Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yashwant V.,Aniruddh
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: K.,Ravi, Arumugam,Edeinton
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400050
Resumo: Abstract Objective: To compare soft tissue changes in Class I borderline cases treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities. Methods: A parent sample of 150 patients with Class I dental and skeletal malocclusion (89 patients treated with premolar extraction and 61 patients without extraction) was randomly selected and subjected to discriminant analysis which identified the borderline sample of 44 patients (22 extraction and 22 nonextraction patients). Pretreatment and post-treatment cephalograms of the borderline subsample were analyzed using 22 soft tissue parameters. Results: Upper and lower lips were more retracted and thickness of the upper lip increased more in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). The nasolabial angle became more obtuse and the interlabial gap was reduced in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). Lower lip, interlabial gap and nasolabial angle showed no changes in the borderline nonextraction cases. Conclusion: The soft tissue parameters which can be used as guideline in decision making to choose either extraction or nonextraction in Class I borderline cases are upper and lower lip protrusion in relation to the E-plane and Sn-Pg' line, lower lip protrusion in relation to the true vertical line (TVL), upper lip thickness, nasolabial angle and interlabial gap.
id DPI-1_d18ebce3cf3697480d670d91811f6617
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000400050
network_acronym_str DPI-1
network_name_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalitiesAngle Class I malocclusionBorderline casesDiscriminant analysisSoft tissue changesAbstract Objective: To compare soft tissue changes in Class I borderline cases treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities. Methods: A parent sample of 150 patients with Class I dental and skeletal malocclusion (89 patients treated with premolar extraction and 61 patients without extraction) was randomly selected and subjected to discriminant analysis which identified the borderline sample of 44 patients (22 extraction and 22 nonextraction patients). Pretreatment and post-treatment cephalograms of the borderline subsample were analyzed using 22 soft tissue parameters. Results: Upper and lower lips were more retracted and thickness of the upper lip increased more in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). The nasolabial angle became more obtuse and the interlabial gap was reduced in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). Lower lip, interlabial gap and nasolabial angle showed no changes in the borderline nonextraction cases. Conclusion: The soft tissue parameters which can be used as guideline in decision making to choose either extraction or nonextraction in Class I borderline cases are upper and lower lip protrusion in relation to the E-plane and Sn-Pg' line, lower lip protrusion in relation to the true vertical line (TVL), upper lip thickness, nasolabial angle and interlabial gap.Dental Press International2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400050Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.4 2016reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodonticsinstname:Dental Press International (DPI)instacron:DPI10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.050-059.oarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessYashwant V.,AniruddhK.,RaviArumugam,Edeintoneng2016-09-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2176-94512016000400050Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/dpjoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpartigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com2177-67092176-9451opendoar:2016-09-19T00:00Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
title Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
spellingShingle Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
Yashwant V.,Aniruddh
Angle Class I malocclusion
Borderline cases
Discriminant analysis
Soft tissue changes
title_short Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
title_full Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
title_sort Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities
author Yashwant V.,Aniruddh
author_facet Yashwant V.,Aniruddh
K.,Ravi
Arumugam,Edeinton
author_role author
author2 K.,Ravi
Arumugam,Edeinton
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yashwant V.,Aniruddh
K.,Ravi
Arumugam,Edeinton
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Angle Class I malocclusion
Borderline cases
Discriminant analysis
Soft tissue changes
topic Angle Class I malocclusion
Borderline cases
Discriminant analysis
Soft tissue changes
description Abstract Objective: To compare soft tissue changes in Class I borderline cases treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities. Methods: A parent sample of 150 patients with Class I dental and skeletal malocclusion (89 patients treated with premolar extraction and 61 patients without extraction) was randomly selected and subjected to discriminant analysis which identified the borderline sample of 44 patients (22 extraction and 22 nonextraction patients). Pretreatment and post-treatment cephalograms of the borderline subsample were analyzed using 22 soft tissue parameters. Results: Upper and lower lips were more retracted and thickness of the upper lip increased more in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). The nasolabial angle became more obtuse and the interlabial gap was reduced in the borderline extraction cases (p < 0.01). Lower lip, interlabial gap and nasolabial angle showed no changes in the borderline nonextraction cases. Conclusion: The soft tissue parameters which can be used as guideline in decision making to choose either extraction or nonextraction in Class I borderline cases are upper and lower lip protrusion in relation to the E-plane and Sn-Pg' line, lower lip protrusion in relation to the true vertical line (TVL), upper lip thickness, nasolabial angle and interlabial gap.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400050
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400050
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.050-059.oar
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press International
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.4 2016
reponame:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
instname:Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron:DPI
instname_str Dental Press International (DPI)
instacron_str DPI
institution DPI
reponame_str Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
collection Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics - Dental Press International (DPI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv artigos@dentalpress.com.br||davidnormando@hotmail.com
_version_ 1754122397653401600