Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8210
Resumo: The criminal imputation of the legal person, expressly established on the Federal Constitution, was only applied in Brazil with the Law n. 9605/98, when crimes and sanctions were established to be submitted to legal entities that caused damage to the environment. The subject brought to the doctrinal scope a discussion that for a long time was limited to analyzing the possibility or not of the legal person being criminally imputed, ignoring the inherent problems that the criminal system would have to deal with this new subject. Notwithstanding the constitutional protection and the legal provision, the legislation from the dogmatic point of view of Criminal Law presents several legal gaps, being one of them the absence of verification of the legal entity deceit in the crime which is imputed to it. Thus, it was up to the doctrine and jurisprudence of the High Courts during these 20 years of law to indicate alternatives regarding the model of liability to be adopted. The absence of an efficient legislation has led to legal uncertainty in the implementation of the Institute, mainly due to the instability within the High Courts jurisprudence. In this sense, the present work proposes to deepen the doctrinal study on the criminal responsibility of the juridical person, highlighting the arguments for and against it, as well to understand the dogmatic thesis used by the jurisprudence of the High Courts in the criminal imputation of the collective entities. Therefore, the specific aim is to examine the model of responsibility adopted by national jurisprudence and if it suits dogmatic principles of Criminal Law, such as the need for subjective responsibility for legal persons. Finally, assuming that the topic is a reality of the legal system, it should be analyzed how the intent will be analyzed in the criminal responsibility of the legal perso.
id P_RS_72419a76d01d3fce654bca0f6b3dce51
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8210
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Souza, Paulo Vinicius Sporleder dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8959947244274022http://lattes.cnpq.br/8509229795806556Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de2018-07-16T14:49:59Z2018-03-26http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8210The criminal imputation of the legal person, expressly established on the Federal Constitution, was only applied in Brazil with the Law n. 9605/98, when crimes and sanctions were established to be submitted to legal entities that caused damage to the environment. The subject brought to the doctrinal scope a discussion that for a long time was limited to analyzing the possibility or not of the legal person being criminally imputed, ignoring the inherent problems that the criminal system would have to deal with this new subject. Notwithstanding the constitutional protection and the legal provision, the legislation from the dogmatic point of view of Criminal Law presents several legal gaps, being one of them the absence of verification of the legal entity deceit in the crime which is imputed to it. Thus, it was up to the doctrine and jurisprudence of the High Courts during these 20 years of law to indicate alternatives regarding the model of liability to be adopted. The absence of an efficient legislation has led to legal uncertainty in the implementation of the Institute, mainly due to the instability within the High Courts jurisprudence. In this sense, the present work proposes to deepen the doctrinal study on the criminal responsibility of the juridical person, highlighting the arguments for and against it, as well to understand the dogmatic thesis used by the jurisprudence of the High Courts in the criminal imputation of the collective entities. Therefore, the specific aim is to examine the model of responsibility adopted by national jurisprudence and if it suits dogmatic principles of Criminal Law, such as the need for subjective responsibility for legal persons. Finally, assuming that the topic is a reality of the legal system, it should be analyzed how the intent will be analyzed in the criminal responsibility of the legal perso.A responsabilidade penal da pessoa jur?dica, prevista expressamente na Constitui??o Federal, ? aplicada no Brasil a partir da lei n? 9.605/98, quando estabeleceram crimes e san??es a serem submetidos ?s pessoas jur?dicas que provocassem danos ao meio ambiente. O tema trouxe para o ?mbito doutrin?rio uma discuss?o que durante muito tempo limitou-se a analisar a possibilidade ou n?o da pessoa jur?dica ser imputada criminalmente, deixando-se de lado os problemas inerentes que o sistema penal teria de enfrentar com esse novo sujeito. N?o obstante o amparo constitucional e a previs?o legal, a legisla??o do ponto de vista dogm?tico penal apresenta diversas lacunas, dentre elas a aus?ncia de verifica??o do dolo da pessoa jur?dica no crime que lhe ? imputada. Dessa forma, coube ? doutrina e ? jurisprud?ncia dos Tribunais Superiores durante esses 20 anos de vig?ncia da lei apontar alternativas quanto ao modelo de responsabiliza??o a ser adotado. A aus?ncia de uma legisla??o eficiente provoca inseguran?a jur?dica na aplica??o do instituto, sobretudo em raz?o da instabilidade na jurisprud?ncia das Cortes Superiores. Nesse sentido, o presente trabalho aprofunda o estudo doutrin?rio sobre a responsabilidade penal da pessoa jur?dica, trazendo os argumentos contr?rios e favor?veis, bem como compreende os argumentos dogm?ticos utilizados pela jurisprud?ncia dos Tribunais Superiores na responsabilidade penal dos entes coletivos. Assim, o objetivo espec?fico ? examinar qual o modelo de responsabiliza??o adotado pela jurisprud?ncia nacional e se atende aos princ?pios dogm?ticos penais, como a necessidade da responsabilidade subjetiva para as pessoas jur?dicas. Por fim, partindo do princ?pio que o tema ? uma realidade do ordenamento jur?dico, analisa-se o dolo na responsabilidade penal da pessoa jur?dica.Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-07-11T20:24:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf: 1590612 bytes, checksum: d1e8756ec37dd3e127ab8cf8183e8b23 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-07-16T14:33:17Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf: 1590612 bytes, checksum: d1e8756ec37dd3e127ab8cf8183e8b23 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-16T14:49:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Disserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf: 1590612 bytes, checksum: d1e8756ec37dd3e127ab8cf8183e8b23 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-26application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/172828/Disserta%c3%a7%c3%a3o_Final_CEZAR%20LIMA.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias CriminaisPUCRSBrasilEscola de DireitoPessoa Jur?dicaResponsabilidade PenalElemento SubjetivoTribunais SuperioresCIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOImputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superioresinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisTrabalho n?o apresenta restri??o para publica??o32637738960505291735005005004512033976268881925-7277407233034425144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAILDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf.jpgDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg5918http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/4/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdf.jpg844d89a7363b468020976815721a3cdaMD54TEXTDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf.txtDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdf.txttext/plain302610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdf.txtd2d9becf361f87138a7903ed8bc01524MD53ORIGINALDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdfDisserta??o_Final_CEZAR LIMA.pdfapplication/pdf1590612http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdfd1e8756ec37dd3e127ab8cf8183e8b23MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-8610http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/1/license.txt5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1beMD51tede/82102018-07-16 12:01:03.593oai:tede2.pucrs.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2018-07-16T15:01:03Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
title Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
spellingShingle Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de
Pessoa Jur?dica
Responsabilidade Penal
Elemento Subjetivo
Tribunais Superiores
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
title_full Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
title_fullStr Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
title_full_unstemmed Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
title_sort Imputa??o penal da pessoa jur?dica no Brasil : os fundamentos dogm?ticos e a responsabiliza??o subjetiva na vis?o dos tribunais superiores
author Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de
author_facet Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Souza, Paulo Vinicius Sporleder de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8959947244274022
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8509229795806556
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Cezar Augusto Giacobbo de
contributor_str_mv Souza, Paulo Vinicius Sporleder de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pessoa Jur?dica
Responsabilidade Penal
Elemento Subjetivo
Tribunais Superiores
topic Pessoa Jur?dica
Responsabilidade Penal
Elemento Subjetivo
Tribunais Superiores
CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The criminal imputation of the legal person, expressly established on the Federal Constitution, was only applied in Brazil with the Law n. 9605/98, when crimes and sanctions were established to be submitted to legal entities that caused damage to the environment. The subject brought to the doctrinal scope a discussion that for a long time was limited to analyzing the possibility or not of the legal person being criminally imputed, ignoring the inherent problems that the criminal system would have to deal with this new subject. Notwithstanding the constitutional protection and the legal provision, the legislation from the dogmatic point of view of Criminal Law presents several legal gaps, being one of them the absence of verification of the legal entity deceit in the crime which is imputed to it. Thus, it was up to the doctrine and jurisprudence of the High Courts during these 20 years of law to indicate alternatives regarding the model of liability to be adopted. The absence of an efficient legislation has led to legal uncertainty in the implementation of the Institute, mainly due to the instability within the High Courts jurisprudence. In this sense, the present work proposes to deepen the doctrinal study on the criminal responsibility of the juridical person, highlighting the arguments for and against it, as well to understand the dogmatic thesis used by the jurisprudence of the High Courts in the criminal imputation of the collective entities. Therefore, the specific aim is to examine the model of responsibility adopted by national jurisprudence and if it suits dogmatic principles of Criminal Law, such as the need for subjective responsibility for legal persons. Finally, assuming that the topic is a reality of the legal system, it should be analyzed how the intent will be analyzed in the criminal responsibility of the legal perso.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-07-16T14:49:59Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018-03-26
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8210
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/8210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 3263773896050529173
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
500
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 4512033976268881925
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -7277407233034425144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/4/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/3/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/2/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o_Final_CEZAR+LIMA.pdf
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/8210/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 844d89a7363b468020976815721a3cda
d2d9becf361f87138a7903ed8bc01524
d1e8756ec37dd3e127ab8cf8183e8b23
5a9d6006225b368ef605ba16b4f6d1be
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793113837043712