Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Singh,Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Yahya,Nurlia, Misiran,Karis, Masdar,Azlina, Nor,Nadia Md, Yee,Lee Choon
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000300259
Resumo: ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome. METHODS: One hundred and ten healthy primigravida parturients with a singleton pregnancy of ≥37 weeks gestation and in the active phase of labour were studied. They were enrolled to the CSE (n = 55) or Non-CSE (n = 55) group based on whether they consented to CSE analgesia. Non-CSE parturients were offered other methods of labour analgesia. The duration of the first and second stage of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and Apgar scores were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of the first and second stage of labour was not significantly different between both groups. Instrumental delivery rates between the groups were not significantly different (CSE group, 11% versus Non-CSE group, 16%). The slightly higher incidence of cesarean section in the CSE group (16% versus 15% in the Non-CSE group) was not statistically significant. Neonatal outcome in terms of Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 and 5 min was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the duration of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and neonatal outcome in parturients who received compared to those who did not receive CSE for labour analgesia.
id SBA-1_e31e21c69ee2bf01e4fcc46cb62e44b4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942016000300259
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcomeCombined spinal-epiduralLabour analgesiaFoetal outcomeDuration of labourABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome. METHODS: One hundred and ten healthy primigravida parturients with a singleton pregnancy of ≥37 weeks gestation and in the active phase of labour were studied. They were enrolled to the CSE (n = 55) or Non-CSE (n = 55) group based on whether they consented to CSE analgesia. Non-CSE parturients were offered other methods of labour analgesia. The duration of the first and second stage of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and Apgar scores were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of the first and second stage of labour was not significantly different between both groups. Instrumental delivery rates between the groups were not significantly different (CSE group, 11% versus Non-CSE group, 16%). The slightly higher incidence of cesarean section in the CSE group (16% versus 15% in the Non-CSE group) was not statistically significant. Neonatal outcome in terms of Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 and 5 min was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the duration of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and neonatal outcome in parturients who received compared to those who did not receive CSE for labour analgesia.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000300259Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.66 n.3 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSingh,Suneet Kaur Sra CharanjitYahya,NurliaMisiran,KarisMasdar,AzlinaNor,Nadia MdYee,Lee Chooneng2016-05-30T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942016000300259Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2016-05-30T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
title Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
spellingShingle Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
Singh,Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
Combined spinal-epidural
Labour analgesia
Foetal outcome
Duration of labour
title_short Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
title_full Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
title_fullStr Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
title_full_unstemmed Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
title_sort Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: its effects on delivery outcome
author Singh,Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
author_facet Singh,Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
Yahya,Nurlia
Misiran,Karis
Masdar,Azlina
Nor,Nadia Md
Yee,Lee Choon
author_role author
author2 Yahya,Nurlia
Misiran,Karis
Masdar,Azlina
Nor,Nadia Md
Yee,Lee Choon
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Singh,Suneet Kaur Sra Charanjit
Yahya,Nurlia
Misiran,Karis
Masdar,Azlina
Nor,Nadia Md
Yee,Lee Choon
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Combined spinal-epidural
Labour analgesia
Foetal outcome
Duration of labour
topic Combined spinal-epidural
Labour analgesia
Foetal outcome
Duration of labour
description ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) has become an increasingly popular alternative to traditional labour epidural due to its rapid onset and reliable analgesia provided. This was a prospective, convenient sampling study to determine the effects of CSE analgesia on labour outcome. METHODS: One hundred and ten healthy primigravida parturients with a singleton pregnancy of ≥37 weeks gestation and in the active phase of labour were studied. They were enrolled to the CSE (n = 55) or Non-CSE (n = 55) group based on whether they consented to CSE analgesia. Non-CSE parturients were offered other methods of labour analgesia. The duration of the first and second stage of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and Apgar scores were compared. RESULTS: The mean duration of the first and second stage of labour was not significantly different between both groups. Instrumental delivery rates between the groups were not significantly different (CSE group, 11% versus Non-CSE group, 16%). The slightly higher incidence of cesarean section in the CSE group (16% versus 15% in the Non-CSE group) was not statistically significant. Neonatal outcome in terms of Apgar score of less than 7 at 1 and 5 min was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the duration of labour, rate of instrumental vaginal delivery and emergency cesarean section, and neonatal outcome in parturients who received compared to those who did not receive CSE for labour analgesia.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000300259
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000300259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.09.006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.66 n.3 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126628685676544