The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira Filho, Benedito Cerezzo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Moraes, Daniela Marques de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conpedi Law Review
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3349
Resumo: Access to justice does not limit itself to the sole faculty of adjudicating or contesting a given action. This rather simple notion has left juridical and jurisdictional theory and practice a while ago. In order for the magnitude of this institute be achieved, it is neces- sary to analyze Right and judicial power, taking into consideration the historical contin- gency, the juridical-evaluative changes and, therefore, the very notion of jurisdiction. The understanding of rights and wrongs of the past is obligatory to understanding the present and projecting oneself into the future. This connection between today and tomorrow shall illuminate the true reach of the access to justice. On the other hand, working the new, held tight against the walls of the past, is denying or, at least, blurring the unders- tanding that is desired as answer to social demand taken to accountability in a judicial decision. It is, hence, essential to transcend times without falling in the trap of discussing once more the theories of the past. It does not mean denying them, but respecting their content, while considering the historical contingency to which they were submitted to. The notion of access to justice, then, should be attached to the theories of its own time, separated from those of  long gone periods. It is denying access to justice when one does not allow a theory in which one can understand the ‘action’ as a fundamental right and deserving of the utmost protection by the State because it truly and effectively guards certain rights. In this point, the performance of the judge is of vital importance for the civil procedure to fulfill its constitutional function of delivering to the claimants an ade- quate, timely and effective judicial protection. That is why the vision and the concept of jurisdiction are equally relevant.
id CONPEDI-4_55f6b13bf98dd9215ffa2eed90993d4e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3349
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-4
network_name_str Conpedi Law Review
repository_id_str
spelling The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to JusticeA Imprescindível Reforma no e do Poder Judiciário como Corolários do Acesso à JustiçaAccess to justiceJudiciary powerJurisdictionReform.Acesso à justiçaPoder judiciárioJurisdiçãoReforma.Access to justice does not limit itself to the sole faculty of adjudicating or contesting a given action. This rather simple notion has left juridical and jurisdictional theory and practice a while ago. In order for the magnitude of this institute be achieved, it is neces- sary to analyze Right and judicial power, taking into consideration the historical contin- gency, the juridical-evaluative changes and, therefore, the very notion of jurisdiction. The understanding of rights and wrongs of the past is obligatory to understanding the present and projecting oneself into the future. This connection between today and tomorrow shall illuminate the true reach of the access to justice. On the other hand, working the new, held tight against the walls of the past, is denying or, at least, blurring the unders- tanding that is desired as answer to social demand taken to accountability in a judicial decision. It is, hence, essential to transcend times without falling in the trap of discussing once more the theories of the past. It does not mean denying them, but respecting their content, while considering the historical contingency to which they were submitted to. The notion of access to justice, then, should be attached to the theories of its own time, separated from those of  long gone periods. It is denying access to justice when one does not allow a theory in which one can understand the ‘action’ as a fundamental right and deserving of the utmost protection by the State because it truly and effectively guards certain rights. In this point, the performance of the judge is of vital importance for the civil procedure to fulfill its constitutional function of delivering to the claimants an ade- quate, timely and effective judicial protection. That is why the vision and the concept of jurisdiction are equally relevant.O acesso à justiça não se esgota na mera faculdade de se ajuizar e/ou de se ontestar uma ação. Esta singela orientação, há muito, deixou de permear a teoria e a prática jurídica e jurisdicional. Para que a magnitude desse relevante instituto seja alcançada, é necessário analisar o direito e o poder judiciário, levando-se em consideração a questão histórica, as mudanças jurídico-valorativas e, por conseguinte, a própria noção sobre jurisdição. A compreensão dos acertos e equívocos do passado é indispensável a fim de que se possa entender o presente e se projetar o futuro. Esse compromisso com o hoje e o amanhã iluminará o real alcance do acesso à justiça. Por outro lado, trabalhar o novo, preso às verdades do passado, é negar ou, no mínimo, dificultar o entendimento do que se pretende como resposta às demandas sociais levadas à responsabilização de uma decisão judicial. É, portanto, essencial transcender épocas, sem cair na armadilha de discutir o novo com as teorias do passado. Não significa negá-las, mas, respeitar seu conteúdo, considerando a época em que foram elaboradas. A visão de acesso à justiça, então, deve estar adstrita às teorias do seu tempo, abstraída daquelas de outros idos. Nega-se acesso à justiça, por exemplo, ao não se permitir uma teoria que possa compreender a ‘ação’ como direito fundamental e merecedora da mais ampla proteção estatal pela efetiva tutela dos direitos. Neste ponto, a atuação do juiz é de extrema importância para que o direito processual civil cumpra sua função constitucional de entregar ao jurisdicionado uma tutela adequada, tempestiva e efetiva. Daí porque ser igualmente relevante a visão que se tem, ou que se deve ter do conceito de jurisdição.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/334910.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3349Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 114-1442448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3349/2870Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira Filho, Benedito CerezzoMoraes, Daniela Marques de2021-08-20T02:10:33Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3349Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:33Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
A Imprescindível Reforma no e do Poder Judiciário como Corolários do Acesso à Justiça
title The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
spellingShingle The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
Pereira Filho, Benedito Cerezzo
Access to justice
Judiciary power
Jurisdiction
Reform.
Acesso à justiça
Poder judiciário
Jurisdição
Reforma.
title_short The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
title_full The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
title_fullStr The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
title_full_unstemmed The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
title_sort The Indispensable Reform and the Judiciary as Corollaries Access to Justice
author Pereira Filho, Benedito Cerezzo
author_facet Pereira Filho, Benedito Cerezzo
Moraes, Daniela Marques de
author_role author
author2 Moraes, Daniela Marques de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira Filho, Benedito Cerezzo
Moraes, Daniela Marques de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Access to justice
Judiciary power
Jurisdiction
Reform.
Acesso à justiça
Poder judiciário
Jurisdição
Reforma.
topic Access to justice
Judiciary power
Jurisdiction
Reform.
Acesso à justiça
Poder judiciário
Jurisdição
Reforma.
description Access to justice does not limit itself to the sole faculty of adjudicating or contesting a given action. This rather simple notion has left juridical and jurisdictional theory and practice a while ago. In order for the magnitude of this institute be achieved, it is neces- sary to analyze Right and judicial power, taking into consideration the historical contin- gency, the juridical-evaluative changes and, therefore, the very notion of jurisdiction. The understanding of rights and wrongs of the past is obligatory to understanding the present and projecting oneself into the future. This connection between today and tomorrow shall illuminate the true reach of the access to justice. On the other hand, working the new, held tight against the walls of the past, is denying or, at least, blurring the unders- tanding that is desired as answer to social demand taken to accountability in a judicial decision. It is, hence, essential to transcend times without falling in the trap of discussing once more the theories of the past. It does not mean denying them, but respecting their content, while considering the historical contingency to which they were submitted to. The notion of access to justice, then, should be attached to the theories of its own time, separated from those of  long gone periods. It is denying access to justice when one does not allow a theory in which one can understand the ‘action’ as a fundamental right and deserving of the utmost protection by the State because it truly and effectively guards certain rights. In this point, the performance of the judge is of vital importance for the civil procedure to fulfill its constitutional function of delivering to the claimants an ade- quate, timely and effective judicial protection. That is why the vision and the concept of jurisdiction are equally relevant.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3349
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3349
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3349
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3349
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3349/2870
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 114-144
2448-3931
2448-3931
reponame:Conpedi Law Review
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Conpedi Law Review
collection Conpedi Law Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1809730144341852160