Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000500174 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objectives: to measure the average time spent by the nursing staff during patient admission and investigate their compliance with the activities described by the Nursing Interventions Classification; evaluate the degree of interference in the workload of the team. Methods: observational with time measurement through software. We followed 199 admissions made by the nursing staff in seven units, using two validated instruments. Total scores ≥ 70% and 50% validated the process. Results: the average time of nurses ranged from 5.5 (standard deviation = 2.3) to 13 (standard deviation = 1.1) minutes; and the auxiliary / technician, between 4.7 (standard deviation = 2.1) and 6.8 (standard deviation = 2.0) minutes (p ≤ 0.01). We qualified six admissions made by nurses and 33 by assistants/technicians. The intervention spent 16.3% to 31.5% of the working hours of the team. Conclusions: admission impacts nursing workload and needs to be considered both in the measurement of activities and in the sizing of the nursing staff. |
id |
ABEN-1_703ae526a0bf4912d21ef2710a1b273f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-71672020000500174 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEN-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workloadWorkloadProcess Assessment, Health CareTime ManagementWorkflowNursing Human ResourcesABSTRACT Objectives: to measure the average time spent by the nursing staff during patient admission and investigate their compliance with the activities described by the Nursing Interventions Classification; evaluate the degree of interference in the workload of the team. Methods: observational with time measurement through software. We followed 199 admissions made by the nursing staff in seven units, using two validated instruments. Total scores ≥ 70% and 50% validated the process. Results: the average time of nurses ranged from 5.5 (standard deviation = 2.3) to 13 (standard deviation = 1.1) minutes; and the auxiliary / technician, between 4.7 (standard deviation = 2.1) and 6.8 (standard deviation = 2.0) minutes (p ≤ 0.01). We qualified six admissions made by nurses and 33 by assistants/technicians. The intervention spent 16.3% to 31.5% of the working hours of the team. Conclusions: admission impacts nursing workload and needs to be considered both in the measurement of activities and in the sizing of the nursing staff.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000500174Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.5 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0267info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTrovó,Simone AparecidaCucolo,Danielle FabianaPerroca,Marcia Galaneng2020-07-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672020000500174Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2020-07-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
title |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
spellingShingle |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload Trovó,Simone Aparecida Workload Process Assessment, Health Care Time Management Workflow Nursing Human Resources |
title_short |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
title_full |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
title_fullStr |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
title_full_unstemmed |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
title_sort |
Time and quality of admissions: nursing workload |
author |
Trovó,Simone Aparecida |
author_facet |
Trovó,Simone Aparecida Cucolo,Danielle Fabiana Perroca,Marcia Galan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cucolo,Danielle Fabiana Perroca,Marcia Galan |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trovó,Simone Aparecida Cucolo,Danielle Fabiana Perroca,Marcia Galan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Workload Process Assessment, Health Care Time Management Workflow Nursing Human Resources |
topic |
Workload Process Assessment, Health Care Time Management Workflow Nursing Human Resources |
description |
ABSTRACT Objectives: to measure the average time spent by the nursing staff during patient admission and investigate their compliance with the activities described by the Nursing Interventions Classification; evaluate the degree of interference in the workload of the team. Methods: observational with time measurement through software. We followed 199 admissions made by the nursing staff in seven units, using two validated instruments. Total scores ≥ 70% and 50% validated the process. Results: the average time of nurses ranged from 5.5 (standard deviation = 2.3) to 13 (standard deviation = 1.1) minutes; and the auxiliary / technician, between 4.7 (standard deviation = 2.1) and 6.8 (standard deviation = 2.0) minutes (p ≤ 0.01). We qualified six admissions made by nurses and 33 by assistants/technicians. The intervention spent 16.3% to 31.5% of the working hours of the team. Conclusions: admission impacts nursing workload and needs to be considered both in the measurement of activities and in the sizing of the nursing staff. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000500174 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672020000500174 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0267 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.73 n.5 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) instacron:ABEN |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
instacron_str |
ABEN |
institution |
ABEN |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br |
_version_ |
1754303037849993216 |