Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pozobon, Rejane de Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Ribeiro, Andressa Dembogurski
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/71107
Resumo: This study aims, through a brief literature review, to approach the concept of publicness (CASAQUI, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2011, 2014; ROMEYER, 2015) used in the organizational and health fields to the political field. To exemplify this approach, we will analyze, through the theory of argumentation (BRETON, 2003), the pronouncements of president Dilma Rousseff before and after the opening of the impeachment voting proceedings in the House of Representatives, which were broadcasted on the Facebook social online network. We realize that, to adapt to media logics, the politician makes use of argumentative strategies and incorporate the art of representation and staging, acquiring features that were not present in the previous times.
id UFRGS-26_1d3d69b0e9b9c3fdbc1b0e3632dee20f
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/71107
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachmentA publicização da política: estratégias argumentativas de Dilma Rousseff contra o impeachmentPublicizaçãopolíticaDilma RousseffimpeachmentPublicnessPolicyDilma RousseffImpeachmentThis study aims, through a brief literature review, to approach the concept of publicness (CASAQUI, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2011, 2014; ROMEYER, 2015) used in the organizational and health fields to the political field. To exemplify this approach, we will analyze, through the theory of argumentation (BRETON, 2003), the pronouncements of president Dilma Rousseff before and after the opening of the impeachment voting proceedings in the House of Representatives, which were broadcasted on the Facebook social online network. We realize that, to adapt to media logics, the politician makes use of argumentative strategies and incorporate the art of representation and staging, acquiring features that were not present in the previous times.Este estudo busca, através de uma breve revisão bibliográfica, aproximar o conceito de publicização (CASAQUI, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2011, 2014; ROMEYER, 2015) utilizado no campo organizacional e da saúde ao campo político. Para exemplificarmos esta aproximação, analisaremos, através da teoria da argumentação (BRETON, 2003), os pronunciamentos da presidenta Dilma Rousseff pré e pós votação da abertura do processo de impeachment na Câmara dos Deputados, que foram veiculados na rede social digital Facebook. Percebemos que, ao se adaptar à lógica midiática, a política faz uso de estratégias argumentativas e incorpora a arte da representação e da encenação, ganhando características que não estavam presentes em momentos anteriores.UFRGS2017-04-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/7110710.22456/1982-5269.71107Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2017): Dossiê Política e Políticas Públicas; 119-136Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 1 (2017): Dossiê Política e Políticas Públicas; 119-1361982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/71107/41076Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPozobon, Rejane de OliveiraRibeiro, Andressa Dembogurski2017-08-29T14:02:57Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/71107Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2017-08-29T14:02:57Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
A publicização da política: estratégias argumentativas de Dilma Rousseff contra o impeachment
title Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
spellingShingle Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
Pozobon, Rejane de Oliveira
Publicização
política
Dilma Rousseff
impeachment
Publicness
Policy
Dilma Rousseff
Impeachment
title_short Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
title_full Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
title_fullStr Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
title_full_unstemmed Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
title_sort Policy publicness: argumentative strategies of Dilma Rousseff against impeachment
author Pozobon, Rejane de Oliveira
author_facet Pozobon, Rejane de Oliveira
Ribeiro, Andressa Dembogurski
author_role author
author2 Ribeiro, Andressa Dembogurski
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pozobon, Rejane de Oliveira
Ribeiro, Andressa Dembogurski
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Publicização
política
Dilma Rousseff
impeachment
Publicness
Policy
Dilma Rousseff
Impeachment
topic Publicização
política
Dilma Rousseff
impeachment
Publicness
Policy
Dilma Rousseff
Impeachment
description This study aims, through a brief literature review, to approach the concept of publicness (CASAQUI, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2011, 2014; ROMEYER, 2015) used in the organizational and health fields to the political field. To exemplify this approach, we will analyze, through the theory of argumentation (BRETON, 2003), the pronouncements of president Dilma Rousseff before and after the opening of the impeachment voting proceedings in the House of Representatives, which were broadcasted on the Facebook social online network. We realize that, to adapt to media logics, the politician makes use of argumentative strategies and incorporate the art of representation and staging, acquiring features that were not present in the previous times.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/71107
10.22456/1982-5269.71107
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/71107
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.71107
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/71107/41076
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Debates
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 11 Núm. 1 (2017): Dossiê Política e Políticas Públicas; 119-136
Revista Debates; v. 11 n. 1 (2017): Dossiê Política e Políticas Públicas; 119-136
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1754643108765630464