Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Corrêa, Débora M., Carneiro, Antônio P. S., Rosa, Rinamara M., Loterio, Robson, Araújo, Wagner L.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468
Resumo: Maintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections.
id UFV_6113e6650bd0a59bbd97f3bdf59c3da9
oai_identifier_str oai:locus.ufv.br:123456789/23468
network_acronym_str UFV
network_name_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
repository_id_str 2145
spelling Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.Corrêa, Débora M.Carneiro, Antônio P. S.Rosa, Rinamara M.Loterio, RobsonAraújo, Wagner L.2019-02-11T12:44:28Z2019-02-11T12:44:28Z2013-081573-5176https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468Maintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections.engJournal of Applied PhycologyVolume 25, Issue 4, Pages 919– 929, August 2013Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCyanobacteriaPreservation methodsLyophilizationCryopreservationCyanobacterial collectionsComparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strainsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfreponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFVinstname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)instacron:UFVORIGINALartigo.pdfartigo.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf514927https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23468/1/artigo.pdf9157f40c8b8b2f66f274a8dbbfbda69fMD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81748https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23468/2/license.txt8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33MD52123456789/234682019-02-11 10:11:15.122oai:locus.ufv.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.locus.ufv.br/oai/requestfabiojreis@ufv.bropendoar:21452019-02-11T13:11:15LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)false
dc.title.en.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
title Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.
Cyanobacteria
Preservation methods
Lyophilization
Cryopreservation
Cyanobacterial collections
title_short Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
title_full Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
title_sort Comparative evaluation of different preservation methods for cyanobacterial strains
author Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.
author_facet Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.
Corrêa, Débora M.
Carneiro, Antônio P. S.
Rosa, Rinamara M.
Loterio, Robson
Araújo, Wagner L.
author_role author
author2 Corrêa, Débora M.
Carneiro, Antônio P. S.
Rosa, Rinamara M.
Loterio, Robson
Araújo, Wagner L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Esteves-Ferreira, Alberto A.
Corrêa, Débora M.
Carneiro, Antônio P. S.
Rosa, Rinamara M.
Loterio, Robson
Araújo, Wagner L.
dc.subject.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Cyanobacteria
Preservation methods
Lyophilization
Cryopreservation
Cyanobacterial collections
topic Cyanobacteria
Preservation methods
Lyophilization
Cryopreservation
Cyanobacterial collections
description Maintaining pure cultures using preservation methods is of high importance for biotechnological purposes. However, preservation does not necessarily guarantee the genetic stability of these cultures. Therefore, preservation methods are currently needed to assure viability as well as genetic, physiological, and morphological integrity across storage periods. In this study, preservation of five isolates from the microalgae and cyanobacteria collection of the Plant Biology Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil was investigated via monthly analyses of cell viability, biomass recovery, and contaminant concentrations over a period of 120 days. Lyophilization was adequate for both heterocystous cyanobacteria and other strains that were able to differentiate hormogones or to synthesize thick layers of exopolysaccharides. Lyophilization was also able to maintain cultures with low levels of contaminants. Dimethyl sulfoxide was relatively efficient, though some of the strains were susceptible to its cytotoxic effects. Our results demonstrated that cryopreservation with glycerol was the most efficient method. The ability to routinely preserve cyanobacterial strains reduces costs associated with maintaining large culture collections and reduces the risks of losing particular strains or species through contamination and genetic drift. The results obtained in this study are therefore discussed in the context of the efficiency of the methods and the current need to develop suitable methods for maintenance of cyanobacterial collections.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013-08
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-02-11T12:44:28Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2019-02-11T12:44:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 1573-5176
identifier_str_mv 1573-5176
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9927-9
http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/23468
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartofseries.pt-BR.fl_str_mv Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 919– 929, August 2013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Phycology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Phycology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
instname:Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron:UFV
instname_str Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
instacron_str UFV
institution UFV
reponame_str LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
collection LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23468/1/artigo.pdf
https://locus.ufv.br//bitstream/123456789/23468/2/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 9157f40c8b8b2f66f274a8dbbfbda69f
8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv LOCUS Repositório Institucional da UFV - Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv fabiojreis@ufv.br
_version_ 1794528226813411328