Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABENO (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/144 |
Resumo: | This study explored dental students’ performance (quantitative data) and perceptions (qualitative data) on canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary vs. hand instruments and discussed interactions between technical findings and students’ insights. A mixed methods design was used. Each student (n=20) instrumented two canals using hand K-files and two canals using ProTaper Universal® rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Participants had no previous experience with rotary instrumentation but were familiar with hand instrumentation. Quantitative data: apical transportation, working time for instrumentation and procedural errors were statistically analyzed. Qualitative data (students’ perceptions) were collected and perceptions were identified from interview contents using thematic analysis. Lower level of apical transportation, fewer procedural errors (ledge/perforation/blockage), and a longer working time were associated with rotary instrumentation. Working time was shorter in the second canal instrumented with both techniques. Perceptions associated with hand instrumentation were: better domain and practice/confidence due to the students being used to the hand technique. Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation perceptions were: good initial expectations before its use, perceptions of doubts and difficulties concerning workability right after its first use, and increase in confidence after its second use in a second canal. It was concluded that: (i) students show a cautious attitude towards rotary instrumentation; (ii) confidence increases after rotary instrumentation of the second canal; (iii) students show good expectations in terms of optimizing root canal treatment with rotary instrumentation and they think it would be possible after some training; and (iv) Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation should be included in the undergraduate curriculum of dental schools. |
id |
ABENO-2_ea6d9304f8cb42c7bc3f628e770f93bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/144 |
network_acronym_str |
ABENO-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods studyPerformance e percepções de estudantes de odontologia no preparo de canais: um estudo de métodos mistosDental education. Students’ perception. Mixed methods research. Endodontics. Root canal shaping.Ensino odontológico. Percepção de estudantes. Métodos mistos de pesquisa. Endodontia. Pre-paro do canal radicular.This study explored dental students’ performance (quantitative data) and perceptions (qualitative data) on canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary vs. hand instruments and discussed interactions between technical findings and students’ insights. A mixed methods design was used. Each student (n=20) instrumented two canals using hand K-files and two canals using ProTaper Universal® rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Participants had no previous experience with rotary instrumentation but were familiar with hand instrumentation. Quantitative data: apical transportation, working time for instrumentation and procedural errors were statistically analyzed. Qualitative data (students’ perceptions) were collected and perceptions were identified from interview contents using thematic analysis. Lower level of apical transportation, fewer procedural errors (ledge/perforation/blockage), and a longer working time were associated with rotary instrumentation. Working time was shorter in the second canal instrumented with both techniques. Perceptions associated with hand instrumentation were: better domain and practice/confidence due to the students being used to the hand technique. Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation perceptions were: good initial expectations before its use, perceptions of doubts and difficulties concerning workability right after its first use, and increase in confidence after its second use in a second canal. It was concluded that: (i) students show a cautious attitude towards rotary instrumentation; (ii) confidence increases after rotary instrumentation of the second canal; (iii) students show good expectations in terms of optimizing root canal treatment with rotary instrumentation and they think it would be possible after some training; and (iv) Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation should be included in the undergraduate curriculum of dental schools.Este estudo explorou o desempenho dos estudantes de odontologia (dados quantitativos) e percepções (dados qualitativos) em relação ao preparo do canal com instrumentos rotatórios de Ni-Ti versus instrumentos manuais e discutiu interações entre os achados técnicos e os insights dos estudantes. O delineamento usado foi o de métodos mistos. Cada estudante (n=20) instrumentou dois canais usando instrumentos manuais e dois canais usando instrumentos rotatórios de Ni-Ti (ProTaper Universal®). Os participantes não tinham experiência com instrumentação rotatória, mas estavam familiarizados com instrumentação manual. Dados quantitativos, tais como transporte apical, tempo de trabalho para a instrumentação e erros de procedimento foram estatisticamente analisados. Dados qualitativos (percepções dos estudantes) foram coletados, sendo que as percepções foram identificadas a partir do conteúdo das entrevistas utilizando a análise temática. Baixos valores de transporte apical, poucos erros de procedimento (desvio/perfuração/bloqueio), e tempo de trabalho mais longo foram associados à instrumentação rotatória. O tempo de trabalho foi mais curto no segundo canal instrumentado por ambas as técnicas. Percepções associadas com instrumentação manual foram: melhor domínio e prática/segurança em virtude de os estudantes estarem acostumados com a técnica. Percepções para a instrumentação rotatória: boas expectativas iniciais, antes de utilizar; percepção de dúvidas e dificuldades em relação ao manejo do instrumento logo antes de utilizar; e, aumento da segurança na utilização depois do segundo uso, no segundo canal. A combinação dos achados quantitativos e qualitativos levou às seguintes conclusões: (i) os estudantes mostraram uma atitude de precaução frente à instrumentação rotatória de Ni-Ti; (ii) a segurança amentou depois da instrumentação do segundo canal; (iii) os estudantes mostraram expectativas boas em termos da otimização do tratamento de canal radicular com a instrumentação rotatória e pensam que isso será possível após algum treinamento; e (iv) a instrumentação rotatória com Ni-Ti deveria ser incluído no currículo de graduação das escolas de odontologia.Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico2015-06-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/14410.30979/rev.abeno.v15i1.144Revista da ABENO; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2015); 97-109Revista da ABENO; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2015); 97-109Revista da ABENO; v. 15 n. 1 (2015); 97-1092595-02741679-5954reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)instacron:ABENOporhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/144/140Copyright (c) 2015 Revista da ABENOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSalles, Alexandre AzevedoGrazziotin-Soares, RenataArdenghi, Diego MachadoDal-Farra, Rossano AndréBarletta, Fernando Branco2015-06-29T22:19:33Zoai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/144Revistahttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/indexONGhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/oairevabeno@gmail.com2595-02741679-5954opendoar:2023-01-13T09:47:52.806092Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study Performance e percepções de estudantes de odontologia no preparo de canais: um estudo de métodos mistos |
title |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
spellingShingle |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study Salles, Alexandre Azevedo Dental education. Students’ perception. Mixed methods research. Endodontics. Root canal shaping. Ensino odontológico. Percepção de estudantes. Métodos mistos de pesquisa. Endodontia. Pre-paro do canal radicular. |
title_short |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
title_full |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
title_sort |
Dental students’ performance and perceptions on canal preparation: a mixed methods study |
author |
Salles, Alexandre Azevedo |
author_facet |
Salles, Alexandre Azevedo Grazziotin-Soares, Renata Ardenghi, Diego Machado Dal-Farra, Rossano André Barletta, Fernando Branco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grazziotin-Soares, Renata Ardenghi, Diego Machado Dal-Farra, Rossano André Barletta, Fernando Branco |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Salles, Alexandre Azevedo Grazziotin-Soares, Renata Ardenghi, Diego Machado Dal-Farra, Rossano André Barletta, Fernando Branco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental education. Students’ perception. Mixed methods research. Endodontics. Root canal shaping. Ensino odontológico. Percepção de estudantes. Métodos mistos de pesquisa. Endodontia. Pre-paro do canal radicular. |
topic |
Dental education. Students’ perception. Mixed methods research. Endodontics. Root canal shaping. Ensino odontológico. Percepção de estudantes. Métodos mistos de pesquisa. Endodontia. Pre-paro do canal radicular. |
description |
This study explored dental students’ performance (quantitative data) and perceptions (qualitative data) on canal preparation with Ni-Ti rotary vs. hand instruments and discussed interactions between technical findings and students’ insights. A mixed methods design was used. Each student (n=20) instrumented two canals using hand K-files and two canals using ProTaper Universal® rotary Ni-Ti instruments. Participants had no previous experience with rotary instrumentation but were familiar with hand instrumentation. Quantitative data: apical transportation, working time for instrumentation and procedural errors were statistically analyzed. Qualitative data (students’ perceptions) were collected and perceptions were identified from interview contents using thematic analysis. Lower level of apical transportation, fewer procedural errors (ledge/perforation/blockage), and a longer working time were associated with rotary instrumentation. Working time was shorter in the second canal instrumented with both techniques. Perceptions associated with hand instrumentation were: better domain and practice/confidence due to the students being used to the hand technique. Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation perceptions were: good initial expectations before its use, perceptions of doubts and difficulties concerning workability right after its first use, and increase in confidence after its second use in a second canal. It was concluded that: (i) students show a cautious attitude towards rotary instrumentation; (ii) confidence increases after rotary instrumentation of the second canal; (iii) students show good expectations in terms of optimizing root canal treatment with rotary instrumentation and they think it would be possible after some training; and (iv) Ni-Ti rotary instrumentation should be included in the undergraduate curriculum of dental schools. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/144 10.30979/rev.abeno.v15i1.144 |
url |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/144 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30979/rev.abeno.v15i1.144 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/144/140 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista da ABENO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista da ABENO |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABENO; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2015); 97-109 Revista da ABENO; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2015); 97-109 Revista da ABENO; v. 15 n. 1 (2015); 97-109 2595-0274 1679-5954 reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) instacron:ABENO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) |
instacron_str |
ABENO |
institution |
ABENO |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revabeno@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051145631301632 |