Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/12510 |
Resumo: | The use of repellents as a form of individual protection is stimulated to reduce the number of interactions between hosts and vectors and consequently the spread of pathogens. This study evaluated the efficacy of different commercially used repellents against Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Methodology: Three commercial repellent formulations containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as active principle were evaluated. The test consisted of the application of 4mg of the product on the hands of volunteers and the introduction of hands in cages containing 20 female mosquitoes each. The sting attempts were counted for 10 minutes in all tests, and the repellents were evaluated 30 minutes, 2 hours and 5 hours after application. Results: The performance of the three formulations of repellents was similar in Aedes albopictus, reaching> 98% in the repellency indexes at all times. In the tests carried out with Aedes aegypti, the DEET content presented a low performance, reaching 42% in the 5 hour test repellency index, followed by repellents containing IR3535 and Icaridina, which obtained 66% and 77.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The formulation containing Icaridina obtained 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes albopictus, while no formulation offered 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes aegypti, during the times specified in the labels. Therefore, tested repellents containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as an active principle offer the potential to reduce bites and not necessarily to provide full protection, allowing consumers to use unprotected insect repellents from several arboviruses. |
id |
Ânima_447adc54169702d6c39541a7b43150ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/12510 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegyptiEvaluation of the effectiveness of different commercial repellents against Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegyptiRepelentesAedes aegyptiAedes albopictusThe use of repellents as a form of individual protection is stimulated to reduce the number of interactions between hosts and vectors and consequently the spread of pathogens. This study evaluated the efficacy of different commercially used repellents against Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Methodology: Three commercial repellent formulations containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as active principle were evaluated. The test consisted of the application of 4mg of the product on the hands of volunteers and the introduction of hands in cages containing 20 female mosquitoes each. The sting attempts were counted for 10 minutes in all tests, and the repellents were evaluated 30 minutes, 2 hours and 5 hours after application. Results: The performance of the three formulations of repellents was similar in Aedes albopictus, reaching> 98% in the repellency indexes at all times. In the tests carried out with Aedes aegypti, the DEET content presented a low performance, reaching 42% in the 5 hour test repellency index, followed by repellents containing IR3535 and Icaridina, which obtained 66% and 77.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The formulation containing Icaridina obtained 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes albopictus, while no formulation offered 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes aegypti, during the times specified in the labels. Therefore, tested repellents containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as an active principle offer the potential to reduce bites and not necessarily to provide full protection, allowing consumers to use unprotected insect repellents from several arboviruses.A utilização de repelentes como forma de proteção individual é estimulada para reduzir o número de interações entre hospedeiros e vetores e consequentemente a disseminação de patógenos. Neste estudo foi avaliado a eficácia de diferentes repelentes utilizados comercialmente contra mosquitos Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti. Metodologia: Foram avaliadas três formulações repelentes comerciais contendo DEET, Icaridina e IR3535 como princípio ativo. O teste consistiu na aplicação de 4mg do produto sobre as mãos de voluntários e na introdução das mãos em gaiolas contendo 20 mosquitos fêmeas cada. As tentativas de picadas foram contabilizadas durante 10 minutos em todos os testes, e os repelentes foram avaliados 30 minutos, 2 horas e 5 horas após a aplicação. Resultados: O desempenho das três formulações de repelentes foi semelhante em Aedes albopictus, atingindo >98% nos índices de repelência em todos os tempos. Nos testes realizados com Aedes aegypti, o produto contento DEET apresentou um baixo desempenho, chegando a 42% no índice de repelência no tempo de 5 horas dos testes, seguido pelos repelentes contendo IR3535 e Icaridina que obtiveram 66% e 77,5% respectivamente. Conclusões: A formulação contendo Icaridina obteve 100% no índice de repelência contra Aedes albopictus, enquanto nenhuma formulação ofereceu 100% no índice de repelência contra Aedes aegypti, durante os tempos especificados nos rótulos. Portanto, os repelentes testados contendo DEET, Icaridina e IR3535 como princípio ativo, oferecem um potencial de reduzir as picadas e não necessariamente em prover proteção total podendo deixar os consumidores que utilizam repelentes desprotegidos de diversas arboviroses.Prophiro, Josiane SomarivaCosta, Felipe Allan da Silva2019-08-16T00:31:00Z2020-12-09T17:19:04Z2019-08-16T00:31:00Z2020-12-09T17:19:04Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis65 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/12510Ciências Biológicas Licenciatura - TubarãoTubarãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-11T06:10:21Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/12510Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-11T06:10:21Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti Evaluation of the effectiveness of different commercial repellents against Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti |
title |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
spellingShingle |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti Costa, Felipe Allan da Silva Repelentes Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus |
title_short |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
title_full |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
title_fullStr |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
title_full_unstemmed |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
title_sort |
Avaliação da eficácia de diferentes repelentes comerciais contra Aedes albopictus e Aedes aegypti |
author |
Costa, Felipe Allan da Silva |
author_facet |
Costa, Felipe Allan da Silva |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Prophiro, Josiane Somariva |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Felipe Allan da Silva |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Repelentes Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus |
topic |
Repelentes Aedes aegypti Aedes albopictus |
description |
The use of repellents as a form of individual protection is stimulated to reduce the number of interactions between hosts and vectors and consequently the spread of pathogens. This study evaluated the efficacy of different commercially used repellents against Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. Methodology: Three commercial repellent formulations containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as active principle were evaluated. The test consisted of the application of 4mg of the product on the hands of volunteers and the introduction of hands in cages containing 20 female mosquitoes each. The sting attempts were counted for 10 minutes in all tests, and the repellents were evaluated 30 minutes, 2 hours and 5 hours after application. Results: The performance of the three formulations of repellents was similar in Aedes albopictus, reaching> 98% in the repellency indexes at all times. In the tests carried out with Aedes aegypti, the DEET content presented a low performance, reaching 42% in the 5 hour test repellency index, followed by repellents containing IR3535 and Icaridina, which obtained 66% and 77.5%, respectively. Conclusions: The formulation containing Icaridina obtained 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes albopictus, while no formulation offered 100% in the index of repellency against Aedes aegypti, during the times specified in the labels. Therefore, tested repellents containing DEET, Icaridina and IR3535 as an active principle offer the potential to reduce bites and not necessarily to provide full protection, allowing consumers to use unprotected insect repellents from several arboviruses. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-08-16T00:31:00Z 2019-08-16T00:31:00Z 2019 2020-12-09T17:19:04Z 2020-12-09T17:19:04Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/12510 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/12510 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciências Biológicas Licenciatura - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
65 f. application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415834597130240 |