Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Bragantia |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100001 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate twelve genotypes of common bean for intermittent drought stress and for root growth angle. The water deficit experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016in a randomized block experimental design with split plots and three replications. Two treatments were applied: an irrigated treatment and a water deficit treatment, in which irrigation was suspended in pre-flowering and remained suspended up to the time at which the matrix potential of the soil was measured to be near –199 kPa. Atthe maximum point of water deficit, physiological and morphological traits were evaluated, and at physiological maturity, the yield compounds and grain yield. To evaluate root growth angle in 2016, a growth pouch system was used in a randomized block design, with five replications. Water deficit reduced genotype performance for all the traits except leaf temperature and first pod height. In relation to grain yield, the genotypes SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce performed better under water restriction conditions in both evaluations. The genotype Gen TS 4-7 performed better in the 2015 evaluation, and Gen TS 3-1 andGen TS 3-3 in 2016. SEA 5, Gen TS 3-1, and Carioca Precoce had the highest harvest indexes in 2015; and Gen TS 3-1, Gen TS 3-2,Gen TS 3-3, Gen P5-4-3-1, IAPAR 81, Carioca Precoce, and SEA 5 in 2016. SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce had the best root growth angle and were considered sources of tolerance to water deficit. |
id |
IAC-1_b777a57d496d809af1c324c0c790afcc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0006-87052019000100001 |
network_acronym_str |
IAC-1 |
network_name_str |
Bragantia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerancePhaseolus vulgariswater deficitgrain yieldroot growth angleABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate twelve genotypes of common bean for intermittent drought stress and for root growth angle. The water deficit experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016in a randomized block experimental design with split plots and three replications. Two treatments were applied: an irrigated treatment and a water deficit treatment, in which irrigation was suspended in pre-flowering and remained suspended up to the time at which the matrix potential of the soil was measured to be near –199 kPa. Atthe maximum point of water deficit, physiological and morphological traits were evaluated, and at physiological maturity, the yield compounds and grain yield. To evaluate root growth angle in 2016, a growth pouch system was used in a randomized block design, with five replications. Water deficit reduced genotype performance for all the traits except leaf temperature and first pod height. In relation to grain yield, the genotypes SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce performed better under water restriction conditions in both evaluations. The genotype Gen TS 4-7 performed better in the 2015 evaluation, and Gen TS 3-1 andGen TS 3-3 in 2016. SEA 5, Gen TS 3-1, and Carioca Precoce had the highest harvest indexes in 2015; and Gen TS 3-1, Gen TS 3-2,Gen TS 3-3, Gen P5-4-3-1, IAPAR 81, Carioca Precoce, and SEA 5 in 2016. SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce had the best root growth angle and were considered sources of tolerance to water deficit.Instituto Agronômico de Campinas2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100001Bragantia v.78 n.1 2019reponame:Bragantiainstname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)instacron:IAC10.1590/1678-4499.2018002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro,TamiresSilva,Daiana Alves daEsteves,José Antônio de FátimaAzevedo,Cleber Vinicius GiarettaGonçalves,João Guilherme RibeiroCarbonell,Sérgio Augusto MoraisChiorato,Alisson Fernandoeng2019-02-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0006-87052019000100001Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/brag/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br1678-44990006-8705opendoar:2019-02-26T00:00Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
title |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance Ribeiro,Tamires Phaseolus vulgaris water deficit grain yield root growth angle |
title_short |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
title_full |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
title_sort |
Evaluation of common bean genotypes for drought tolerance |
author |
Ribeiro,Tamires |
author_facet |
Ribeiro,Tamires Silva,Daiana Alves da Esteves,José Antônio de Fátima Azevedo,Cleber Vinicius Giaretta Gonçalves,João Guilherme Ribeiro Carbonell,Sérgio Augusto Morais Chiorato,Alisson Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Daiana Alves da Esteves,José Antônio de Fátima Azevedo,Cleber Vinicius Giaretta Gonçalves,João Guilherme Ribeiro Carbonell,Sérgio Augusto Morais Chiorato,Alisson Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro,Tamires Silva,Daiana Alves da Esteves,José Antônio de Fátima Azevedo,Cleber Vinicius Giaretta Gonçalves,João Guilherme Ribeiro Carbonell,Sérgio Augusto Morais Chiorato,Alisson Fernando |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Phaseolus vulgaris water deficit grain yield root growth angle |
topic |
Phaseolus vulgaris water deficit grain yield root growth angle |
description |
ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate twelve genotypes of common bean for intermittent drought stress and for root growth angle. The water deficit experiments were conducted in 2015 and 2016in a randomized block experimental design with split plots and three replications. Two treatments were applied: an irrigated treatment and a water deficit treatment, in which irrigation was suspended in pre-flowering and remained suspended up to the time at which the matrix potential of the soil was measured to be near –199 kPa. Atthe maximum point of water deficit, physiological and morphological traits were evaluated, and at physiological maturity, the yield compounds and grain yield. To evaluate root growth angle in 2016, a growth pouch system was used in a randomized block design, with five replications. Water deficit reduced genotype performance for all the traits except leaf temperature and first pod height. In relation to grain yield, the genotypes SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce performed better under water restriction conditions in both evaluations. The genotype Gen TS 4-7 performed better in the 2015 evaluation, and Gen TS 3-1 andGen TS 3-3 in 2016. SEA 5, Gen TS 3-1, and Carioca Precoce had the highest harvest indexes in 2015; and Gen TS 3-1, Gen TS 3-2,Gen TS 3-3, Gen P5-4-3-1, IAPAR 81, Carioca Precoce, and SEA 5 in 2016. SEA 5 and Carioca Precoce had the best root growth angle and were considered sources of tolerance to water deficit. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100001 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0006-87052019000100001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1678-4499.2018002 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Agronômico de Campinas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Agronômico de Campinas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Bragantia v.78 n.1 2019 reponame:Bragantia instname:Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC) instacron:IAC |
instname_str |
Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC) |
instacron_str |
IAC |
institution |
IAC |
reponame_str |
Bragantia |
collection |
Bragantia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Bragantia - Instituto Agronômico de Campinas (IAC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br||bragantia@iac.sp.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754193306769686528 |