Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Achutti, Daniel Silva
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Tese
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
Texto Completo: http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901
Resumo: The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian system
id P_RS_b0815d508ba69d6d118417a510420afc
oai_identifier_str oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4901
network_acronym_str P_RS
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
repository_id_str
spelling Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli deCPF:55120687091http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703859H8CPF:96350598091Achutti, Daniel Silva2015-04-14T14:48:13Z2012-09-282012-07-13ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian systemO presente trabalho tem como objetivo discutir as potencialidades da justi?a restaurativa a partir de uma abordagem abolicionista. Analisa as obras de Louk Hulsman e Nils Christie e aborda a import?ncia das suas cr?ticas para a emerg?ncia da discuss?o sobre a justi?a restaurativa nos d?cadas de 1970 e 1980. Apresenta o abolicionismo penal como uma perspectiva te?rica negativa e, simultaneamente, construtiva-propositiva, por propor a desconstru??o do sistema penal e ao mesmo tempo oferecer importantes elementos para a constru??o de uma nova proposta de administra??o de conflitos. Desde essa perspectiva, refere que as cr?ticas construtivas do abolicionismo penal encontram na justi?a restaurativa a sua maior possibilidade de concretiza??o em termos de pol?tica criminal. A seguir, apresenta um conjunto de obst?culos jur?dicos e pol?ticos para uma reforma significativa do direito penal brasileiro, e analisa duas importantes experi?ncias contempor?neas de reformas penais: primeiramente, a reforma institu?da pela lei n. 9.099/1995 (Lei dos Juizados Especiais Criminais) e, ap?s, as altera??es implementadas pela lei n. 11.340/2006 (Lei Maria da Penha). Com tais an?lises, ? realizado um diagn?stico da aplica??o de ambas as leis, para, ao final, serem enumerados os erros e os acertos do legislador, como forma de aprendizado para que futuras reformas penais n?o incidam nos mesmos equ?vocos e possam ser beneficiadas com os pontos positivos verificados. Posteriormente, ? apresentado, a t?tulo ilustrativo, o modelo belga de justi?a restaurativa, por se tratar de uma estrutura independente de administra??o de conflitos que, concomitantemente, possui direta rela??o com a justi?a criminal, ao trabalhar com casos derivados do sistema judicial e produzir nele importantes efeitos jur?dicos. Em rela??o ao Brasil, ? exposto o cen?rio atual de modos alternativos de resolu??o de conflitos, abarcando iniciativas pontuais de acesso ? justi?a (n?o necessariamente restaurativas) e os projetos-piloto e legislativo espec?ficos sobre justi?a restaurativa. Ao final, ? demonstrada a import?ncia das cr?ticas abolicionistas para a estrutura??o de um modelo brasileiro de justi?a restaurativa, a ser constru?do a partir do aprendizado obtido com as experi?ncias legislativas anteriores (leis 9.099 e 11.340), com os obst?culos a serem enfrentados para a sua devida implanta??o, e pelo par?metro oferecido pelo sistema belgaMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:48:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 441970.pdf: 202017 bytes, checksum: ccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-07-13application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/15827/441970.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias CriminaisPUCRSBRFaculdade de DireitoDIREITOCRIMINOLOGIAJUSTI?A RESTAURATIVAJUSTI?A CRIMINALABOLICIONISMO PENALREFORMA PENALCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOJusti?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis32637738960505291735006002194221341323903125info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL441970.pdf.jpg441970.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3628http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/3/441970.pdf.jpg69a54104f7c56d763f0391c58f711218MD53TEXT441970.pdf.txt441970.pdf.txttext/plain82607http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/2/441970.pdf.txtee4e4fbb98b568264c9f7dc5fc6e4d35MD52ORIGINAL441970.pdfapplication/pdf202017http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/1/441970.pdfccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3MD51tede/49012015-04-17 15:04:06.767oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4901Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-17T18:04:06Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
title Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
spellingShingle Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
Achutti, Daniel Silva
DIREITO
CRIMINOLOGIA
JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA
JUSTI?A CRIMINAL
ABOLICIONISMO PENAL
REFORMA PENAL
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
title_short Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
title_full Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
title_fullStr Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
title_sort Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
author Achutti, Daniel Silva
author_facet Achutti, Daniel Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli de
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv CPF:55120687091
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703859H8
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv CPF:96350598091
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Achutti, Daniel Silva
contributor_str_mv Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DIREITO
CRIMINOLOGIA
JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA
JUSTI?A CRIMINAL
ABOLICIONISMO PENAL
REFORMA PENAL
topic DIREITO
CRIMINOLOGIA
JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA
JUSTI?A CRIMINAL
ABOLICIONISMO PENAL
REFORMA PENAL
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO
description The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian system
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-09-28
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-07-13
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-04-14T14:48:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901
identifier_str_mv ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.
url http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv 3263773896050529173
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 2194221341323903125
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv PUCRS
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Direito
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/3/441970.pdf.jpg
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/2/441970.pdf.txt
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/1/441970.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 69a54104f7c56d763f0391c58f711218
ee4e4fbb98b568264c9f7dc5fc6e4d35
ccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.central@pucrs.br||
_version_ 1796793085727866880