Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romero,Frederico R.
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Broglio,Marcos, Pires,Silvio R., Roca,Roberto F., Guibu,Ione A., Perez,Marjo D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200005
Resumo: INTRODUCTION: Urogenital neoplasias frequently progress with obstructive uropathy due to local spreading or pelvic metastases. The urinary obstruction must be immediately relieved in order to avoid deterioration in these patients. The percutaneous nephrostomy is a safe and effective method for relief the obstruction; however the indications of such procedures have been questioned in patients with poor prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed with 43 patients (29 female and 14 male) with urogenital neoplasias who were undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy during a 54-month period. The median age was 52 years. The primary tumoral site was the uterine cervix in 53.5% of patients, the bladder in 23.3%, the prostate in 11.6% and other sites in 11.6%. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 42.3% of the patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Thirty-nine per cent of the patients died during the hospitalization period due to advanced neoplasia. The mortality rate was higher in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.006), in patients over 52 years of age (p = 0.03) and in those who required hemodialysis before the procedure (p = 0.02). Thirty-two per cent of the patients survived long enough to undergo some form of treatment focused on the primary tumor. The survival rate was 40% at 6 months and 24.2% at 12 months. The percentage of the lifetime spent in hospitalization was 17.7%. The survival rate was higher in patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix (p = 0.007) and in patients with 52 years of age or less (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Morbidity was high in this patient group; however, the majority of patients could be discharged from hospital and followed at home. Patients under 52 years of age and patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix benefited most from the percutaneous nephrostomy when compared to patients with hormone therapy-refractory prostate cancer, bladder cancer or over 52 years of age.
id SBU-1_be8f9cfca0ab602984a5c0b4e4d524ab
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382005000200005
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasiasnephrostomypercutaneousureteral obstructioncervix neoplasmsbladder neoplasmsprostatic neoplasmsINTRODUCTION: Urogenital neoplasias frequently progress with obstructive uropathy due to local spreading or pelvic metastases. The urinary obstruction must be immediately relieved in order to avoid deterioration in these patients. The percutaneous nephrostomy is a safe and effective method for relief the obstruction; however the indications of such procedures have been questioned in patients with poor prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed with 43 patients (29 female and 14 male) with urogenital neoplasias who were undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy during a 54-month period. The median age was 52 years. The primary tumoral site was the uterine cervix in 53.5% of patients, the bladder in 23.3%, the prostate in 11.6% and other sites in 11.6%. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 42.3% of the patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Thirty-nine per cent of the patients died during the hospitalization period due to advanced neoplasia. The mortality rate was higher in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.006), in patients over 52 years of age (p = 0.03) and in those who required hemodialysis before the procedure (p = 0.02). Thirty-two per cent of the patients survived long enough to undergo some form of treatment focused on the primary tumor. The survival rate was 40% at 6 months and 24.2% at 12 months. The percentage of the lifetime spent in hospitalization was 17.7%. The survival rate was higher in patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix (p = 0.007) and in patients with 52 years of age or less (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Morbidity was high in this patient group; however, the majority of patients could be discharged from hospital and followed at home. Patients under 52 years of age and patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix benefited most from the percutaneous nephrostomy when compared to patients with hormone therapy-refractory prostate cancer, bladder cancer or over 52 years of age.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2005-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200005International braz j urol v.31 n.2 2005reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382005000200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRomero,Frederico R.Broglio,MarcosPires,Silvio R.Roca,Roberto F.Guibu,Ione A.Perez,Marjo D.eng2005-06-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382005000200005Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2005-06-21T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
title Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
spellingShingle Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
Romero,Frederico R.
nephrostomy
percutaneous
ureteral obstruction
cervix neoplasms
bladder neoplasms
prostatic neoplasms
title_short Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
title_full Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
title_fullStr Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
title_full_unstemmed Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
title_sort Indications for percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to malignant urogenital neoplasias
author Romero,Frederico R.
author_facet Romero,Frederico R.
Broglio,Marcos
Pires,Silvio R.
Roca,Roberto F.
Guibu,Ione A.
Perez,Marjo D.
author_role author
author2 Broglio,Marcos
Pires,Silvio R.
Roca,Roberto F.
Guibu,Ione A.
Perez,Marjo D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romero,Frederico R.
Broglio,Marcos
Pires,Silvio R.
Roca,Roberto F.
Guibu,Ione A.
Perez,Marjo D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv nephrostomy
percutaneous
ureteral obstruction
cervix neoplasms
bladder neoplasms
prostatic neoplasms
topic nephrostomy
percutaneous
ureteral obstruction
cervix neoplasms
bladder neoplasms
prostatic neoplasms
description INTRODUCTION: Urogenital neoplasias frequently progress with obstructive uropathy due to local spreading or pelvic metastases. The urinary obstruction must be immediately relieved in order to avoid deterioration in these patients. The percutaneous nephrostomy is a safe and effective method for relief the obstruction; however the indications of such procedures have been questioned in patients with poor prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed with 43 patients (29 female and 14 male) with urogenital neoplasias who were undergoing percutaneous nephrostomy during a 54-month period. The median age was 52 years. The primary tumoral site was the uterine cervix in 53.5% of patients, the bladder in 23.3%, the prostate in 11.6% and other sites in 11.6%. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred in 42.3% of the patients. There was no procedure-related mortality. Thirty-nine per cent of the patients died during the hospitalization period due to advanced neoplasia. The mortality rate was higher in patients with prostate cancer (p = 0.006), in patients over 52 years of age (p = 0.03) and in those who required hemodialysis before the procedure (p = 0.02). Thirty-two per cent of the patients survived long enough to undergo some form of treatment focused on the primary tumor. The survival rate was 40% at 6 months and 24.2% at 12 months. The percentage of the lifetime spent in hospitalization was 17.7%. The survival rate was higher in patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix (p = 0.007) and in patients with 52 years of age or less (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Morbidity was high in this patient group; however, the majority of patients could be discharged from hospital and followed at home. Patients under 52 years of age and patients with neoplasia of the uterine cervix benefited most from the percutaneous nephrostomy when compared to patients with hormone therapy-refractory prostate cancer, bladder cancer or over 52 years of age.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382005000200005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382005000200005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.31 n.2 2005
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318069369012224