Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000400013 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to compare a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method combined with selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth (PCR-RVB) with standard microbiological techniques (SMT) for the generic detection of Salmonella in samples of porcine origin. Two hundred sixty eight field samples consisting of 42 sets of pooled porcine mandibular lymph nodes and tonsils, 44 samples of intestinal content, 38 pork sausage meat samples and 144 samples of feed collected from swine farms were submitted to the PCR-RVB and SMT protocols. Salmonella was detected in 54 samples using the PCR-RVB assay and in 42 samples by SMT, three of the SMT Salmonella-positive samples (one each of S. Derby, S. Panama and S. Typhimurium) being Salmonella-negative by PCR-RVB. For the PCR-RVB method 15 Salmonella-positive samples were negative by SMT, a significant difference according to the Mac Nemar's chi-squared test (p=0.0153). Subsequent serological typing of the SMT isolates showed the following Salmonella serovars, the number of positive samples being given in parentheses: Typhimurium (12); Bredeney (10); Panama (5); Saint-paul (5); Minnesota (3); Mbandaka (2); Derby (1); Enteritidis (1); Orion (1) and Salmonella sp. (2). We concluded that, although the use of both PCR-RVB and SMT increased the number of positive samples, the PCR-RVB, due to its higher sensitivity and greater speed in giving results, can be implemented to detect Salmonella in samples of porcine origin. |
id |
SBM-1_07a26f4007efce35d50571fabb09dedc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1517-83822005000400013 |
network_acronym_str |
SBM-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniquesdetectionPCRporkSalmonellaswineThe aim of this study was to compare a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method combined with selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth (PCR-RVB) with standard microbiological techniques (SMT) for the generic detection of Salmonella in samples of porcine origin. Two hundred sixty eight field samples consisting of 42 sets of pooled porcine mandibular lymph nodes and tonsils, 44 samples of intestinal content, 38 pork sausage meat samples and 144 samples of feed collected from swine farms were submitted to the PCR-RVB and SMT protocols. Salmonella was detected in 54 samples using the PCR-RVB assay and in 42 samples by SMT, three of the SMT Salmonella-positive samples (one each of S. Derby, S. Panama and S. Typhimurium) being Salmonella-negative by PCR-RVB. For the PCR-RVB method 15 Salmonella-positive samples were negative by SMT, a significant difference according to the Mac Nemar's chi-squared test (p=0.0153). Subsequent serological typing of the SMT isolates showed the following Salmonella serovars, the number of positive samples being given in parentheses: Typhimurium (12); Bredeney (10); Panama (5); Saint-paul (5); Minnesota (3); Mbandaka (2); Derby (1); Enteritidis (1); Orion (1) and Salmonella sp. (2). We concluded that, although the use of both PCR-RVB and SMT increased the number of positive samples, the PCR-RVB, due to its higher sensitivity and greater speed in giving results, can be implemented to detect Salmonella in samples of porcine origin.Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia2005-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000400013Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.36 n.4 2005reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiologyinstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)instacron:SBM10.1590/S1517-83822005000400013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastagna,Sandra Maria FerrazMuller,MonikaMacagnan,MarisaRodenbusch,Carla RosaneCanal,Cláudio WageckCardoso,Marisaeng2006-05-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1517-83822005000400013Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjm/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br1678-44051517-8382opendoar:2006-05-10T00:00Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
title |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
spellingShingle |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques Castagna,Sandra Maria Ferraz detection PCR pork Salmonella swine |
title_short |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
title_full |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
title_fullStr |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
title_sort |
Detection of Salmonella sp. from porcine origin: a comparison between a PCR method and standard microbiological techniques |
author |
Castagna,Sandra Maria Ferraz |
author_facet |
Castagna,Sandra Maria Ferraz Muller,Monika Macagnan,Marisa Rodenbusch,Carla Rosane Canal,Cláudio Wageck Cardoso,Marisa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Muller,Monika Macagnan,Marisa Rodenbusch,Carla Rosane Canal,Cláudio Wageck Cardoso,Marisa |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castagna,Sandra Maria Ferraz Muller,Monika Macagnan,Marisa Rodenbusch,Carla Rosane Canal,Cláudio Wageck Cardoso,Marisa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
detection PCR pork Salmonella swine |
topic |
detection PCR pork Salmonella swine |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method combined with selective enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth (PCR-RVB) with standard microbiological techniques (SMT) for the generic detection of Salmonella in samples of porcine origin. Two hundred sixty eight field samples consisting of 42 sets of pooled porcine mandibular lymph nodes and tonsils, 44 samples of intestinal content, 38 pork sausage meat samples and 144 samples of feed collected from swine farms were submitted to the PCR-RVB and SMT protocols. Salmonella was detected in 54 samples using the PCR-RVB assay and in 42 samples by SMT, three of the SMT Salmonella-positive samples (one each of S. Derby, S. Panama and S. Typhimurium) being Salmonella-negative by PCR-RVB. For the PCR-RVB method 15 Salmonella-positive samples were negative by SMT, a significant difference according to the Mac Nemar's chi-squared test (p=0.0153). Subsequent serological typing of the SMT isolates showed the following Salmonella serovars, the number of positive samples being given in parentheses: Typhimurium (12); Bredeney (10); Panama (5); Saint-paul (5); Minnesota (3); Mbandaka (2); Derby (1); Enteritidis (1); Orion (1) and Salmonella sp. (2). We concluded that, although the use of both PCR-RVB and SMT increased the number of positive samples, the PCR-RVB, due to its higher sensitivity and greater speed in giving results, can be implemented to detect Salmonella in samples of porcine origin. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000400013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1517-83822005000400013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1517-83822005000400013 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology v.36 n.4 2005 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Microbiology instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) instacron:SBM |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
instacron_str |
SBM |
institution |
SBM |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology - Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia (SBM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjm@sbmicrobiologia.org.br||mbmartin@usp.br |
_version_ |
1752122200521965568 |