 'Tanzania' and other with 'Massai' in the municipality of Piracicaba, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in the 2012/2013 growing season. In both experiments, the treatments were: broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. at the same time of corn sowing; corn with Panicum spp. between rows; Panicum spp. sown with fertilizer; Panicum spp. sown between corn rows after corn establishment; broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. after corn establishment; and sole corn sowing. For corn, leaf nitrogen content, ear height, and grain yield were evaluated. For Panicum spp. cultivars, height, dry mass, tiller density, and leaf:stem ratio were evaluated. The intercropping establishment methods used do not affect corn growth, grain yield, and N leaf content. The seeding of both cultivars of Panicum spp. when corn plants had four expanded leaves reduces forage dry mass production and increases the leaf:stem ratio. The Panicum spp. broadcast method, performed after corn was established, does not allow appropriate establishment, with few plants in the area.O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar métodos de implantação do consórcio milho e espécies forrageiras de Panicum spp. e os efeitos na produtividade do milho e no desenvolvimento das forragens. Dois experimentos com Panicum spp. foram conduzidos, um com 'Tanzania' e outro com 'Massai' em Piracicaba, SP, na safra 2012/2013. Em ambos os experimentos, os tratamentos foram: Panicum spp. semeado a lanço no momento da semeadura do milho; milho com Panicum spp. nas entrelinhas; Panicum spp. semeado com fertilizante; Panicum spp. semeado nas entrelinhas depois do estabelecimento do milho; Panicum spp. semeado a lanço depois do estabelecimento do milho; e milho solteiro. Para o milho, avaliaram-se a concentração de nitrogênio foliar, a altura de espigas e a produtividade de grãos. Para as cultivares de Panicum spp., avaliaram-se altura, massa seca, número de perfilhos e relação folha:colmo. Os métodos de implantação do consórcio avaliados não afetam o crescimento, a produtividade de grãos e a concentração foliar de N do milho. A implantação das cultivares de Panicum spp., quando o milho apresenta quatro folhas expandidas, reduz a massa seca e aumenta a relação folha:colmo das plantas forrageiras. A semeadura a lanço de Panicum spp., depois do estabelecimento do milho, não permite o estabelecimento adequado, com poucas plantas na área.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp)Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz deGomes, Caio MacretLago, Bruno CoccoOliveira, Silas Maciel dePierozan Junior, ClovisFavarin, José Laércio2017-04-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.52, n.3, mar. 2017; 170-176Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.52, n.3, mar. 2017; 170-1761678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111/13726Direitos autorais 2017 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-20T17:41:19Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/24111Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2017-04-20T17:41:19Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
Produtividade de milho, produção e qualidade de forragem afetadas pelos métodos de consórcio do milho com Panicum maximum
title Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
spellingShingle Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de
Zea mays; guinea grass; interspecific competition; tropical perennial grass
Zea mays; capim 'Tanzania'; competição interespecífica; gramínea perene tropical
title_short Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
title_full Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
title_fullStr Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
title_full_unstemmed Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
title_sort Corn yield, forage production and quality affected by methods of intercropping corn and Panicum maximum
author Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de
author_facet Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de
Gomes, Caio Macret
Lago, Bruno Cocco
Oliveira, Silas Maciel de
Pierozan Junior, Clovis
Favarin, José Laércio
author_role author
author2 Gomes, Caio Macret
Lago, Bruno Cocco
Oliveira, Silas Maciel de
Pierozan Junior, Clovis
Favarin, José Laércio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (Fapesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Almeida, Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de
Gomes, Caio Macret
Lago, Bruno Cocco
Oliveira, Silas Maciel de
Pierozan Junior, Clovis
Favarin, José Laércio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zea mays; guinea grass; interspecific competition; tropical perennial grass
Zea mays; capim 'Tanzania'; competição interespecífica; gramínea perene tropical
topic Zea mays; guinea grass; interspecific competition; tropical perennial grass
Zea mays; capim 'Tanzania'; competição interespecífica; gramínea perene tropical
description The objective of this work was to evaluate methods of intercropping corn and Panicum spp. forages and their effects on corn yield and forage development. Two experiments with Panicum spp. were conducted, one with 'Tanzania' and other with 'Massai' in the municipality of Piracicaba, in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in the 2012/2013 growing season. In both experiments, the treatments were: broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. at the same time of corn sowing; corn with Panicum spp. between rows; Panicum spp. sown with fertilizer; Panicum spp. sown between corn rows after corn establishment; broadcast seeding of Panicum spp. after corn establishment; and sole corn sowing. For corn, leaf nitrogen content, ear height, and grain yield were evaluated. For Panicum spp. cultivars, height, dry mass, tiller density, and leaf:stem ratio were evaluated. The intercropping establishment methods used do not affect corn growth, grain yield, and N leaf content. The seeding of both cultivars of Panicum spp. when corn plants had four expanded leaves reduces forage dry mass production and increases the leaf:stem ratio. The Panicum spp. broadcast method, performed after corn was established, does not allow appropriate establishment, with few plants in the area.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/24111/13726
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.52, n.3, mar. 2017; 170-176
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.52, n.3, mar. 2017; 170-176
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416706850291712