Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Simoni,Ricardo Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Miziara,Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes, Esteves,Luis Otávio, Silva,Diógenes de Oliveira, Ribeiro,Cristina Alves, Smith,Mariana Oki, Paula,Leonardo Ferreira de, Cangiani,Luis Henrique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000200099
Resumo: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown that the rate of propofol infusion may influence the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the Es predicted by the Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) in loss of consciousness during fast or slow induction. METHOD: The study included 28 patients randomly divided into two equal groups. In slow induction group (S), target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol with plasma, Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) with target concentration (Tc) at 2.0-µg mL-1 were administered. When the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es) reached half of Es value, Es was increased to previous Es + 1 µg mL-1, successively, until loss of consciousness. In rapid induction group (R), patients were induced with TCI of propofol with plasma (6.0 µg mL-1) at effect site, and waited until loss of consciousness. RESULTS: In rapid induction group, Tc for loss of consciousness was significantly lower compared to slow induction group (1.67 ± 0.76 and 2.50 ± 0.56 µg mL-1, respectively, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The predicted propofol concentration at the effect site for loss of consciousness is different for rapid induction and slow induction, even with the same pharmacokinetic model of propofol and the same balance constant between plasma and effect site.
id SBA-1_75db37fed401f8d98ba0bf3ec623ebe7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942015000200099
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trialAnestheticsIntravenousPropofolPharmacologyAnesthetic techniquesGeneralIntravenous BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown that the rate of propofol infusion may influence the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the Es predicted by the Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) in loss of consciousness during fast or slow induction. METHOD: The study included 28 patients randomly divided into two equal groups. In slow induction group (S), target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol with plasma, Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) with target concentration (Tc) at 2.0-µg mL-1 were administered. When the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es) reached half of Es value, Es was increased to previous Es + 1 µg mL-1, successively, until loss of consciousness. In rapid induction group (R), patients were induced with TCI of propofol with plasma (6.0 µg mL-1) at effect site, and waited until loss of consciousness. RESULTS: In rapid induction group, Tc for loss of consciousness was significantly lower compared to slow induction group (1.67 ± 0.76 and 2.50 ± 0.56 µg mL-1, respectively, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The predicted propofol concentration at the effect site for loss of consciousness is different for rapid induction and slow induction, even with the same pharmacokinetic model of propofol and the same balance constant between plasma and effect site.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000200099Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.65 n.2 2015reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSimoni,Ricardo FranciscoMiziara,Luiz Eduardo de Paula GomesEsteves,Luis OtávioSilva,Diógenes de OliveiraRibeiro,Cristina AlvesSmith,Mariana OkiPaula,Leonardo Ferreira deCangiani,Luis Henriqueeng2016-02-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942015000200099Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2016-02-12T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
title Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
Simoni,Ricardo Francisco
Anesthetics
Intravenous
Propofol
Pharmacology
Anesthetic techniques
General
Intravenous
title_short Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
title_sort Comparative study between fast and slow induction of propofol given by target-controlled infusion: expected propofol concentration at the effect site. Randomized controlled trial
author Simoni,Ricardo Francisco
author_facet Simoni,Ricardo Francisco
Miziara,Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes
Esteves,Luis Otávio
Silva,Diógenes de Oliveira
Ribeiro,Cristina Alves
Smith,Mariana Oki
Paula,Leonardo Ferreira de
Cangiani,Luis Henrique
author_role author
author2 Miziara,Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes
Esteves,Luis Otávio
Silva,Diógenes de Oliveira
Ribeiro,Cristina Alves
Smith,Mariana Oki
Paula,Leonardo Ferreira de
Cangiani,Luis Henrique
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Simoni,Ricardo Francisco
Miziara,Luiz Eduardo de Paula Gomes
Esteves,Luis Otávio
Silva,Diógenes de Oliveira
Ribeiro,Cristina Alves
Smith,Mariana Oki
Paula,Leonardo Ferreira de
Cangiani,Luis Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anesthetics
Intravenous
Propofol
Pharmacology
Anesthetic techniques
General
Intravenous
topic Anesthetics
Intravenous
Propofol
Pharmacology
Anesthetic techniques
General
Intravenous
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Studies have shown that the rate of propofol infusion may influence the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es). The aim of this study was to evaluate the Es predicted by the Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) in loss of consciousness during fast or slow induction. METHOD: The study included 28 patients randomly divided into two equal groups. In slow induction group (S), target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol with plasma, Marsh pharmacokinetic model (ke0 0.26 min-1) with target concentration (Tc) at 2.0-µg mL-1 were administered. When the predicted propofol concentration at the effect site (Es) reached half of Es value, Es was increased to previous Es + 1 µg mL-1, successively, until loss of consciousness. In rapid induction group (R), patients were induced with TCI of propofol with plasma (6.0 µg mL-1) at effect site, and waited until loss of consciousness. RESULTS: In rapid induction group, Tc for loss of consciousness was significantly lower compared to slow induction group (1.67 ± 0.76 and 2.50 ± 0.56 µg mL-1, respectively, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The predicted propofol concentration at the effect site for loss of consciousness is different for rapid induction and slow induction, even with the same pharmacokinetic model of propofol and the same balance constant between plasma and effect site.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000200099
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942015000200099
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.07.015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.65 n.2 2015
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126628243177472