Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silvestre,Hugo Consciência
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Catarino,João Ricardo, Araújo,Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072016000400355
Resumo: Abstract Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why? In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.
id USP-27_6bf58aeda66ed1878be9ebc4d10a24e5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0080-21072016000400355
network_acronym_str USP-27
network_name_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in PortugalCo-productionPublic servicesEfficiencyEffectivenessPortugalAbstract Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why? In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072016000400355Revista de Administração (São Paulo) v.51 n.4 2016reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilvestre,Hugo ConsciênciaCatarino,João RicardoAraújo,Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves deeng2016-10-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0080-21072016000400355Revistahttp://rausp.usp.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br1984-61420080-2107opendoar:2016-10-10T00:00Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
title Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
spellingShingle Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
Silvestre,Hugo Consciência
Co-production
Public services
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Portugal
title_short Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
title_full Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
title_fullStr Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
title_full_unstemmed Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
title_sort Evidence of co-production in public service provision: the case of the administrative arbitration centre in Portugal
author Silvestre,Hugo Consciência
author_facet Silvestre,Hugo Consciência
Catarino,João Ricardo
Araújo,Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de
author_role author
author2 Catarino,João Ricardo
Araújo,Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silvestre,Hugo Consciência
Catarino,João Ricardo
Araújo,Joaquim Filipe Ferraz Esteves de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Co-production
Public services
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Portugal
topic Co-production
Public services
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Portugal
description Abstract Co-production includes all actions where citizens assist, as volunteers, in the provision of services by public agencies in order to increase the efficiency and efficacy of the public services provided. This practice, known as co-production, is being adopted by governments in the resolution of conflicts, particularly those regarding administrative and fiscal matters. However, is co-production a more efficient and effective way of settling disputes in administrative and tax areas than the traditional administrative model? And why? In Portugal, the Administrative Arbitration Centre was created in 2009 with the aim of resolving disputes between public administration and taxpayers/service users by means of co-production. The available data support the thesis that efficiency and efficacy are higher under the co-production model. Nevertheless, users are not totally satisfied since the costs associated with the use of this service provision model are also higher.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072016000400355
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-21072016000400355
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.rausp.2016.07.007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Administração da Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração (São Paulo) v.51 n.4 2016
reponame:Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
collection Revista de Administração (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Administração (São Paulo) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rausp@usp.br||reinhard@usp.br
_version_ 1748936717233029120