Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho,William D.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Rosalino,Luís M., Adania,Cristina H., Esbérard,Carlos E. L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Iheringia. Série Zoologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0073-47212016000100205
Resumo: ABSTRACT Variation in body size, behavior, feeding habits and habitat use patterns in medium- and large-sized mammals influence the adequacy of sampling methods to register presence and abundance. Moreover, even if methods are similarly adequate, different methodologies result in distinct cost-efficiency relationships (i.e. some may have reduced costs, be less time-consuming and/or require less-skilled technicians). Focusing on three different sampling methods commonly used to monitor medium and large mammals in seasonal tropical forests, we compared the species richness detected by each method and quantified their cost-efficiencies: (1) camera traps; (2) line transects for direct observations of animals; and (3) line transects seeking tracks/footprints. We simultaneously monitored medium and large mammals along five trails between July and August 2009 and January and February 2010, in the Serra do Japi Biological Reserve, São Paulo, Brazil. Data from two distinct seasons demonstrated that significantly higher species richness was achieved by using signs of presence and direct observations detected in transects. Camera traps recorded the fewest species, but represented the lowest cost per species. Direct observations and searches for tracks/footprints required a greater number of field technicians (with more skill and experience) to record the focal species and therefore have a higher cost, but allowed twice as many species to be recorded compared to camera traps. The choice of sampling methodology depends on the study objective, mammal species targeted and/or amount of resources available. We advocate use of camera traps for long-term studies and in conjunction with the other two methods to improve identification accuracy, allow individual identification and permit more accurate abundance estimates.
id FZBRS-2_27f6efa2d0764616e536a270c04cb17b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0073-47212016000100205
network_acronym_str FZBRS-2
network_name_str Iheringia. Série Zoologia
repository_id_str
spelling Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologiesCamera trapdirect observationsmammalsabundance estimatesanimal tracksABSTRACT Variation in body size, behavior, feeding habits and habitat use patterns in medium- and large-sized mammals influence the adequacy of sampling methods to register presence and abundance. Moreover, even if methods are similarly adequate, different methodologies result in distinct cost-efficiency relationships (i.e. some may have reduced costs, be less time-consuming and/or require less-skilled technicians). Focusing on three different sampling methods commonly used to monitor medium and large mammals in seasonal tropical forests, we compared the species richness detected by each method and quantified their cost-efficiencies: (1) camera traps; (2) line transects for direct observations of animals; and (3) line transects seeking tracks/footprints. We simultaneously monitored medium and large mammals along five trails between July and August 2009 and January and February 2010, in the Serra do Japi Biological Reserve, São Paulo, Brazil. Data from two distinct seasons demonstrated that significantly higher species richness was achieved by using signs of presence and direct observations detected in transects. Camera traps recorded the fewest species, but represented the lowest cost per species. Direct observations and searches for tracks/footprints required a greater number of field technicians (with more skill and experience) to record the focal species and therefore have a higher cost, but allowed twice as many species to be recorded compared to camera traps. The choice of sampling methodology depends on the study objective, mammal species targeted and/or amount of resources available. We advocate use of camera traps for long-term studies and in conjunction with the other two methods to improve identification accuracy, allow individual identification and permit more accurate abundance estimates.Museu de Ciências Naturais2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0073-47212016000100205Iheringia. Série Zoologia v.106 2016reponame:Iheringia. Série Zoologiainstname:Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB/RS)instacron:FZB/RS10.1590/1678-4766e2016005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho,William D.Rosalino,Luís M.Adania,Cristina H.Esbérard,Carlos E. L.eng2016-06-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0073-47212016000100205Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/iszPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||iheringia-zoo@fzb.rs.gov.br1678-47660073-4721opendoar:2016-06-07T00:00Iheringia. Série Zoologia - Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB/RS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
title Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
spellingShingle Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
Carvalho,William D.
Camera trap
direct observations
mammals
abundance estimates
animal tracks
title_short Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
title_full Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
title_fullStr Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
title_full_unstemmed Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
title_sort Mammal inventories in Seasonal Neotropical Forests: traditional approaches still compensate drawbacks of modern technologies
author Carvalho,William D.
author_facet Carvalho,William D.
Rosalino,Luís M.
Adania,Cristina H.
Esbérard,Carlos E. L.
author_role author
author2 Rosalino,Luís M.
Adania,Cristina H.
Esbérard,Carlos E. L.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho,William D.
Rosalino,Luís M.
Adania,Cristina H.
Esbérard,Carlos E. L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Camera trap
direct observations
mammals
abundance estimates
animal tracks
topic Camera trap
direct observations
mammals
abundance estimates
animal tracks
description ABSTRACT Variation in body size, behavior, feeding habits and habitat use patterns in medium- and large-sized mammals influence the adequacy of sampling methods to register presence and abundance. Moreover, even if methods are similarly adequate, different methodologies result in distinct cost-efficiency relationships (i.e. some may have reduced costs, be less time-consuming and/or require less-skilled technicians). Focusing on three different sampling methods commonly used to monitor medium and large mammals in seasonal tropical forests, we compared the species richness detected by each method and quantified their cost-efficiencies: (1) camera traps; (2) line transects for direct observations of animals; and (3) line transects seeking tracks/footprints. We simultaneously monitored medium and large mammals along five trails between July and August 2009 and January and February 2010, in the Serra do Japi Biological Reserve, São Paulo, Brazil. Data from two distinct seasons demonstrated that significantly higher species richness was achieved by using signs of presence and direct observations detected in transects. Camera traps recorded the fewest species, but represented the lowest cost per species. Direct observations and searches for tracks/footprints required a greater number of field technicians (with more skill and experience) to record the focal species and therefore have a higher cost, but allowed twice as many species to be recorded compared to camera traps. The choice of sampling methodology depends on the study objective, mammal species targeted and/or amount of resources available. We advocate use of camera traps for long-term studies and in conjunction with the other two methods to improve identification accuracy, allow individual identification and permit more accurate abundance estimates.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0073-47212016000100205
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0073-47212016000100205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-4766e2016005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Museu de Ciências Naturais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Museu de Ciências Naturais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Iheringia. Série Zoologia v.106 2016
reponame:Iheringia. Série Zoologia
instname:Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB/RS)
instacron:FZB/RS
instname_str Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB/RS)
instacron_str FZB/RS
institution FZB/RS
reponame_str Iheringia. Série Zoologia
collection Iheringia. Série Zoologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Iheringia. Série Zoologia - Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul (FZB/RS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||iheringia-zoo@fzb.rs.gov.br
_version_ 1754203964766683136