Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camargo,Samira Esteves Afonso
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Milhan,Noala Vicensoto Moreira, Saraiva,Fernanda de Oliveira, Oliveira,Jonatas Rafael de, Oliveira,Luciane Dias de, Camargo,Carlos Henrique Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000500604
Resumo: Abstract The aims of this study were evaluate cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, antimicrobial activity of desensitizing toothpastes compared to a common one and the surface roughness of tooth enamel submitted to brushing with these toothpastes. Samples of three desensitizing toothpastes (Colgate Sensitive, Sensodyne and Oral B Sensitive) and common toothpaste (Colgate) were placed in contact with gingival human fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity and genotoxocity were measured by MTT assay and micronucleus test. Antimicrobial activity of the toothpastes extracts against C. albicans, S. mutans and S. aureus were assessed. For surface roughness evaluation, bovine teeth were submitted to 10.000 brushing cycles. The results were analyzed statically using Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA and Z tests (p<0.05). All toothpastes caused cytotoxic effect to the cells (p<0.05), except Colgate Sensitive. The toothpastes did not increase the number of micronuclei compared to the untreated control group. Colgate eliminated all the evaluated microorganisms at lower concentrations compared to Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, which were not able to eliminate S. aureus. Sensodyne did not reach the minimum microbicidal concentration. The surface roughness of tooth enamel increased after brushing with Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, however the comparison between groups showed no difference on the enamel surface roughness presented by desensitizing toothpastes when compared with the common one (p>0.05). Based on these results, we can conclude that although none toothpaste has induced genotoxicity, Colgate Sensitive was also not cytotoxic. Colgate was the most effective against the microorganisms, and there were no differences on the enamel surface roughness between the groups.
id FUNORP-1_1408e4a9d7b460718593a3eaad4ab293
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402017000500604
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?toothpastesdesensitizingbiocompatibilityantimicrobialroughness.Abstract The aims of this study were evaluate cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, antimicrobial activity of desensitizing toothpastes compared to a common one and the surface roughness of tooth enamel submitted to brushing with these toothpastes. Samples of three desensitizing toothpastes (Colgate Sensitive, Sensodyne and Oral B Sensitive) and common toothpaste (Colgate) were placed in contact with gingival human fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity and genotoxocity were measured by MTT assay and micronucleus test. Antimicrobial activity of the toothpastes extracts against C. albicans, S. mutans and S. aureus were assessed. For surface roughness evaluation, bovine teeth were submitted to 10.000 brushing cycles. The results were analyzed statically using Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA and Z tests (p<0.05). All toothpastes caused cytotoxic effect to the cells (p<0.05), except Colgate Sensitive. The toothpastes did not increase the number of micronuclei compared to the untreated control group. Colgate eliminated all the evaluated microorganisms at lower concentrations compared to Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, which were not able to eliminate S. aureus. Sensodyne did not reach the minimum microbicidal concentration. The surface roughness of tooth enamel increased after brushing with Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, however the comparison between groups showed no difference on the enamel surface roughness presented by desensitizing toothpastes when compared with the common one (p>0.05). Based on these results, we can conclude that although none toothpaste has induced genotoxicity, Colgate Sensitive was also not cytotoxic. Colgate was the most effective against the microorganisms, and there were no differences on the enamel surface roughness between the groups.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000500604Brazilian Dental Journal v.28 n.5 2017reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201701413info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamargo,Samira Esteves AfonsoMilhan,Noala Vicensoto MoreiraSaraiva,Fernanda de OliveiraOliveira,Jonatas Rafael deOliveira,Luciane Dias deCamargo,Carlos Henrique Ribeiroeng2017-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402017000500604Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2017-11-17T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
title Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
spellingShingle Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
Camargo,Samira Esteves Afonso
toothpastes
desensitizing
biocompatibility
antimicrobial
roughness.
title_short Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
title_full Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
title_fullStr Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
title_full_unstemmed Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
title_sort Are Desensitizing Toothpastes Equally Biocompatible and Effective Against Microorganisms?
author Camargo,Samira Esteves Afonso
author_facet Camargo,Samira Esteves Afonso
Milhan,Noala Vicensoto Moreira
Saraiva,Fernanda de Oliveira
Oliveira,Jonatas Rafael de
Oliveira,Luciane Dias de
Camargo,Carlos Henrique Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Milhan,Noala Vicensoto Moreira
Saraiva,Fernanda de Oliveira
Oliveira,Jonatas Rafael de
Oliveira,Luciane Dias de
Camargo,Carlos Henrique Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camargo,Samira Esteves Afonso
Milhan,Noala Vicensoto Moreira
Saraiva,Fernanda de Oliveira
Oliveira,Jonatas Rafael de
Oliveira,Luciane Dias de
Camargo,Carlos Henrique Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv toothpastes
desensitizing
biocompatibility
antimicrobial
roughness.
topic toothpastes
desensitizing
biocompatibility
antimicrobial
roughness.
description Abstract The aims of this study were evaluate cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, antimicrobial activity of desensitizing toothpastes compared to a common one and the surface roughness of tooth enamel submitted to brushing with these toothpastes. Samples of three desensitizing toothpastes (Colgate Sensitive, Sensodyne and Oral B Sensitive) and common toothpaste (Colgate) were placed in contact with gingival human fibroblasts. Cytotoxicity and genotoxocity were measured by MTT assay and micronucleus test. Antimicrobial activity of the toothpastes extracts against C. albicans, S. mutans and S. aureus were assessed. For surface roughness evaluation, bovine teeth were submitted to 10.000 brushing cycles. The results were analyzed statically using Mann-Whitney U, ANOVA and Z tests (p<0.05). All toothpastes caused cytotoxic effect to the cells (p<0.05), except Colgate Sensitive. The toothpastes did not increase the number of micronuclei compared to the untreated control group. Colgate eliminated all the evaluated microorganisms at lower concentrations compared to Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, which were not able to eliminate S. aureus. Sensodyne did not reach the minimum microbicidal concentration. The surface roughness of tooth enamel increased after brushing with Colgate Sensitive and Oral B Sensitive, however the comparison between groups showed no difference on the enamel surface roughness presented by desensitizing toothpastes when compared with the common one (p>0.05). Based on these results, we can conclude that although none toothpaste has induced genotoxicity, Colgate Sensitive was also not cytotoxic. Colgate was the most effective against the microorganisms, and there were no differences on the enamel surface roughness between the groups.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000500604
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402017000500604
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201701413
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.28 n.5 2017
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204094863507456