Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: CERVEIRA JR.,W.R.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: SILVA,A.F., CRUZ,C., PITELLI,R.A., MARTINS,D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Planta daninha (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100278
Resumo: ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of glyphosate, 2,4-D, and diquat to control the aquatic macrophytes Brachiaria subquadripara, Hedychium coronarium, and Myriophyllum aquaticum under greenhouse conditions. The following herbicides and doses were used: glyphosate at 240, 720, 1,680, 2,640, 3,600, and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1, 2,4-D at 335, 1,005, 1,675, 2,345, and 3,015 g a.e. ha-1, diquat at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 g a.i. ha-1, and a control with 10 replications. Sprayings were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer at a constant pressure of 172.36 KPa, tips DG 11002, and spray solution consumption of 200 L ha-1. The effectiveness of control was evaluated visually at 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45, and 60 days after application (DAA) and dry matter accumulation at 60 DAA. Glyphosate promoted the best effectiveness, with 100% control of B. subquadripara, with no dry matter accumulation from 720 g a.e. ha-1. The herbicide 2,4-D presented the best control for M. aquaticum with 100% control from 1,209 g a.e. ha-1, and for H. coronarium with 99% control from 2.015 g a.e. ha-1, both doses with no dry matter accumulation. The diquat was not effective in controlling the plants of M. aquaticum and B. subquadripara, besides allowing resprouts.
id SBCPD-1_27e31cab31553f1506863fcf433bc0ca
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-83582019000100278
network_acronym_str SBCPD-1
network_name_str Planta daninha (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophyteschemical managementaquatic plantweedaquatic environmentABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of glyphosate, 2,4-D, and diquat to control the aquatic macrophytes Brachiaria subquadripara, Hedychium coronarium, and Myriophyllum aquaticum under greenhouse conditions. The following herbicides and doses were used: glyphosate at 240, 720, 1,680, 2,640, 3,600, and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1, 2,4-D at 335, 1,005, 1,675, 2,345, and 3,015 g a.e. ha-1, diquat at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 g a.i. ha-1, and a control with 10 replications. Sprayings were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer at a constant pressure of 172.36 KPa, tips DG 11002, and spray solution consumption of 200 L ha-1. The effectiveness of control was evaluated visually at 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45, and 60 days after application (DAA) and dry matter accumulation at 60 DAA. Glyphosate promoted the best effectiveness, with 100% control of B. subquadripara, with no dry matter accumulation from 720 g a.e. ha-1. The herbicide 2,4-D presented the best control for M. aquaticum with 100% control from 1,209 g a.e. ha-1, and for H. coronarium with 99% control from 2.015 g a.e. ha-1, both doses with no dry matter accumulation. The diquat was not effective in controlling the plants of M. aquaticum and B. subquadripara, besides allowing resprouts.Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas 2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100278Planta Daninha v.37 2019reponame:Planta daninha (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)instacron:SBCPD10.1590/s0100-83582019370100081info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCERVEIRA JR.,W.R.SILVA,A.F.CRUZ,C.PITELLI,R.A.MARTINS,D.eng2019-09-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-83582019000100278Revistahttp://revistas.cpd.ufv.br/pdaninhaweb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rpdaninha@gmail.com1806-96810100-8358opendoar:2019-09-26T00:00Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
title Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
spellingShingle Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
CERVEIRA JR.,W.R.
chemical management
aquatic plant
weed
aquatic environment
title_short Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
title_full Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
title_fullStr Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
title_full_unstemmed Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
title_sort Herbicides for Rooted Aquatic Macrophytes
author CERVEIRA JR.,W.R.
author_facet CERVEIRA JR.,W.R.
SILVA,A.F.
CRUZ,C.
PITELLI,R.A.
MARTINS,D.
author_role author
author2 SILVA,A.F.
CRUZ,C.
PITELLI,R.A.
MARTINS,D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv CERVEIRA JR.,W.R.
SILVA,A.F.
CRUZ,C.
PITELLI,R.A.
MARTINS,D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv chemical management
aquatic plant
weed
aquatic environment
topic chemical management
aquatic plant
weed
aquatic environment
description ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of glyphosate, 2,4-D, and diquat to control the aquatic macrophytes Brachiaria subquadripara, Hedychium coronarium, and Myriophyllum aquaticum under greenhouse conditions. The following herbicides and doses were used: glyphosate at 240, 720, 1,680, 2,640, 3,600, and 4,320 g a.e. ha-1, 2,4-D at 335, 1,005, 1,675, 2,345, and 3,015 g a.e. ha-1, diquat at 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 600 g a.i. ha-1, and a control with 10 replications. Sprayings were applied with a CO2-pressurized backpack sprayer at a constant pressure of 172.36 KPa, tips DG 11002, and spray solution consumption of 200 L ha-1. The effectiveness of control was evaluated visually at 3, 7, 15, 21, 30, 45, and 60 days after application (DAA) and dry matter accumulation at 60 DAA. Glyphosate promoted the best effectiveness, with 100% control of B. subquadripara, with no dry matter accumulation from 720 g a.e. ha-1. The herbicide 2,4-D presented the best control for M. aquaticum with 100% control from 1,209 g a.e. ha-1, and for H. coronarium with 99% control from 2.015 g a.e. ha-1, both doses with no dry matter accumulation. The diquat was not effective in controlling the plants of M. aquaticum and B. subquadripara, besides allowing resprouts.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100278
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-83582019000100278
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0100-83582019370100081
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Planta Daninha v.37 2019
reponame:Planta daninha (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron:SBCPD
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
instacron_str SBCPD
institution SBCPD
reponame_str Planta daninha (Online)
collection Planta daninha (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Planta daninha (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas (SBCPD)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rpdaninha@gmail.com
_version_ 1752126496957267968