Focus group: some notes on practical issues

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzeder
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/54052
Resumo: This article aims to contribute, with some notes on practical issues, to more easily understand the focus group technique. As it is introductory, its plan is very simple, briefly addressing the definition and technique characteristics and some basic procedures for its use, the most frequently considered advantages and disadvantages, and finally some clues to the data analysis.
id UFRGS-26_0fb7975ccc5b2425b80c362eb00a2a16
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/54052
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Focus group: some notes on practical issuesGrupo focal: algumas notas sobre questões práticasGrupos FocaisPesquisa QualitativaTécnica de Pesquisa.Focus GroupQualitative ResearchResearch Technique.This article aims to contribute, with some notes on practical issues, to more easily understand the focus group technique. As it is introductory, its plan is very simple, briefly addressing the definition and technique characteristics and some basic procedures for its use, the most frequently considered advantages and disadvantages, and finally some clues to the data analysis.Este texto pretende contribuir com algumas notas sobre questões práticas para facilitar o entendimento da técnica de grupo focal. Sendo ele introdutório, o seu plano é simples, abordando uma breve definição e caracterização da técnica, alguns procedimentos básicos para a sua utilização, as vantagens e desvantagens consideradas mais frequentemente e, finalmente, algumas pistas para a análise dos dados.UFRGS2015-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/5405210.22456/1982-5269.54052Revista Debates; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2015): Metodologia(s) nas Ciências Sociais: um balanço necessário; 49-59Revista Debates; v. 9 n. 1 (2015): Metodologia(s) nas Ciências Sociais: um balanço necessário; 49-591982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/54052/33511Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzederinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:20Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/54052Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:20Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Focus group: some notes on practical issues
Grupo focal: algumas notas sobre questões práticas
title Focus group: some notes on practical issues
spellingShingle Focus group: some notes on practical issues
Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzeder
Grupos Focais
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Técnica de Pesquisa.
Focus Group
Qualitative Research
Research Technique.
title_short Focus group: some notes on practical issues
title_full Focus group: some notes on practical issues
title_fullStr Focus group: some notes on practical issues
title_full_unstemmed Focus group: some notes on practical issues
title_sort Focus group: some notes on practical issues
author Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzeder
author_facet Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzeder
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Keil, Ivete Leocádia Manetzeder
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Grupos Focais
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Técnica de Pesquisa.
Focus Group
Qualitative Research
Research Technique.
topic Grupos Focais
Pesquisa Qualitativa
Técnica de Pesquisa.
Focus Group
Qualitative Research
Research Technique.
description This article aims to contribute, with some notes on practical issues, to more easily understand the focus group technique. As it is introductory, its plan is very simple, briefly addressing the definition and technique characteristics and some basic procedures for its use, the most frequently considered advantages and disadvantages, and finally some clues to the data analysis.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-04-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/54052
10.22456/1982-5269.54052
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/54052
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.54052
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/54052/33511
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2015): Metodologia(s) nas Ciências Sociais: um balanço necessário; 49-59
Revista Debates; v. 9 n. 1 (2015): Metodologia(s) nas Ciências Sociais: um balanço necessário; 49-59
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1754643108332568577