A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
Texto Completo: | http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/13750 |
Resumo: | The present thesis intends to defend, mainly, the possibility of differentiation between Law and Moral proposed by the tradition of legal positivism. In this way, we will defend what is now called ―exclusive legal positivism‖. In a second moment, the ―normative‖ view will be added to this positivism. For contemporary legal positivists, it is true that the separation thesis does not mean that law does not have connections, necessary or not, to morality. What the contemporary legal positivists assert is that the existence and validity of law can not depend on moral criteria. The existence and validity of law depend only on social facts. Which brings us to the question of the sources of law. We will affirm, therefore, that the thesis that conjugates or names legal positivism is the thesis of social sources of law. The separation thesis is at best a sub-thesis of legal positivism. The first chapter deals with the ―Evolution of Legal Positivism‖, seeking to trace a historical course of the debate between law and morals and the characterization and changes of the two main schools of legal thinking: natural law theory and legal positivism. Thus, we begin with the reference to Greek culture and we come to the current debate between inclusivists and exclusivists. The second chapter delves deeper into the first in some ways. It deals specifically with the ―Challenges of Legal Positivism‖, that is, the arguments of its main opponent - Ronald Dworkin - as well as the counter-arguments and renewal of legal positivism in the new currents that have been established: exclusive legal positivism, inclusive legal positivism and (exclusive) normative legal positivism. The third chapter is the broadest and addresses ―The relationship between law and morality‖ from both the analytical and normative perspectives. It seeks from the influences of the first utilitarians on legal positivism, going through the importance of the distinction between positive moral and critical moral and ending with the replacement of the problem of the separation of law and moral in legal positivism. Finally, according to the arguments of exclusive legal positivism, especially the practical difference thesis, we opt for the best formulation that appears in the title of this thesis: the differentiation between law and morality from the sources thesis. |
id |
UFSM_4855442c05e608cab7bcd8d151f04c7f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/13750 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
2018-07-11T18:48:53Z2018-07-11T18:48:53Z2017-04-07http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/13750The present thesis intends to defend, mainly, the possibility of differentiation between Law and Moral proposed by the tradition of legal positivism. In this way, we will defend what is now called ―exclusive legal positivism‖. In a second moment, the ―normative‖ view will be added to this positivism. For contemporary legal positivists, it is true that the separation thesis does not mean that law does not have connections, necessary or not, to morality. What the contemporary legal positivists assert is that the existence and validity of law can not depend on moral criteria. The existence and validity of law depend only on social facts. Which brings us to the question of the sources of law. We will affirm, therefore, that the thesis that conjugates or names legal positivism is the thesis of social sources of law. The separation thesis is at best a sub-thesis of legal positivism. The first chapter deals with the ―Evolution of Legal Positivism‖, seeking to trace a historical course of the debate between law and morals and the characterization and changes of the two main schools of legal thinking: natural law theory and legal positivism. Thus, we begin with the reference to Greek culture and we come to the current debate between inclusivists and exclusivists. The second chapter delves deeper into the first in some ways. It deals specifically with the ―Challenges of Legal Positivism‖, that is, the arguments of its main opponent - Ronald Dworkin - as well as the counter-arguments and renewal of legal positivism in the new currents that have been established: exclusive legal positivism, inclusive legal positivism and (exclusive) normative legal positivism. The third chapter is the broadest and addresses ―The relationship between law and morality‖ from both the analytical and normative perspectives. It seeks from the influences of the first utilitarians on legal positivism, going through the importance of the distinction between positive moral and critical moral and ending with the replacement of the problem of the separation of law and moral in legal positivism. Finally, according to the arguments of exclusive legal positivism, especially the practical difference thesis, we opt for the best formulation that appears in the title of this thesis: the differentiation between law and morality from the sources thesis.A presente tese pretende defender, principalmente, a possibilidade de diferenciação entre direito e moral proposta pela tradição do positivismo jurídico. Neste caminho, defenderemos o que se chama, hoje, ―positivismo jurídico exclusivo‖. Em um segundo momento, será agregado o viés ―normativo‖ a este positivismo. Para os positivistas jurídicos contemporâneos, é certo que a tese da separação não quer dizer que o direito não tenha conexões, necessárias ou não, com a moralidade. O que os positivistas