Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
Texto Completo: | http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian system |
id |
P_RS_b0815d508ba69d6d118417a510420afc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4901 |
network_acronym_str |
P_RS |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli deCPF:55120687091http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703859H8CPF:96350598091Achutti, Daniel Silva2015-04-14T14:48:13Z2012-09-282012-07-13ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012.http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian systemO presente trabalho tem como objetivo discutir as potencialidades da justi?a restaurativa a partir de uma abordagem abolicionista. Analisa as obras de Louk Hulsman e Nils Christie e aborda a import?ncia das suas cr?ticas para a emerg?ncia da discuss?o sobre a justi?a restaurativa nos d?cadas de 1970 e 1980. Apresenta o abolicionismo penal como uma perspectiva te?rica negativa e, simultaneamente, construtiva-propositiva, por propor a desconstru??o do sistema penal e ao mesmo tempo oferecer importantes elementos para a constru??o de uma nova proposta de administra??o de conflitos. Desde essa perspectiva, refere que as cr?ticas construtivas do abolicionismo penal encontram na justi?a restaurativa a sua maior possibilidade de concretiza??o em termos de pol?tica criminal. A seguir, apresenta um conjunto de obst?culos jur?dicos e pol?ticos para uma reforma significativa do direito penal brasileiro, e analisa duas importantes experi?ncias contempor?neas de reformas penais: primeiramente, a reforma institu?da pela lei n. 9.099/1995 (Lei dos Juizados Especiais Criminais) e, ap?s, as altera??es implementadas pela lei n. 11.340/2006 (Lei Maria da Penha). Com tais an?lises, ? realizado um diagn?stico da aplica??o de ambas as leis, para, ao final, serem enumerados os erros e os acertos do legislador, como forma de aprendizado para que futuras reformas penais n?o incidam nos mesmos equ?vocos e possam ser beneficiadas com os pontos positivos verificados. Posteriormente, ? apresentado, a t?tulo ilustrativo, o modelo belga de justi?a restaurativa, por se tratar de uma estrutura independente de administra??o de conflitos que, concomitantemente, possui direta rela??o com a justi?a criminal, ao trabalhar com casos derivados do sistema judicial e produzir nele importantes efeitos jur?dicos. Em rela??o ao Brasil, ? exposto o cen?rio atual de modos alternativos de resolu??o de conflitos, abarcando iniciativas pontuais de acesso ? justi?a (n?o necessariamente restaurativas) e os projetos-piloto e legislativo espec?ficos sobre justi?a restaurativa. Ao final, ? demonstrada a import?ncia das cr?ticas abolicionistas para a estrutura??o de um modelo brasileiro de justi?a restaurativa, a ser constru?do a partir do aprendizado obtido com as experi?ncias legislativas anteriores (leis 9.099 e 11.340), com os obst?culos a serem enfrentados para a sua devida implanta??o, e pelo par?metro oferecido pelo sistema belgaMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:48:13Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 441970.pdf: 202017 bytes, checksum: ccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2012-07-13application/pdfhttp://tede2.pucrs.br:80/tede2/retrieve/15827/441970.pdf.jpgporPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do SulPrograma de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias CriminaisPUCRSBRFaculdade de DireitoDIREITOCRIMINOLOGIAJUSTI?A RESTAURATIVAJUSTI?A CRIMINALABOLICIONISMO PENALREFORMA PENALCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOJusti?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis32637738960505291735006002194221341323903125info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RSinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSTHUMBNAIL441970.pdf.jpg441970.pdf.jpgimage/jpeg3628http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/3/441970.pdf.jpg69a54104f7c56d763f0391c58f711218MD53TEXT441970.pdf.txt441970.pdf.txttext/plain82607http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/2/441970.pdf.txtee4e4fbb98b568264c9f7dc5fc6e4d35MD52ORIGINAL441970.pdfapplication/pdf202017http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/1/441970.pdfccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3MD51tede/49012015-04-17 15:04:06.767oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4901Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/PRIhttps://tede2.pucrs.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.central@pucrs.br||opendoar:2015-04-17T18:04:06Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
title |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil Achutti, Daniel Silva DIREITO CRIMINOLOGIA JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA JUSTI?A CRIMINAL ABOLICIONISMO PENAL REFORMA PENAL CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
title_short |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
title_full |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
title_sort |
Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil |
author |
Achutti, Daniel Silva |
author_facet |
Achutti, Daniel Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli de |
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:55120687091 |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4703859H8 |
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv |
CPF:96350598091 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Achutti, Daniel Silva |
contributor_str_mv |
Azevedo, Rodrigo Ghiringhelli de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DIREITO CRIMINOLOGIA JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA JUSTI?A CRIMINAL ABOLICIONISMO PENAL REFORMA PENAL |
topic |
DIREITO CRIMINOLOGIA JUSTI?A RESTAURATIVA JUSTI?A CRIMINAL ABOLICIONISMO PENAL REFORMA PENAL CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO |
description |
The present study aims to discuss the potentialities of restorative justice from an abolitionist approach. It analyzes the work of Louk Hulsman and Nils Christie and addresses the importance of their critics to the emergence of the discussion about restorative justice in the 1970s and 1980s. It then introduces the penal abolitionism as a negative and, simultaneously, propositional-constructive theoretical perspective, for proposing the deconstruction of penal system and for offering at the same time important elements for the construction of a new proposal of conflicts administration. From this approach, it states that the constructive critics of penal abolitionism finds in restorative justice its greatest possibility of accomplishment in terms of criminal policy. Afterwards, it highlights a set of legal and political obstacles for a meaningful reform of the Brazilian criminal law, and reviews two important contemporary experiences of penal reforms: first, the reform introduced by Law n. 9.099/1995 (Law of Special Criminal Courts), and after the changes implemented by the Law n. 11.340/2006 (Maria da Penha Law). Since these reviews, it is made a diagnosis of the application of both Laws, and in the end it is shown its wrongs and successes as a way of learning, so that future penal reforms can avoid the same misunderstandings and can be benefited with the positive aspects observed. Subsequently, it is presented, for illustrative purposes, the Belgian model of restorative justice, because of its independent structure for conflict management that concomitantly has direct relationship with the criminal justice system, working with cases derived from the judicial system and providing important legal effects on it. About Brazil, it is exposed the current scenario of alternative dispute resolution, regarding specific initiatives covering access to justice (not necessarily related to restorative justice), as well as legislative and pilot projects, specifically about restorative justice. At the end, it is demonstrated the importance of abolitionist criticism for structuring a Brazilian model of restorative justice, to be built from the learning experiences of previous penal reforms (Laws n. 9.099 and 11.340), from the obstacles to be faced for a proper implementation of restorative justice, and from the parameters offered by the Belgian system |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2012-09-28 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2012-07-13 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-14T14:48:13Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901 |
identifier_str_mv |
ACHUTTI, Daniel Silva. Justi?a restaurativa e abolicionismo penal : contribui??es para um novo modelo de administra??o de conflitos no Brasil. 2012. 36 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais) - Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2012. |
url |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/handle/tede/4901 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv |
3263773896050529173 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
500 600 |
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv |
2194221341323903125 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
PUCRS |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
BR |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Direito |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/3/441970.pdf.jpg http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/2/441970.pdf.txt http://tede2.pucrs.br/tede2/bitstream/tede/4901/1/441970.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
69a54104f7c56d763f0391c58f711218 ee4e4fbb98b568264c9f7dc5fc6e4d35 ccb0e27f6b27b066b3860f179cda8bd3 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
biblioteca.central@pucrs.br|| |
_version_ |
1796793085727866880 |