Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2005 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3241 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII - GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>;0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>;0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials. |
id |
USP-17_548eddbc4263fda25e0245ed818e69c8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3241 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations Avaliação clínica de restaurações compostas ou complexas com a técnica do ART Cimentos de ionômero de vidroTratamento Restaurador AtraumáticoGlass ionomer cementsAtraumatic Restorative Treatment The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII - GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>;0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>;0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o comportamento de dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro: um de alta viscosidade (Ketac Molar - ESPE) e um modificado por resina (Fuji VIII - GC) em restaurações envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies dentárias, confeccionadas pela técnica do Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático. Sessenta restaurações (30 com cada material) foram inseridas em estudantes (9-16 anos) por dois operadores. Após 6 meses, dois examinadores independentes avaliaram as restaurações de acordo com os critérios utilizados em trabalhos prévios semelhantes. Os dados foram analisados pelos testes de McNemar e Fischer. A porcentagem de sucesso do tratamento foi de 98,3%. Uma restauração (Ketac Molar) foi substituída por outro material e classificada como falha. As porcentagens de sucesso das restaurações foram de 100% e 96,6% para o Fuji VIII e Ketac Molar, respectivamente. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante no sucesso das restaurações entre o baseline e 6 meses (p>;0,05). Da mesma forma, não houve diferença estatística entre os materiais, tipos de cavidade ou entre operadores.(p>;0,05). A técnica ART foi altamente apropriada e efetiva em restaurações envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies, após 6 meses. Os resultados mostraram um comportamento promissor com ambos os materiais. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2005-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/324110.1590/S1678-77572005000100004Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2005); 15-19 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2005); 15-19 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 13 n. 1 (2005); 15-19 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3241/3931Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCefaly, Daniela Francisca GigoBarata, Terezinha de Jesus EstevesTapety, Celiane Mary CarneiroBresciani, EduardoNavarro, Maria Fidela de Lima2012-04-27T11:49:19Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3241Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:49:19Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations Avaliação clínica de restaurações compostas ou complexas com a técnica do ART |
title |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
spellingShingle |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático Glass ionomer cements Atraumatic Restorative Treatment |
title_short |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
title_full |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
title_fullStr |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
title_sort |
Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations |
author |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo |
author_facet |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Tapety, Celiane Mary Carneiro Bresciani, Eduardo Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Tapety, Celiane Mary Carneiro Bresciani, Eduardo Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cefaly, Daniela Francisca Gigo Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves Tapety, Celiane Mary Carneiro Bresciani, Eduardo Navarro, Maria Fidela de Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático Glass ionomer cements Atraumatic Restorative Treatment |
topic |
Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático Glass ionomer cements Atraumatic Restorative Treatment |
description |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII - GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>;0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>;0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3241 10.1590/S1678-77572005000100004 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3241 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S1678-77572005000100004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3241/3931 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2005 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2005); 15-19 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2005); 15-19 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 13 n. 1 (2005); 15-19 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1787713188856332288 |