Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sorgini,Danilo Balero
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da, Muglia,Valdir Antônio, Souza,Raphael Freitas de, Arruda,Carolina Noronha Ferraz de, Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300292
Resumo: This study evaluated the abrasiveness of mechanical and combined methods of denture hygiene, by the analysis of mass loss and surface roughness. Acrylic resin specimens (Plexiglass) were brushed by a tooth brushing machine (Mavtec) with a soft brush (Tek) and water (control) or four dentifrices (Sorriso, Colgate, Polident and Corega) (Experimental groups) for 50 min, representing one year of brushing (mechanical method). After brushing, the specimens were immersed in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite simulating a daily cleaning of 20 min for one year (combined method). Distilled water (23 ºC) was employed as control. The mass loss (g) was analyzed by an analytical balance and the surface roughness (μm) by a rugosimeter. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α=0.05). Polident dentifrice showed lowest values of mass loss for both methods (mechanical: -0.0072±0.0017, combined:-0.011±0.002) and the combined method resulted in greater mass loss than the mechanical, except for Corega. For the surface roughness, after the mechanical method, the lowest values were registered for water (-0.007±0.016) and Polident (0.402±0.378); for the combined method, water (-0.063±0.013) showed the lowest values; there was no statistically significant difference between methods. It was concluded that Polident was the less abrasive dentifrice and the association between chemical and mechanical methods increased the mass loss but did not change the surface roughness of specimens.
id FUNORP-1_07dfc58f3b3060b4e0397b8c149f0991
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-64402015000300292
network_acronym_str FUNORP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Dental Journal
repository_id_str
spelling Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansingcomplete denturedenture cleansersdentifricessodium hypochloriteadverse effectsThis study evaluated the abrasiveness of mechanical and combined methods of denture hygiene, by the analysis of mass loss and surface roughness. Acrylic resin specimens (Plexiglass) were brushed by a tooth brushing machine (Mavtec) with a soft brush (Tek) and water (control) or four dentifrices (Sorriso, Colgate, Polident and Corega) (Experimental groups) for 50 min, representing one year of brushing (mechanical method). After brushing, the specimens were immersed in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite simulating a daily cleaning of 20 min for one year (combined method). Distilled water (23 ºC) was employed as control. The mass loss (g) was analyzed by an analytical balance and the surface roughness (μm) by a rugosimeter. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α=0.05). Polident dentifrice showed lowest values of mass loss for both methods (mechanical: -0.0072±0.0017, combined:-0.011±0.002) and the combined method resulted in greater mass loss than the mechanical, except for Corega. For the surface roughness, after the mechanical method, the lowest values were registered for water (-0.007±0.016) and Polident (0.402±0.378); for the combined method, water (-0.063±0.013) showed the lowest values; there was no statistically significant difference between methods. It was concluded that Polident was the less abrasive dentifrice and the association between chemical and mechanical methods increased the mass loss but did not change the surface roughness of specimens.Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto2015-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300292Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.3 2015reponame:Brazilian Dental Journalinstname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)instacron:FUNORP10.1590/0103-6440201300028info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSorgini,Danilo BaleroSilva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena daMuglia,Valdir AntônioSouza,Raphael Freitas deArruda,Carolina Noronha Ferraz deParanhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveiraeng2015-07-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-64402015000300292Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bdj/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br1806-47600103-6440opendoar:2015-07-14T00:00Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
title Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
spellingShingle Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
Sorgini,Danilo Balero
complete denture
denture cleansers
dentifrices
sodium hypochlorite
adverse effects
title_short Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
title_full Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
title_fullStr Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
title_full_unstemmed Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
title_sort Adverse Effects on PMMA Caused by Mechanical and Combined Methods of Denture Cleansing
author Sorgini,Danilo Balero
author_facet Sorgini,Danilo Balero
Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Muglia,Valdir Antônio
Souza,Raphael Freitas de
Arruda,Carolina Noronha Ferraz de
Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Muglia,Valdir Antônio
Souza,Raphael Freitas de
Arruda,Carolina Noronha Ferraz de
Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sorgini,Danilo Balero
Silva-Lovato,Cláudia Helena da
Muglia,Valdir Antônio
Souza,Raphael Freitas de
Arruda,Carolina Noronha Ferraz de
Paranhos,Helena de Freitas Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv complete denture
denture cleansers
dentifrices
sodium hypochlorite
adverse effects
topic complete denture
denture cleansers
dentifrices
sodium hypochlorite
adverse effects
description This study evaluated the abrasiveness of mechanical and combined methods of denture hygiene, by the analysis of mass loss and surface roughness. Acrylic resin specimens (Plexiglass) were brushed by a tooth brushing machine (Mavtec) with a soft brush (Tek) and water (control) or four dentifrices (Sorriso, Colgate, Polident and Corega) (Experimental groups) for 50 min, representing one year of brushing (mechanical method). After brushing, the specimens were immersed in 0.5% sodium hypochlorite simulating a daily cleaning of 20 min for one year (combined method). Distilled water (23 ºC) was employed as control. The mass loss (g) was analyzed by an analytical balance and the surface roughness (μm) by a rugosimeter. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α=0.05). Polident dentifrice showed lowest values of mass loss for both methods (mechanical: -0.0072±0.0017, combined:-0.011±0.002) and the combined method resulted in greater mass loss than the mechanical, except for Corega. For the surface roughness, after the mechanical method, the lowest values were registered for water (-0.007±0.016) and Polident (0.402±0.378); for the combined method, water (-0.063±0.013) showed the lowest values; there was no statistically significant difference between methods. It was concluded that Polident was the less abrasive dentifrice and the association between chemical and mechanical methods increased the mass loss but did not change the surface roughness of specimens.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300292
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-64402015000300292
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6440201300028
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal v.26 n.3 2015
reponame:Brazilian Dental Journal
instname:Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron:FUNORP
instname_str Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
instacron_str FUNORP
institution FUNORP
reponame_str Brazilian Dental Journal
collection Brazilian Dental Journal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Dental Journal - Fundação Odontológica de Ribeirão Preto (FUNORP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bdj@forp.usp.br||sergio@fosjc.unesp.br
_version_ 1754204093551738880