THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertolin, Patrícia Tuma Martins
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Magacho Filho, Murilo Riccioppo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350
Resumo: Objective: This article has as object the process of women´s labor regulation in Brazil, having 1932 as its landmark. The legislation in the period is frequently presented as if it was only a women´s achievement, when it was actually also the element of their exclusion from the public space of work. Carol Smart's critique of law will make it possible to understand why.Methodology: The research used the historical-legal method (GUSTIN; DIAS; NICÁCIO, 2020, p. 80), from legal and doctrinal sources. The legislation of the time was recovered, regarding the regulation of women's work and the ideal of women spread by the Brazilian State, through its regulations, in the studied period.Results: The notion of Law as a technology of gender allowed a critical analysis of the process of legal regulation of women's work in Brazil, providing an understanding of the reasons why it legitimized the return of women to the home in the 1930s. In Smart's line, in addition to the content of the laws, it was the Law itself (discourse and form) that allowed this return.Contributions: It is intended to contribute to a critical look at the Law regarding its function to promote gender equality and non-institutional exclusion of women from the public space of work. It is believed that promoting and improving the discussion about the differentiation and binary opposition between the figure of man and woman, that is perpetuated in the field of Law, can serve this objective.
id CHRISTUS-2_5f33960789ef964f46dbcac636696b2d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4350
network_acronym_str CHRISTUS-2
network_name_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository_id_str
spelling THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIESEL PROCESO DE REGULACIÓN DEL TRABAJO DE LA MUJER EN BRASIL A LA LUZ DE LA TEORÍA DE CAROL SMART: EL DERECHO COMO TECNOLOGÍA DE GÉNEROO PROCESSO DE REGULAMENTAÇÃO DO TRABALHO FEMININO NO BRASIL À LUZ DA TEORIA DE CAROL SMART: O DIREITO COMO TECNOLOGIA DE GÊNEROwomen´s labourCarol Smartlawgender technologytrabajo de la mujerCarol Smartderechotecnología de génerotrabalho da mulherCarol Smartdireitotecnologia de gêneroObjective: This article has as object the process of women´s labor regulation in Brazil, having 1932 as its landmark. The legislation in the period is frequently presented as if it was only a women´s achievement, when it was actually also the element of their exclusion from the public space of work. Carol Smart's critique of law will make it possible to understand why.Methodology: The research used the historical-legal method (GUSTIN; DIAS; NICÁCIO, 2020, p. 80), from legal and doctrinal sources. The legislation of the time was recovered, regarding the regulation of women's work and the ideal of women spread by the Brazilian State, through its regulations, in the studied period.Results: The notion of Law as a technology of gender allowed a critical analysis of the process of legal regulation of women's work in Brazil, providing an understanding of the reasons why it legitimized the return of women to the home in the 1930s. In Smart's line, in addition to the content of the laws, it was the Law itself (discourse and form) that allowed this return.Contributions: It is intended to contribute to a critical look at the Law regarding its function to promote gender equality and non-institutional exclusion of women from the public space of work. It is believed that promoting and improving the discussion about the differentiation and binary opposition between the figure of man and woman, that is perpetuated in the field of Law, can serve this objective.Objetivo: El artículo se centra en el proceso de regulación del trabajo de la mujer en Brasil, tomando 1932 como hito. Esa legislación es presentada sólo como un logro de las mujeres, aunque también fue un factor en su exclusión del espacio público de trabajo. La crítica del derecho de Carol Smart permitirá comprender por qué.Metodología: Se utilizó el método histórico-jurídico (GUSTIN; DIAS; NICÁCIO, 2020, p. 80), basado en fuentes jurídicas y doctrinales. Se recuperó la legislación de la época, en cuanto a la regulación del trabajo de la mujer y el ideal de mujer difundido por el Estado brasileño.Resultados: La noción del Derecho como tecnología de género permitió un análisis crítico del proceso de regulación legal del trabajo de la mujer en Brasil, proporcionando una comprensión de las razones por las cuales legitimó el retorno de la mujer al hogar en la década de 1930. Además del contenido de las leyes, fue lo Derecho mismo (discurso y forma) lo que permitió este retorno: como tecnología de género, estabilizó una diferenciación entre mujeres y hombres sobre la base de la oposición binaria de la mujer cuidadora y el hombre proveedor.Contribuciones: Se pretende contribuir a una mirada crítica a lo Derecho en cuanto a su papel en la promoción de la igualdad de género y la exclusión no institucional de las mujeres del espacio público de trabajo. Se cree que promoverá la discusión sobre la oposición binaria que se perpetúa, entre el hombre y la mujer.Objetivo: O artigo tem por objeto o processo de regulamentação do trabalho das mulheres no Brasil, tomando-se 1932 como marco. A legislação, no período, é frequentemente apresentada apenas como uma conquista das mulheres, mas foi também fator de sua exclusão do espaço público de trabalho. A crítica do direito em Carol Smart possibilita compreender o porquê.Metodologia: Foi utilizado o método histórico-jurídico (GUSTIN; DIAS; NICÁCIO, 2020, p. 80), a partir de fontes legais e doutrinárias. Recuperou-se a legislação da época, no que concerne à regulamentação do trabalho das mulheres e ao ideal de mulher difundido pelo Estado brasileiro, por meio de suas normativas, no período estudado.Resultados: A noção do Direito como tecnologia de gênero permitiu uma análise crítica do processo de regulamentação jurídica do trabalho das mulheres no Brasil e dos motivos pelos quais legitimou o retorno das mulheres ao lar nos anos 30. Para além do conteúdo das leis, o próprio Direito (discurso e forma) permitia esse retorno, já que, enquanto tecnologia de gênero, estabilizava uma diferenciação entre mulheres e homens à base da oposição binária da mulher cuidadora e do homem provedor.Contribuições: Pretende-se contribuir para um olhar crítico sobre o Direito no tocante a sua função para promoção da igualdade de gênero e não exclusão institucional das mulheres do espaço público do trabalho. Acredita-se que promover e aprimorar a discussão sobre a diferenciação e oposição binária que se perpetua, no campo do Direito, entre a figura do homem e da mulher, possa servir a esse objetivo.