Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the use of these instruments on the experimental pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: We used a modified surgical simulator that uses a porcine heart-lung block filled with tomato sauce, and tested specific (Group 1) and regular (Group 2) instruments. Each group includes 15 experiments. Results: The median total time, excluding the time spent to correct the lesions, was 45.08 and 45.81 minutes, respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the total times (p=0.58). The only statistically different was seen for partial times regarding the elapsed time to cut and suture of lung fissures (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were more direct lesions and indirect leaks in Group 2, but without statistical significance (p=1.000 and p=0.203, respectively). The mean time spent for the diagnosis and correction of these events was 1.77 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.18 for Group 1 and 2.72 ± 1.11 minutes for Group 2 (p=0.044). Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive instruments is not associated with time improvement spent with experimental video-assisted lung lobectomy and does not lead to a faster or safer surgery. The use of VATS instruments makes correction of adverse events faster when they occur. |
id |
CBC-1_05ab36bca132b7b6599def49521e87d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100164 |
network_acronym_str |
CBC-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomyThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedSurgical InstrumentsPerformance TestsABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the use of these instruments on the experimental pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: We used a modified surgical simulator that uses a porcine heart-lung block filled with tomato sauce, and tested specific (Group 1) and regular (Group 2) instruments. Each group includes 15 experiments. Results: The median total time, excluding the time spent to correct the lesions, was 45.08 and 45.81 minutes, respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the total times (p=0.58). The only statistically different was seen for partial times regarding the elapsed time to cut and suture of lung fissures (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were more direct lesions and indirect leaks in Group 2, but without statistical significance (p=1.000 and p=0.203, respectively). The mean time spent for the diagnosis and correction of these events was 1.77 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.18 for Group 1 and 2.72 ± 1.11 minutes for Group 2 (p=0.044). Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive instruments is not associated with time improvement spent with experimental video-assisted lung lobectomy and does not lead to a faster or safer surgery. The use of VATS instruments makes correction of adverse events faster when they occur.Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiõesinstname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)instacron:CBC10.1590/0100-6991e-20202435info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOLIVEIRA,LEONARDO CESAR SILVACASTRO,JOSUE VIANAeng2020-05-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69912020000100164Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rcbcONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistacbc@cbc.org.br1809-45460100-6991opendoar:2020-05-26T00:00Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
spellingShingle |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO CESAR SILVA Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Surgical Instruments Performance Tests |
title_short |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_full |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_fullStr |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
title_sort |
Thoracoscopic instruments do not interfere in the outcome of uncomplicated, experimental, video-assisted pulmonary lobectomy |
author |
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO CESAR SILVA |
author_facet |
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO CESAR SILVA CASTRO,JOSUE VIANA |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
CASTRO,JOSUE VIANA |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
OLIVEIRA,LEONARDO CESAR SILVA CASTRO,JOSUE VIANA |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Surgical Instruments Performance Tests |
topic |
Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted Surgical Instruments Performance Tests |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: Since its first report, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lung lobectomy was carried out with the use of conventional surgical instruments, used in laparoscopy and open thoracotomy. These instruments are expensive, not standardized and there are a variety of models and manufacturers. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the use of these instruments on the experimental pulmonary lobectomy. Methods: We used a modified surgical simulator that uses a porcine heart-lung block filled with tomato sauce, and tested specific (Group 1) and regular (Group 2) instruments. Each group includes 15 experiments. Results: The median total time, excluding the time spent to correct the lesions, was 45.08 and 45.81 minutes, respectively in Group 1 and Group 2. There was no statistical difference between the total times (p=0.58). The only statistically different was seen for partial times regarding the elapsed time to cut and suture of lung fissures (p=0.03 and 0.04, respectively). There were more direct lesions and indirect leaks in Group 2, but without statistical significance (p=1.000 and p=0.203, respectively). The mean time spent for the diagnosis and correction of these events was 1.77 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.18 for Group 1 and 2.72 ± 1.11 minutes for Group 2 (p=0.044). Conclusion: The use of minimally invasive instruments is not associated with time improvement spent with experimental video-assisted lung lobectomy and does not lead to a faster or safer surgery. The use of VATS instruments makes correction of adverse events faster when they occur. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912020000100164 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0100-6991e-20202435 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões v.47 2020 reponame:Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) instacron:CBC |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
instacron_str |
CBC |
institution |
CBC |
reponame_str |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
collection |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões - Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistacbc@cbc.org.br |
_version_ |
1754209214644879360 |