FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paixão, Alessandro Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Silva, Debora Pereira, Cabral, Nuria Micheline Meneses
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1478
Resumo: The article analyzes the relation between Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech, a subject that causes intense debates in the Constitutional Courts. Despite the controversy over the matter, these understandings prevail. The first one defends the supremacy of Freedom of Speech by acting in the presentation and selection of ideas, even if they are not accepted by the society, and improving the democratic debate. In the second understanding, human dignity prevails over freedom of speech, rejecting any discourse of intolerance. Communication would be guided by human dignity inscribed in the constitutional norms. It is noted that the analysis of both fundamental rights obtains multiple interpretations. Therefore, all caution is necessary in the limitation of fundamental rights, because although the legal assets may be in apparent conflict, it is common ground that freedom and dignity are relevant to the democratic-constitutional scenario.
id UFV-7_38910aec55da17bf5ef364699e0ef004
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/1478
network_acronym_str UFV-7
network_name_str Revista de Direito
repository_id_str
spelling FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAWLiberdade de expressão e hate speech no estado democrático de direitoFreedom of Speech. Hate Speech. Human Dignity.Liberdade de expressão. Hate Speech. Dignidade Humana.The article analyzes the relation between Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech, a subject that causes intense debates in the Constitutional Courts. Despite the controversy over the matter, these understandings prevail. The first one defends the supremacy of Freedom of Speech by acting in the presentation and selection of ideas, even if they are not accepted by the society, and improving the democratic debate. In the second understanding, human dignity prevails over freedom of speech, rejecting any discourse of intolerance. Communication would be guided by human dignity inscribed in the constitutional norms. It is noted that the analysis of both fundamental rights obtains multiple interpretations. Therefore, all caution is necessary in the limitation of fundamental rights, because although the legal assets may be in apparent conflict, it is common ground that freedom and dignity are relevant to the democratic-constitutional scenario.O artigo analisa a relação entre Liberdade de Expressão e Discurso de Ódio, tema objeto de intensos debates em Cortes Constitucionais. Apesar da controvérsia sobre a matéria, predominam os seguintes entendimentos. O primeiro defende a supremacia da Liberdade de Expressão atuando na apresentação e seleção de ideias, ainda que estas não sejam aceitas pela coletividade, e fortalecendo o debate democrático. Já no segundo entendimento, a dignidade humana prevalece sobre a liberdade de expressão, rechaçando-se qualquer discurso de intolerância. A comunicação seria balizada pela dignidade humana inscrita nas normas constitucionais.  Nota-se que da análise dos dois direitos fundamentais se obtêm múltiplas interpretações. Logo, toda cautela é necessária na limitação de direitos fundamentais, pois embora os bens possam estar em aparente conflito, é pacífico que a liberdade e a dignidade são relevantes para o cenário democrático-constitucional.Universidade Federal de Viçosa2018-08-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/147810.32361/201810011478Journal of Law; Vol. 10 No. 01 (2018); 23Revista de Direito; v. 10 n. 01 (2018); 232527-03891806-8790reponame:Revista de Direitoinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVporhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1478/pdfPaixão, Alessandro GonçalvesSilva, Debora PereiraCabral, Nuria Micheline Menesesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-10-09T17:48:35Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufv.br:article/1478Revistahttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/oairevistadir@ufv.br2527-03891806-8790opendoar:2019-10-09T17:48:35Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
Liberdade de expressão e hate speech no estado democrático de direito
title FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
spellingShingle FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
Paixão, Alessandro Gonçalves
Freedom of Speech. Hate Speech. Human Dignity.
Liberdade de expressão. Hate Speech. Dignidade Humana.
title_short FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
title_full FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
title_fullStr FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
title_full_unstemmed FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
title_sort FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND HATE SPEECH IN THE DEMOCRATIC STATE OF LAW
author Paixão, Alessandro Gonçalves
author_facet Paixão, Alessandro Gonçalves
Silva, Debora Pereira
Cabral, Nuria Micheline Meneses
author_role author
author2 Silva, Debora Pereira
Cabral, Nuria Micheline Meneses
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paixão, Alessandro Gonçalves
Silva, Debora Pereira
Cabral, Nuria Micheline Meneses
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Freedom of Speech. Hate Speech. Human Dignity.
Liberdade de expressão. Hate Speech. Dignidade Humana.
topic Freedom of Speech. Hate Speech. Human Dignity.
Liberdade de expressão. Hate Speech. Dignidade Humana.
description The article analyzes the relation between Freedom of Speech and Hate Speech, a subject that causes intense debates in the Constitutional Courts. Despite the controversy over the matter, these understandings prevail. The first one defends the supremacy of Freedom of Speech by acting in the presentation and selection of ideas, even if they are not accepted by the society, and improving the democratic debate. In the second understanding, human dignity prevails over freedom of speech, rejecting any discourse of intolerance. Communication would be guided by human dignity inscribed in the constitutional norms. It is noted that the analysis of both fundamental rights obtains multiple interpretations. Therefore, all caution is necessary in the limitation of fundamental rights, because although the legal assets may be in apparent conflict, it is common ground that freedom and dignity are relevant to the democratic-constitutional scenario.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-08-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1478
10.32361/201810011478
url https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1478
identifier_str_mv 10.32361/201810011478
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufv.br/revistadir/article/view/1478/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Viçosa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Law; Vol. 10 No. 01 (2018); 23
Revista de Direito; v. 10 n. 01 (2018); 23
2527-0389
1806-8790
reponame:Revista de Direito
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str Revista de Direito
collection Revista de Direito
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadir@ufv.br
_version_ 1754643086856683520