jurídicos contemporâneos afirmam é que a existência e a validade do direito não podem depender de critérios morais. A existência e a validade do direito dependem somente de fatos sociais. O que nos leva à questão das fontes do direito. Afirmaremos, portanto, que a tese que conjuga ou nomina o positivismo jurídico é a tese das fontes sociais do direito. A tese de separação é, no máximo, uma subtese do positivismo jurídico. O primeiro capítulo trata da ―Evolução do Positivismo Jurídico‖, buscando traçar um percurso histórico do debate entre direito e moral e a caracterização e mudanças das duas principais escolas de pensamento jurídico: o jusnaturalismo e o positivismo jurídico. Assim, começamos com a referência à cultura grega e chegamos ao debate atual entre inclusivistas e exclusivistas. O segundo capítulo aprofunda o primeiro em alguns aspectos. Trata, especificamente, dos ―Desafios do Positivismo Jurídico‖, ou seja, dos argumentos do seu principal opositor – Ronald Dworkin – bem como os contra-argumentos e a renovação do positivismo jurídico nas novas correntes que se estabeleceram: positivismo jurídico exclusivo, positivismo jurídico inclusivo e positivismo jurídico (exclusivo) normativo. O terceiro capítulo é o mais amplo e aborda ―As relações entre direito e moral‖ tanto da perspectiva analítica como da normativa. Busca desde as influências dos primeiros utilitaristas no positivismo jurídico, passando pela importância da distinção entre moral positiva e moral crítica e finalizando com a recolocação da problema da separação entre direito e moral no positivismo jurídico. Por fim, conforme os argumentos do positivismo jurídico exclusivo, principalmente a tese da diferença prática, optamos pela melhor formulação que consta no título desta tese: a diferenciação entre direito e moral a partir da tese das fontes.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESporUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaCentro de Ciências Sociais e HumanasPrograma de Pós-Graduação em FilosofiaUFSMBrasilFilosofiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDireitoMoralPositivismo jurídicoPositivismo jurídico exclusivoPositivismo jurídico inclusivoPositivismo jurídico normativoLawMoralsLegal positivismExclusive legal positivismInclusive legal positivismNormative positivismCNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIAA diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídicoThe differentiation between law and moral in the tradition of legal positivisminfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisSautter, Frank Thomashttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760Fonseca, Renato Duartehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579Rocha, Ronai Pires dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6507162920508018Ghidolin, Clodoveohttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3147142162161654Struchiner, Noelhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8897943441824788http://lattes.cnpq.br/8909098378595189Froehlich, Charles Andrade7001000000046007b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e551844ca0b59-ec8f-4585-b918-497db60d312196595b1c-42cb-4a1c-ac4c-826b9e9917462be212e1-48b5-4441-bf5b-ea6f874ebe0ec202a3a9-a979-4de2-9494-02d082744b4ccda141c8-273e-49a8-8701-f9ce392a1d19reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSMORIGINALTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdfTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdfTese de Doutoradoapplication/pdf1066394http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf3db9a67d4f6d81277e48c88523eabe5bMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8804http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/2/license_rdfc1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ffMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81956http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/3/license.txt2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075dfMD53TEXTTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.txtTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain450623http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.txt734945c8fbada6ebe04cff285425efbbMD54THUMBNAILTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.jpgTES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg4453http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.jpg52e95d480e94d33574939d99b06a1e90MD551/137502022-07-01 11:02:39.19oai:repositorio.ufsm.br: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 Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/ONGhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.comopendoar:2022-07-01T14:02:39Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv |
The differentiation between law and moral in the tradition of legal positivism |
title |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
spellingShingle |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico Froehlich, Charles Andrade Direito Moral Positivismo jurídico Positivismo jurídico exclusivo Positivismo jurídico inclusivo Positivismo jurídico normativo Law Morals Legal positivism Exclusive legal positivism Inclusive legal positivism Normative positivism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
title_short |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
title_full |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
title_fullStr |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
title_full_unstemmed |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
title_sort |
A diferenciação entre direito e moral na tradição do positivismo jurídico |
