The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Contexto Internacional |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200203 |
Resumo: | Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse British media coverage of the Brazilian dictatorship. Specifically, we examine coverage by the weekly news magazine The Economist in the period from the promulgation of Institutional Act 5 in December 1968, to 1975, the second year of the Geisel administration. We compare its coverage with that of The Times and The Guardian in order to reach an understanding of its portrayal of Brazil in terms of two themes in particular: economic performance (notably the ‘Brazilian miracle’), and political repression. We relate the latter theme to the international condemnations of torture, and the disappearance of political prisoners. Furthermore, given that The Economist mainly covers issues from an economic perspective, we examine shifts in the frequency and content of articles about Brazil, and conclude that The Economist’s portrayal of Brazil in the period under review deviated from that of much of the rest of the British Press. |
id |
PUC_RIO-22_a29e49dfaba8b09bff5f27d64dc3bb9f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-85292018000200203 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RIO-22 |
network_name_str |
Contexto Internacional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military DictatorshipBrazilian dictatorshipBrazil’s foreign imageBrazil and Englandtorture in BrazilBrazil in the British mediaAbstract The purpose of this article is to analyse British media coverage of the Brazilian dictatorship. Specifically, we examine coverage by the weekly news magazine The Economist in the period from the promulgation of Institutional Act 5 in December 1968, to 1975, the second year of the Geisel administration. We compare its coverage with that of The Times and The Guardian in order to reach an understanding of its portrayal of Brazil in terms of two themes in particular: economic performance (notably the ‘Brazilian miracle’), and political repression. We relate the latter theme to the international condemnations of torture, and the disappearance of political prisoners. Furthermore, given that The Economist mainly covers issues from an economic perspective, we examine shifts in the frequency and content of articles about Brazil, and conclude that The Economist’s portrayal of Brazil in the period under review deviated from that of much of the rest of the British Press.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200203Contexto Internacional v.40 n.2 2018reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSales,Camila Maria RissoMartins Filho,João Robertoeng2018-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292018000200203Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2018-09-17T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
title |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
spellingShingle |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship Sales,Camila Maria Risso Brazilian dictatorship Brazil’s foreign image Brazil and England torture in Brazil Brazil in the British media |
title_short |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
title_full |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
title_fullStr |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
title_sort |
The Economist and Human Rights Violations in Brazil During the Military Dictatorship |
author |
Sales,Camila Maria Risso |
author_facet |
Sales,Camila Maria Risso Martins Filho,João Roberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Martins Filho,João Roberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sales,Camila Maria Risso Martins Filho,João Roberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian dictatorship Brazil’s foreign image Brazil and England torture in Brazil Brazil in the British media |
topic |
Brazilian dictatorship Brazil’s foreign image Brazil and England torture in Brazil Brazil in the British media |
description |
Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyse British media coverage of the Brazilian dictatorship. Specifically, we examine coverage by the weekly news magazine The Economist in the period from the promulgation of Institutional Act 5 in December 1968, to 1975, the second year of the Geisel administration. We compare its coverage with that of The Times and The Guardian in order to reach an understanding of its portrayal of Brazil in terms of two themes in particular: economic performance (notably the ‘Brazilian miracle’), and political repression. We relate the latter theme to the international condemnations of torture, and the disappearance of political prisoners. Furthermore, given that The Economist mainly covers issues from an economic perspective, we examine shifts in the frequency and content of articles about Brazil, and conclude that The Economist’s portrayal of Brazil in the period under review deviated from that of much of the rest of the British Press. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200203 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200009 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional v.40 n.2 2018 reponame:Contexto Internacional instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) instacron:PUC_RIO |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RIO |
institution |
PUC_RIO |
reponame_str |
Contexto Internacional |
collection |
Contexto Internacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br |
_version_ |
1752127872694222848 |