Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122012000300012 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to evaluate the social impacts of the Tourism Development Program (Prodetur) in the northeastern town of Porto Seguro, Bahia, Brazil. The method used is based on the difference in difference technique applied to the 1991 and 2000 Census microdata. The results suggest social advances following from poverty relief based on income - where the benefits are distributed, generally, in a relatively equal manner between the native and migrant population. There is a relative deterioration in the sanitary situation, which consists of a very serious problem in the mid- and long-term, whose costs are mostly borne by the native population. Therefore, maintaining the natural capital is the main aspect that distances Porto Seguros tourism supply from the concept of sustainability. The article also relies on difference in difference estimators to assess the impacts of local public policies related to the sector. |
id |
FGV-4_606c7a4c9dc5e82636451beab3eb26c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-76122012000300012 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazilsustainable tourismpovertyprogramme evaluationdifference in differencepublic policiesThis paper aims to evaluate the social impacts of the Tourism Development Program (Prodetur) in the northeastern town of Porto Seguro, Bahia, Brazil. The method used is based on the difference in difference technique applied to the 1991 and 2000 Census microdata. The results suggest social advances following from poverty relief based on income - where the benefits are distributed, generally, in a relatively equal manner between the native and migrant population. There is a relative deterioration in the sanitary situation, which consists of a very serious problem in the mid- and long-term, whose costs are mostly borne by the native population. Therefore, maintaining the natural capital is the main aspect that distances Porto Seguros tourism supply from the concept of sustainability. The article also relies on difference in difference estimators to assess the impacts of local public policies related to the sector.Fundação Getulio Vargas2012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122012000300012Revista de Administração Pública v.46 n.3 2012reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGV10.1590/S0034-76122012000300012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeri,Marcelo CortesSoares,Wagner Lopeseng2012-06-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-76122012000300012Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2012-06-22T00:00Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
title |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil Neri,Marcelo Cortes sustainable tourism poverty programme evaluation difference in difference public policies |
title_short |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
title_full |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
title_sort |
Sustainable Tourism and Eradication of Poverty (Step): impact assessment of a tourism development program in Brazil |
author |
Neri,Marcelo Cortes |
author_facet |
Neri,Marcelo Cortes Soares,Wagner Lopes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Soares,Wagner Lopes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neri,Marcelo Cortes Soares,Wagner Lopes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sustainable tourism poverty programme evaluation difference in difference public policies |
topic |
sustainable tourism poverty programme evaluation difference in difference public policies |
description |
This paper aims to evaluate the social impacts of the Tourism Development Program (Prodetur) in the northeastern town of Porto Seguro, Bahia, Brazil. The method used is based on the difference in difference technique applied to the 1991 and 2000 Census microdata. The results suggest social advances following from poverty relief based on income - where the benefits are distributed, generally, in a relatively equal manner between the native and migrant population. There is a relative deterioration in the sanitary situation, which consists of a very serious problem in the mid- and long-term, whose costs are mostly borne by the native population. Therefore, maintaining the natural capital is the main aspect that distances Porto Seguros tourism supply from the concept of sustainability. The article also relies on difference in difference estimators to assess the impacts of local public policies related to the sector. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122012000300012 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122012000300012 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0034-76122012000300012 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública v.46 n.3 2012 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1754115790417690624 |