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)2023-06-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo - Método Históricoapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/435010.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p45-72.2023Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No. 38 (2023); 45-72Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 Núm. 38 (2023); 45-72Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No 38 (2023); 45-72Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 21 n. 38 (2023); 45-722447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.2023reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350/1789https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350/1805Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertolin, Patrícia Tuma MartinsMagacho Filho, Murilo Riccioppo2024-02-06T18:16:45Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/4350Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2024-02-06T18:16:45Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
EL PROCESO DE REGULACIÓN DEL TRABAJO DE LA MUJER EN BRASIL A LA LUZ DE LA TEORÍA DE CAROL SMART: EL DERECHO COMO TECNOLOGÍA DE GÉNERO
O PROCESSO DE REGULAMENTAÇÃO DO TRABALHO FEMININO NO BRASIL À LUZ DA TEORIA DE CAROL SMART: O DIREITO COMO TECNOLOGIA DE GÊNERO
title THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
spellingShingle THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
Bertolin, Patrícia Tuma Martins
women´s labour
Carol Smart
law
gender technology
trabajo de la mujer
Carol Smart
derecho
tecnología de género
trabalho da mulher
Carol Smart
direito
tecnologia de gênero
title_short THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
title_full THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
title_fullStr THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
title_full_unstemmed THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
title_sort THE REGULATION PROCESS OF WOMEN´S LABOR IN BRAZIL IN VIEW OF THE THEORY OF CAROL SMART: LAW AS GENDER TECHNOLOGIES
author Bertolin, Patrícia Tuma Martins
author_facet Bertolin, Patrícia Tuma Martins
Magacho Filho, Murilo Riccioppo
author_role author
author2 Magacho Filho, Murilo Riccioppo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertolin, Patrícia Tuma Martins
Magacho Filho, Murilo Riccioppo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv women´s labour
Carol Smart
law
gender technology
trabajo de la mujer
Carol Smart
derecho
tecnología de género
trabalho da mulher
Carol Smart
direito
tecnologia de gênero
topic women´s labour
Carol Smart
law
gender technology
trabajo de la mujer
Carol Smart
derecho
tecnología de género
trabalho da mulher
Carol Smart
direito
tecnologia de gênero
description Objective: This article has as object the process of women´s labor regulation in Brazil, having 1932 as its landmark. The legislation in the period is frequently presented as if it was only a women´s achievement, when it was actually also the element of their exclusion from the public space of work. Carol Smart's critique of law will make it possible to understand why.Methodology: The research used the historical-legal method (GUSTIN; DIAS; NICÁCIO, 2020, p. 80), from legal and doctrinal sources. The legislation of the time was recovered, regarding the regulation of women's work and the ideal of women spread by the Brazilian State, through its regulations, in the studied period.Results: The notion of Law as a technology of gender allowed a critical analysis of the process of legal regulation of women's work in Brazil, providing an understanding of the reasons why it legitimized the return of women to the home in the 1930s. In Smart's line, in addition to the content of the laws, it was the Law itself (discourse and form) that allowed this return.Contributions: It is intended to contribute to a critical look at the Law regarding its function to promote gender equality and non-institutional exclusion of women from the public space of work. It is believed that promoting and improving the discussion about the differentiation and binary opposition between the figure of man and woman, that is perpetuated in the field of Law, can serve this objective.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-06-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo - Método Histórico
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p45-72.2023
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350
identifier_str_mv 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.p45-72.2023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350/1789
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4350/1805
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No. 38 (2023); 45-72
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 Núm. 38 (2023); 45-72
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); Vol. 21 No 38 (2023); 45-72
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 21 n. 38 (2023); 45-72
2447-6641
1806-0420
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v21i38.2023
reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron:UNICHRISTUS
instname_str Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron_str UNICHRISTUS
institution UNICHRISTUS
reponame_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
collection Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1797052896097861632

Registros relacionados