Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Bolini,Helena Maria André
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003
Resumo: This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.
id SBCTA-1_518f3d27ce5da0fee03036992ecaebd2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0101-20612013000400003
network_acronym_str SBCTA-1
network_name_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository_id_str
spelling Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweetenersStevia rebaudianasucraloseneotameMalpighia emarginata DCThis paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos2013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003Food Science and Technology v.33 n.4 2013reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)instacron:SBCTA10.1590/S0101-20612013000400003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra,Mariana Borges de LimaBolini,Helena Maria Andréeng2014-02-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0101-20612013000400003Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/ctaONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista@sbcta.org.br1678-457X0101-2061opendoar:2014-02-12T00:00Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
spellingShingle Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima
Stevia rebaudiana
sucralose
neotame
Malpighia emarginata DC
title_short Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_full Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_fullStr Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_full_unstemmed Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
title_sort Sensory and physicochemical evaluation of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and different sweeteners
author Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima
author_facet Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima
Bolini,Helena Maria André
author_role author
author2 Bolini,Helena Maria André
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dutra,Mariana Borges de Lima
Bolini,Helena Maria André
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Stevia rebaudiana
sucralose
neotame
Malpighia emarginata DC
topic Stevia rebaudiana
sucralose
neotame
Malpighia emarginata DC
description This paper aims to evaluate the physicochemical characteristics, sensory acceptance, and purchase intent of acerola nectar sweetened with sucrose and other sweeteners (neotame, sucralose and stevia extracts with 40%, 60%, 80%, and 95% rebaudioside A). The analyses were carried out for pH, soluble solids, total titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, and colorimetry (L*a*b). The acceptance test was performed by 120 consumers who evaluated the appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall impression of the samples using a 9-cm unstructured hedonic scale. Furthermore, the consumers were asked to rate overall purchase intent along the scale anchored with (1) "would definitely not purchase" to (5) "would definitely purchase." The results were evaluated using analysis of variance/Tukey test and the internal preference mapping technique. The acerola nectar samples did not differ significantly (p>0.05) between themselves in terms of vitamin C content and total titratable acidity. As for appearance and aroma, there was no significant difference (p>0.05) between the samples, and as for flavor and overall impression, the most accepted samples were those with sucrose and sucralose. The internal preference mapping indicated that the most accepted samples were those with sucrose, sucralose, and neotame were. The highest frequency of positive purchase intent scores was observed for sucrose and sucralose.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0101-20612013000400003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0101-20612013000400003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology v.33 n.4 2013
reponame:Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron:SBCTA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
instacron_str SBCTA
institution SBCTA
reponame_str Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
collection Food Science and Technology (Campinas)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Food Science and Technology (Campinas) - Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos (SBCTA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista@sbcta.org.br
_version_ 1752126318154088448