author |
Froehlich, Charles Andrade |
author_facet |
Froehlich, Charles Andrade |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2804652028967760 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Renato Duarte |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/9762748021331579 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Ronai Pires da |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/6507162920508018 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Ghidolin, Clodoveo |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3147142162161654 |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Struchiner, Noel |
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8897943441824788 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8909098378595189 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Froehlich, Charles Andrade |
contributor_str_mv |
Sautter, Frank Thomas Fonseca, Renato Duarte Rocha, Ronai Pires da Ghidolin, Clodoveo Struchiner, Noel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito Moral Positivismo jurídico Positivismo jurídico exclusivo Positivismo jurídico inclusivo Positivismo jurídico normativo |
topic |
Direito Moral Positivismo jurídico Positivismo jurídico exclusivo Positivismo jurídico inclusivo Positivismo jurídico normativo Law Morals Legal positivism Exclusive legal positivism Inclusive legal positivism Normative positivism CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Law Morals Legal positivism Exclusive legal positivism Inclusive legal positivism Normative positivism |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA |
description |
The present thesis intends to defend, mainly, the possibility of differentiation between Law and Moral proposed by the tradition of legal positivism. In this way, we will defend what is now called ―exclusive legal positivism‖. In a second moment, the ―normative‖ view will be added to this positivism. For contemporary legal positivists, it is true that the separation thesis does not mean that law does not have connections, necessary or not, to morality. What the contemporary legal positivists assert is that the existence and validity of law can not depend on moral criteria. The existence and validity of law depend only on social facts. Which brings us to the question of the sources of law. We will affirm, therefore, that the thesis that conjugates or names legal positivism is the thesis of social sources of law. The separation thesis is at best a sub-thesis of legal positivism. The first chapter deals with the ―Evolution of Legal Positivism‖, seeking to trace a historical course of the debate between law and morals and the characterization and changes of the two main schools of legal thinking: natural law theory and legal positivism. Thus, we begin with the reference to Greek culture and we come to the current debate between inclusivists and exclusivists. The second chapter delves deeper into the first in some ways. It deals specifically with the ―Challenges of Legal Positivism‖, that is, the arguments of its main opponent - Ronald Dworkin - as well as the counter-arguments and renewal of legal positivism in the new currents that have been established: exclusive legal positivism, inclusive legal positivism and (exclusive) normative legal positivism. The third chapter is the broadest and addresses ―The relationship between law and morality‖ from both the analytical and normative perspectives. It seeks from the influences of the first utilitarians on legal positivism, going through the importance of the distinction between positive moral and critical moral and ending with the replacement of the problem of the separation of law and moral in legal positivism. Finally, according to the arguments of exclusive legal positivism, especially the practical difference thesis, we opt for the best formulation that appears in the title of this thesis: the differentiation between law and morality from the sources thesis. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017-04-07 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-11T18:48:53Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2018-07-11T18:48:53Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/13750 |
url |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/13750 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
700100000004 |
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv |
600 |
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv |
7b4df9b2-c023-4806-81a9-f4f3371e5518 44ca0b59-ec8f-4585-b918-497db60d3121 96595b1c-42cb-4a1c-ac4c-826b9e991746 2be212e1-48b5-4441-bf5b-ea6f874ebe0e c202a3a9-a979-4de2-9494-02d082744b4c cda141c8-273e-49a8-8701-f9ce392a1d19 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UFSM |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Filosofia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/1/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/2/license_rdf http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/3/license.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/4/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.txt http://repositorio.ufsm.br/bitstream/1/13750/5/TES_PPGFILOSOFIA_2017_FROEHLICH_CHARLES.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3db9a67d4f6d81277e48c88523eabe5b c1efe8e24d7281448e873be30ea326ff 2f0571ecee68693bd5cd3f17c1e075df 734945c8fbada6ebe04cff285425efbb 52e95d480e94d33574939d99b06a1e90 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações do UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1791086197007712256 |