Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000300056 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. Methods: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. Results: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency. |
id |
DPI-1_395fce7e93bbabac32552c86f7cc4f14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000300056 |
network_acronym_str |
DPI-1 |
network_name_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implantsCorrective OrthodonticsTooth intrusionBone screwsABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. Methods: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. Results: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency.Dental Press International2016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000300056Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.3 2016reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.056-066.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaccini,Juliana Volpato CuriCotrim-Ferreira,Flávio AugustoFerreira,Flávio VelliniFreitas,Karina Maria Salvatore deCançado,Rodrigo HermontValarelli,Fabrício Pinellieng2016-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512016000300056Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2016-07-12T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
title |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
spellingShingle |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants Paccini,Juliana Volpato Curi Corrective Orthodontics Tooth intrusion Bone screws |
title_short |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
title_full |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
title_fullStr |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
title_sort |
Efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with mini-implants |
author |
Paccini,Juliana Volpato Curi |
author_facet |
Paccini,Juliana Volpato Curi Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto Ferreira,Flávio Vellini Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Valarelli,Fabrício Pinelli |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto Ferreira,Flávio Vellini Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Valarelli,Fabrício Pinelli |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paccini,Juliana Volpato Curi Cotrim-Ferreira,Flávio Augusto Ferreira,Flávio Vellini Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore de Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont Valarelli,Fabrício Pinelli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Corrective Orthodontics Tooth intrusion Bone screws |
topic |
Corrective Orthodontics Tooth intrusion Bone screws |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of two protocols for maxillary molar intrusion with two or three mini-implants. Methods: Twenty five maxillary first molars extruded for loss of their antagonists in adult subjects were selected. The sample was divided into two groups, according to the intrusion protocol with two or three mini-implants. Group 1 consisted of 15 molars that were intruded by two mini-implants. Group 2 consisted of 10 molars intruded by three mini-implants. Changes with treatment were analyzed in lateral cephalograms at the beginning and at the end of intrusion of maxillary molars. Results: Results showed that there was no difference in efficiency for the two intrusion protocols. It was concluded that extruded maxillary molars can be intruded with two or three mini-implants with similar efficiency. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000300056 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000300056 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2177-6709.21.3.056-066.oar |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press International |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.3 2016 reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics instname:Dental Press International (DPI) instacron:DPI |
instname_str |
Dental Press International (DPI) |
instacron_str |
DPI |
institution |
DPI |
reponame_str |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
collection |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1754122397637672960 |