Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Buccini, Gabriela dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Benício, Maria Helena D'Aquino, Venancio, Sonia Isoyama
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705
Resumo: OBJECTIVE To analyze the factors associated with the use of pacifiers and/or bottle feeding in infants aged under one year. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study with 34,366 children and using data from the database of the 2nd Nationwide Survey of Breastfeeding Prevalence performed in the Brazilian capitals and Federal District in 2008. Cluster sampling was used. The questionnaire included questions about the use of artificial nipples in the last 24 hours. The analysis considered three outcomes: exclusive use of pacifier, exclusive use of bottle feeding, and use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding). Prevalence ratios were obtained using Poisson regression with robust variance following a hierarchical model. RESULTS The following factors were associated with exclusive use of the pacifier: mother working outside the home, primiparity, child was not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with exclusive use of bottle feeding: mother working outside the home, primiparity, low birth weight, child not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed milk formula and tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding): mother working outside the home, primiparity, cesarean delivery, the male gender, low birth weight, born in a hospital not accredited as “baby friendly”, required health baby monitoring in the Primary Health Care Unit (PR = 0.91), and child had consumed milk formula, water, or tea on the first day at home. CONCLUSIONS This study identified profiles of exclusive users of pacifiers, bottle feeding, and both. The provided information can guide preventive practices for child health.
id USP-23_97b939da1a55f9904bae2d0c6e8a2f1b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/85705
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding Determinantes do uso de chupeta e mamadeira OBJECTIVE To analyze the factors associated with the use of pacifiers and/or bottle feeding in infants aged under one year. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study with 34,366 children and using data from the database of the 2nd Nationwide Survey of Breastfeeding Prevalence performed in the Brazilian capitals and Federal District in 2008. Cluster sampling was used. The questionnaire included questions about the use of artificial nipples in the last 24 hours. The analysis considered three outcomes: exclusive use of pacifier, exclusive use of bottle feeding, and use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding). Prevalence ratios were obtained using Poisson regression with robust variance following a hierarchical model. RESULTS The following factors were associated with exclusive use of the pacifier: mother working outside the home, primiparity, child was not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with exclusive use of bottle feeding: mother working outside the home, primiparity, low birth weight, child not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed milk formula and tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding): mother working outside the home, primiparity, cesarean delivery, the male gender, low birth weight, born in a hospital not accredited as “baby friendly”, required health baby monitoring in the Primary Health Care Unit (PR = 0.91), and child had consumed milk formula, water, or tea on the first day at home. CONCLUSIONS This study identified profiles of exclusive users of pacifiers, bottle feeding, and both. The provided information can guide preventive practices for child health. OBJETIVO Analisar os fatores associados ao uso de chupeta e/ou mamadeira em lactentes menores de um ano. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal realizado com dados de 34.366 crianças obtidos da II Pesquisa Nacional de Prevalência de Aleitamento Materno, realizada em 2008, nas capitais brasileiras e Distrito Federal. Foi utilizada amostragem por conglomerados e o questionário incluiu perguntas sobre o uso de bicos artificiais nas últimas 24h. Três desfechos foram considerados para a análise: uso exclusivo de chupeta, uso exclusivo de mamadeira e uso de bicos artificiais (chupeta e mamadeira). As razões de prevalência foram obtidas por regressão de Poisson com variância robusta seguindo modelo hierárquico. RESULTADOS Associaram-se ao uso exclusivo de chupeta: mãe trabalhar fora, primiparidade, não ter sido amamentado na primeira hora e uso do chá no primeiro dia em casa. Para uso exclusivo da mamadeira, foram identificados: mãe trabalhar fora, primiparidade, baixo peso ao nascer, não amamentado na primeira hora de vida, uso de fórmula e chá no primeiro dia em casa. O uso de bicos artificiais (chupeta e mamadeira) foi associado com trabalho materno fora do lar, primiparidade, parto cesárea, bebês do sexo masculino, baixo peso ao nascer, nascimento em um hospital não credenciado como “Amigo da Criança”, realizar o acompanhamento de saúde da criança em unidade básica de saúde (RP = 0,91), uso de fórmula, água e chá no primeiro dia em casa. CONCLUSÕES Este estudo encontrou perfis de usuários exclusivos de chupetas, mamadeiras e de ambos. Essas informações podem orientar as práticas preventivas para a saúde da criança. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2014-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/8570510.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005128Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 4 (2014); 571-582Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 4 (2014); 571-582Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 4 (2014); 571-5821518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPengporhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705/88466https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705/88467Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBuccini, Gabriela dos Santos Benício, Maria Helena D'Aquino Venancio, Sonia Isoyama 2014-10-17T20:03:34Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/85705Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-10-17T20:03:34Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
Determinantes do uso de chupeta e mamadeira
title Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
spellingShingle Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
Buccini, Gabriela dos Santos
title_short Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
title_full Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
title_fullStr Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
title_sort Determinants of using pacifier and bottle feeding
author Buccini, Gabriela dos Santos
author_facet Buccini, Gabriela dos Santos
Benício, Maria Helena D'Aquino
Venancio, Sonia Isoyama
author_role author
author2 Benício, Maria Helena D'Aquino
Venancio, Sonia Isoyama
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Buccini, Gabriela dos Santos
Benício, Maria Helena D'Aquino
Venancio, Sonia Isoyama
description OBJECTIVE To analyze the factors associated with the use of pacifiers and/or bottle feeding in infants aged under one year. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study with 34,366 children and using data from the database of the 2nd Nationwide Survey of Breastfeeding Prevalence performed in the Brazilian capitals and Federal District in 2008. Cluster sampling was used. The questionnaire included questions about the use of artificial nipples in the last 24 hours. The analysis considered three outcomes: exclusive use of pacifier, exclusive use of bottle feeding, and use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding). Prevalence ratios were obtained using Poisson regression with robust variance following a hierarchical model. RESULTS The following factors were associated with exclusive use of the pacifier: mother working outside the home, primiparity, child was not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with exclusive use of bottle feeding: mother working outside the home, primiparity, low birth weight, child not breastfed within the first hour, and child had consumed milk formula and tea on the first day at home. The following factors were associated with use of artificial nipples (pacifier and bottle feeding): mother working outside the home, primiparity, cesarean delivery, the male gender, low birth weight, born in a hospital not accredited as “baby friendly”, required health baby monitoring in the Primary Health Care Unit (PR = 0.91), and child had consumed milk formula, water, or tea on the first day at home. CONCLUSIONS This study identified profiles of exclusive users of pacifiers, bottle feeding, and both. The provided information can guide preventive practices for child health.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005128
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005128
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705/88466
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/85705/88467
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 4 (2014); 571-582
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 4 (2014); 571-582
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 4 (2014); 571-582
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1787713235701465088