MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000100083 |
Resumo: | Abstract The goal of the present study was to conduct an ethnobotanical survey on the knowledge and the use of medicinal plants by five rural communities located within the Tambaba Environmental Protection Area, State of Paraiba. Data were collected by semi structured interviewing 58 key-informants aged 28 and 83 years. A total of 71 medicinal species, from 47 families, was identified and Leguminosae being the most cited. The leaves were the most used parts and the tea was the most common mode of use. Use Value index reveals the group of nine species mostly used by the communities. The Informant Consensus Factor indicated respiratory system disorders as the most commonly treated. The ANOSIM-one way permutation test revealed that the communities are very similar when compared in relation to the species and their therapeutic uses. These communities used medicinal plants as an efficient and immediate alternative to treat various everyday diseases. |
id |
ANPPAS-1_b1abc75e70653825177f8eb352b035be |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1414-753X2017000100083 |
network_acronym_str |
ANPPAS-1 |
network_name_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZILEthnobotanyAtlantic forestConservation UnitTraditional knowledgeRural communityAbstract The goal of the present study was to conduct an ethnobotanical survey on the knowledge and the use of medicinal plants by five rural communities located within the Tambaba Environmental Protection Area, State of Paraiba. Data were collected by semi structured interviewing 58 key-informants aged 28 and 83 years. A total of 71 medicinal species, from 47 families, was identified and Leguminosae being the most cited. The leaves were the most used parts and the tea was the most common mode of use. Use Value index reveals the group of nine species mostly used by the communities. The Informant Consensus Factor indicated respiratory system disorders as the most commonly treated. The ANOSIM-one way permutation test revealed that the communities are very similar when compared in relation to the species and their therapeutic uses. These communities used medicinal plants as an efficient and immediate alternative to treat various everyday diseases.ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade2017-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000100083Ambiente & Sociedade v.20 n.1 2017reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:ANPPAS10.1590/1809-4422asoc20150034r2v2012017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBRITO,MICHELE FERNANDA MARQUES DEMARÍN,EDNA ARÉVALOCRUZ,DENISE DIAS DAeng2017-05-09T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1414-753X2017000100083Revistahttp://anpocs.com/index.php/revista-ambiente-e-sociedadehttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com1809-44221414-753Xopendoar:2017-05-09T00:00Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
title |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
spellingShingle |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL BRITO,MICHELE FERNANDA MARQUES DE Ethnobotany Atlantic forest Conservation Unit Traditional knowledge Rural community |
title_short |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
title_full |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
title_fullStr |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
title_full_unstemmed |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
title_sort |
MEDICINAL PLANTS IN RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF A PROTECTED AREA IN THE LITTORAL OF NORTHEAST BRAZIL |
author |
BRITO,MICHELE FERNANDA MARQUES DE |
author_facet |
BRITO,MICHELE FERNANDA MARQUES DE MARÍN,EDNA ARÉVALO CRUZ,DENISE DIAS DA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
MARÍN,EDNA ARÉVALO CRUZ,DENISE DIAS DA |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
BRITO,MICHELE FERNANDA MARQUES DE MARÍN,EDNA ARÉVALO CRUZ,DENISE DIAS DA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ethnobotany Atlantic forest Conservation Unit Traditional knowledge Rural community |
topic |
Ethnobotany Atlantic forest Conservation Unit Traditional knowledge Rural community |
description |
Abstract The goal of the present study was to conduct an ethnobotanical survey on the knowledge and the use of medicinal plants by five rural communities located within the Tambaba Environmental Protection Area, State of Paraiba. Data were collected by semi structured interviewing 58 key-informants aged 28 and 83 years. A total of 71 medicinal species, from 47 families, was identified and Leguminosae being the most cited. The leaves were the most used parts and the tea was the most common mode of use. Use Value index reveals the group of nine species mostly used by the communities. The Informant Consensus Factor indicated respiratory system disorders as the most commonly treated. The ANOSIM-one way permutation test revealed that the communities are very similar when compared in relation to the species and their therapeutic uses. These communities used medicinal plants as an efficient and immediate alternative to treat various everyday diseases. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000100083 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1414-753X2017000100083 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1809-4422asoc20150034r2v2012017 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ANPPAS - Revista Ambiente e Sociedade |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade v.20 n.1 2017 reponame:Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:ANPPAS |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
ANPPAS |
institution |
ANPPAS |
reponame_str |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Ambiente & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaambienteesociedade@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1754209166543552512 |