CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lacerda, Bruno Amaro
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Müller, Juliana Martins de Sá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352
Resumo: This paper discusses the possible recognition of constitutional gaps and loopholes, using the perspective of law as integrity. The objective of this study is to deliberate about the connection between constitutional gaps and integrity using a famous legal controversy: the constitutional viability of same-sex unions, decided by the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 4277. Therefore, what we aim to show is that, while examining the issue, the rulings of the Supreme Court´s and other courts were falsely justified based on answers for the constitutional gap, which escaped the limits of appropriate judicial reasoning.
id UEL-6_5d17df4c8e9e3b5f73e06688710e0922
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22352
network_acronym_str UEL-6
network_name_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASEAs lacunas constitucionais e o Direito como integridade: análise de um caso concretoGapsIntegrityJudicial activismLacunasIntegridadeAtivismo judicialThis paper discusses the possible recognition of constitutional gaps and loopholes, using the perspective of law as integrity. The objective of this study is to deliberate about the connection between constitutional gaps and integrity using a famous legal controversy: the constitutional viability of same-sex unions, decided by the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 4277. Therefore, what we aim to show is that, while examining the issue, the rulings of the Supreme Court´s and other courts were falsely justified based on answers for the constitutional gap, which escaped the limits of appropriate judicial reasoning.Este artigo discute a possibilidade de reconhecimento de lacunas constitucionais a partir de uma visão do Direito como integridade. A proposta é pensar a relação entre lacunas e integridade a partir de uma controvérsia jurídica bastante conhecida, a referente à viabilidade constitucional das uniões estáveis entre pessoas do mesmo sexo, reconhecidas pelo STF na ação direta de inconstitucionalidade nº 4277. O intuito é mostrar que as decisões proferidas, incluindo a do STF e as de outros Tribunais que o precederam no exame da questão, foram erroneamente justificadas com o recurso à ideia de preenchimento de uma lacuna, escapando assim aos limites de uma argumentação judicialmente adequada.Universidade Estadual de Londrina2016-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfapplication/mswordhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/2235210.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n1p102Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 1 (2016); 102-1182178-81891415-6490reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)instacron:UELporhttps://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352/18845https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352/36908Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iurisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLacerda, Bruno AmaroMüller, Juliana Martins de Sá2016-05-04T12:59:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22352Revistahttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iurisPUBhttps://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/oairevistamdireito@uel.br2178-81891415-6490opendoar:2016-05-04T12:59:11Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
As lacunas constitucionais e o Direito como integridade: análise de um caso concreto
title CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
spellingShingle CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
Lacerda, Bruno Amaro
Gaps
Integrity
Judicial activism
Lacunas
Integridade
Ativismo judicial
title_short CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
title_full CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
title_fullStr CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
title_full_unstemmed CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
title_sort CONSTITUTIONAL GAPS AND THE LAW AS INTEGRITY: ANALYSIS OF A CASE
author Lacerda, Bruno Amaro
author_facet Lacerda, Bruno Amaro
Müller, Juliana Martins de Sá
author_role author
author2 Müller, Juliana Martins de Sá
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lacerda, Bruno Amaro
Müller, Juliana Martins de Sá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gaps
Integrity
Judicial activism
Lacunas
Integridade
Ativismo judicial
topic Gaps
Integrity
Judicial activism
Lacunas
Integridade
Ativismo judicial
description This paper discusses the possible recognition of constitutional gaps and loopholes, using the perspective of law as integrity. The objective of this study is to deliberate about the connection between constitutional gaps and integrity using a famous legal controversy: the constitutional viability of same-sex unions, decided by the Brazilian Supreme Court on the Direct Unconstitutionality Action No. 4277. Therefore, what we aim to show is that, while examining the issue, the rulings of the Supreme Court´s and other courts were falsely justified based on answers for the constitutional gap, which escaped the limits of appropriate judicial reasoning.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-04-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352
10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n1p102
url https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352
identifier_str_mv 10.5433/2178-8189.2016v20n1p102
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352/18845
https://ojs.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/22352/36908
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Scientia Iuris
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Londrina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris; v. 20 n. 1 (2016); 102-118
2178-8189
1415-6490
reponame:Scientia Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron:UEL
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
instacron_str UEL
institution UEL
reponame_str Scientia Iuris (Online)
collection Scientia Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Iuris (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistamdireito@uel.br
_version_ 1750315385590120448

Registros relacionados