Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Cláudia Helena Lovato da
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Paranhos, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of applied oral science (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3417
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: This report evaluated the efficacy of three brushes and one biofilm disclosing agent in complete denture cleansing. METHODS: Twenty-seven wearers of maxillary dentures were distributed into three groups and received different brushes: Oral B40, conventional toothbrush (Oral B); Denture, denture-specific brush (Condor); Johnson & Johnson, denture-specific brush (Johnson & Johnson). The 60-day experimental period was divided into two techniques: I - brushing (brush associated with a paste - Dentu Creme, Dentco) three times a day; II - brushing and daily application of 1% neutral red on the denture internal surface. Biofilm quantification was carried out weekly and the areas with dye biofilm were obtained by means of Image Tool 2.02 software. RESULTS: Biofilm removal was more effective during Technique II (Wilcoxon test: p=0.01) for the three groups of brushes. When the brushes were compared in Technique I, the Kruskal Wallis test indicated statistical difference between Denture X Johnson & Johnson and Denture X Oral B40, in which the Denture was more efficient. For Technique II, there was no statistical difference between brushes (p>;0.05). CONCLUSION: The disclosed application promoted more efficacy on biofilm removal, regardless of the brush used. Denture (Condor) was more efficient than the other brushes during Technique I.
id USP-17_a1ceb84a351dd13356f8809a02c06efa
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/3417
network_acronym_str USP-17
network_name_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing Eficácia de um evidenciador de biofilme e de três escovas no controle da higiene de próteses totais Prótese totalBiofilmeHigienizadoresEvidenciadoresEscovasComplete dentureBiofilmCleansersDisclosing agentBrushes OBJECTIVE: This report evaluated the efficacy of three brushes and one biofilm disclosing agent in complete denture cleansing. METHODS: Twenty-seven wearers of maxillary dentures were distributed into three groups and received different brushes: Oral B40, conventional toothbrush (Oral B); Denture, denture-specific brush (Condor); Johnson & Johnson, denture-specific brush (Johnson & Johnson). The 60-day experimental period was divided into two techniques: I - brushing (brush associated with a paste - Dentu Creme, Dentco) three times a day; II - brushing and daily application of 1% neutral red on the denture internal surface. Biofilm quantification was carried out weekly and the areas with dye biofilm were obtained by means of Image Tool 2.02 software. RESULTS: Biofilm removal was more effective during Technique II (Wilcoxon test: p=0.01) for the three groups of brushes. When the brushes were compared in Technique I, the Kruskal Wallis test indicated statistical difference between Denture X Johnson & Johnson and Denture X Oral B40, in which the Denture was more efficient. For Technique II, there was no statistical difference between brushes (p>;0.05). CONCLUSION: The disclosed application promoted more efficacy on biofilm removal, regardless of the brush used. Denture (Condor) was more efficient than the other brushes during Technique I. Este trabalho avaliou três escovas e um evidenciador de biofilme na higiene de próteses totais. Vinte e sete usuários de próteses totais superiores foram distribuídos em três grupos que receberam diferentes escovas: Oral B40 para dentes naturais (Oral B); Denture para dentadura (Condor) e Johnson & Johnson para dentadura (Johnson & Johnson). O período experimental de 60 dias foi dividido em 2 Técnicas: I - utilização das escovas associadas a um dentifrício (Dentu-Creme, Dentco) três vezes ao dia; II - escovação e aplicação diária do evidenciador Vermelho neutro a 1% na superfície interna da prótese total. A quantificação do biofilme foi realizada semanalmente e as áreas com biofilme corado foram medidas com o auxílio do software Image Tool 2.02. A remoção do biofilme foi mais efetiva durante a Técnica II (teste de Wilcoxon: p=0.01) nos três grupos. Comparando as escovas, na Técnica I o teste de Kruskal Wallis indicou diferença significante (p=0.05) entre Denture X Johnson & Johnson e Denture X OralB 40, sendo a Denture a mais eficaz. Na Técnica II, as escovas não apresentaram diferença estatisticamente significante (p>;0,05). A aplicação do evidenciador promoveu maior eficácia na remoção do biofilme, independentemente da escova utilizada. Na comparação das escovas na Técnica I, a escova Denture foi a mais eficiente. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2006-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/341710.1590/S1678-77572006000600012Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 6 (2006); 454-459 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 6 (2006); 454-459 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 6 (2006); 454-459 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3417/4107Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Cláudia Helena Lovato daParanhos, Helena de Freitas Oliveira2012-04-27T11:55:50Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/3417Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2012-04-27T11:55:50Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
Eficácia de um evidenciador de biofilme e de três escovas no controle da higiene de próteses totais
title Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
spellingShingle Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
Silva, Cláudia Helena Lovato da
Prótese total
Biofilme
Higienizadores
Evidenciadores
Escovas
Complete denture
Biofilm
Cleansers
Disclosing agent
Brushes
title_short Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
title_full Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
title_fullStr Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
title_sort Efficacy of biofilm disclosing agent and of three brushes in the control of complete denture cleansing
author Silva, Cláudia Helena Lovato da
author_facet Silva, Cláudia Helena Lovato da
Paranhos, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Paranhos, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Cláudia Helena Lovato da
Paranhos, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Prótese total
Biofilme
Higienizadores
Evidenciadores
Escovas
Complete denture
Biofilm
Cleansers
Disclosing agent
Brushes
topic Prótese total
Biofilme
Higienizadores
Evidenciadores
Escovas
Complete denture
Biofilm
Cleansers
Disclosing agent
Brushes
description OBJECTIVE: This report evaluated the efficacy of three brushes and one biofilm disclosing agent in complete denture cleansing. METHODS: Twenty-seven wearers of maxillary dentures were distributed into three groups and received different brushes: Oral B40, conventional toothbrush (Oral B); Denture, denture-specific brush (Condor); Johnson & Johnson, denture-specific brush (Johnson & Johnson). The 60-day experimental period was divided into two techniques: I - brushing (brush associated with a paste - Dentu Creme, Dentco) three times a day; II - brushing and daily application of 1% neutral red on the denture internal surface. Biofilm quantification was carried out weekly and the areas with dye biofilm were obtained by means of Image Tool 2.02 software. RESULTS: Biofilm removal was more effective during Technique II (Wilcoxon test: p=0.01) for the three groups of brushes. When the brushes were compared in Technique I, the Kruskal Wallis test indicated statistical difference between Denture X Johnson & Johnson and Denture X Oral B40, in which the Denture was more efficient. For Technique II, there was no statistical difference between brushes (p>;0.05). CONCLUSION: The disclosed application promoted more efficacy on biofilm removal, regardless of the brush used. Denture (Condor) was more efficient than the other brushes during Technique I.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3417
10.1590/S1678-77572006000600012
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3417
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-77572006000600012
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/3417/4107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2006 Journal of Applied Oral Science
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 No. 6 (2006); 454-459
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 14 Núm. 6 (2006); 454-459
Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 14 n. 6 (2006); 454-459
1678-7765
1678-7757
reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Journal of applied oral science (Online)
collection Journal of applied oral science (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||jaos@usp.br
_version_ 1787713190141886464