HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pazeto,Cristiano Linck
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Baccaglini,Willy, Tourinho-Barbosa,Rafael Rocha, Glina,Sidney, Cathelineau,Xavier, Sanchez-Salas,Rafael
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000601094
Resumo: ABSTRACT Introduction: The health-related QoL is a patient-centered evaluation covering several aspects. This evaluation seems to be particularly important in patients submitted to radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion with ileal conduit (IC) or a neobladder (NB). Objective: Review all recent data comparing QoL outcomes after radical cystectomy with NB and IC diversions. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement in December 2018. All articles published from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2018, were included. A study was considered relevant if it compared QoL outcomes using validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, FACT-G, FACT-BL, FACT-VCI, and BCI). Evidence Synthesis: In 11 included studies, a total of 1389 participants were accounted (730 NB and 659 IC cases). The studies were conducted in 8 different countries, two were prospective, and none was randomized. There were two studies favoring results with a neobladder, 3 with incontinent diversion and 6 with no differences. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was the most used instrument (5 studies) followed by FACT VCI and BCI (3 studies each). Given the heterogeneity of data and lack of prospective studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusion: No superiority of one urinary diversion was characterized. It seems that the choice must be individualized with an extensive preoperative orientation of the patient and their relatives. That will probably influence how the patient accepts the new condition.
id SBU-1_3644cdf9e40d6494c20d9dbe3ac05478
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382019000601094
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literatureCystectomySystematic Review [Publication Type]Urinary DiversionABSTRACT Introduction: The health-related QoL is a patient-centered evaluation covering several aspects. This evaluation seems to be particularly important in patients submitted to radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion with ileal conduit (IC) or a neobladder (NB). Objective: Review all recent data comparing QoL outcomes after radical cystectomy with NB and IC diversions. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement in December 2018. All articles published from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2018, were included. A study was considered relevant if it compared QoL outcomes using validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, FACT-G, FACT-BL, FACT-VCI, and BCI). Evidence Synthesis: In 11 included studies, a total of 1389 participants were accounted (730 NB and 659 IC cases). The studies were conducted in 8 different countries, two were prospective, and none was randomized. There were two studies favoring results with a neobladder, 3 with incontinent diversion and 6 with no differences. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was the most used instrument (5 studies) followed by FACT VCI and BCI (3 studies each). Given the heterogeneity of data and lack of prospective studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusion: No superiority of one urinary diversion was characterized. It seems that the choice must be individualized with an extensive preoperative orientation of the patient and their relatives. That will probably influence how the patient accepts the new condition.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2019-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000601094International braz j urol v.45 n.6 2019reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0858info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPazeto,Cristiano LinckBaccaglini,WillyTourinho-Barbosa,Rafael RochaGlina,SidneyCathelineau,XavierSanchez-Salas,Rafaeleng2019-12-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382019000601094Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2019-12-12T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
title HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
spellingShingle HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
Pazeto,Cristiano Linck
Cystectomy
Systematic Review [Publication Type]
Urinary Diversion
title_short HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
title_full HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
title_fullStr HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
title_full_unstemmed HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
title_sort HRQOL related to urinary diversion in Radical Cystectomy: a systematic review of recent literature
author Pazeto,Cristiano Linck
author_facet Pazeto,Cristiano Linck
Baccaglini,Willy
Tourinho-Barbosa,Rafael Rocha
Glina,Sidney
Cathelineau,Xavier
Sanchez-Salas,Rafael
author_role author
author2 Baccaglini,Willy
Tourinho-Barbosa,Rafael Rocha
Glina,Sidney
Cathelineau,Xavier
Sanchez-Salas,Rafael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pazeto,Cristiano Linck
Baccaglini,Willy
Tourinho-Barbosa,Rafael Rocha
Glina,Sidney
Cathelineau,Xavier
Sanchez-Salas,Rafael
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cystectomy
Systematic Review [Publication Type]
Urinary Diversion
topic Cystectomy
Systematic Review [Publication Type]
Urinary Diversion
description ABSTRACT Introduction: The health-related QoL is a patient-centered evaluation covering several aspects. This evaluation seems to be particularly important in patients submitted to radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion with ileal conduit (IC) or a neobladder (NB). Objective: Review all recent data comparing QoL outcomes after radical cystectomy with NB and IC diversions. Evidence Acquisition: A systematic search in PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement in December 2018. All articles published from January 01, 2012 to December 31, 2018, were included. A study was considered relevant if it compared QoL outcomes using validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ C30, FACT-G, FACT-BL, FACT-VCI, and BCI). Evidence Synthesis: In 11 included studies, a total of 1389 participants were accounted (730 NB and 659 IC cases). The studies were conducted in 8 different countries, two were prospective, and none was randomized. There were two studies favoring results with a neobladder, 3 with incontinent diversion and 6 with no differences. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 was the most used instrument (5 studies) followed by FACT VCI and BCI (3 studies each). Given the heterogeneity of data and lack of prospective studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Conclusion: No superiority of one urinary diversion was characterized. It seems that the choice must be individualized with an extensive preoperative orientation of the patient and their relatives. That will probably influence how the patient accepts the new condition.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000601094
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000601094
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0858
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.45 n.6 2019
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318077201874944