The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dantas, Magali
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491
Resumo: This paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness.
id DPU_9eb512442c00d02c489ad5ce59f650f8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/491
network_acronym_str DPU
network_name_str Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019A política de cotas para negros nos concursos a magistratura: resultados na Justiça Federal 2016-2019Políticas públicasAções afirmativasCotasPoder judiciárioMagistraturaPublic policyAffirmative actionsQuotasJudiciaryFederal judgeThis paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness.Este artigo apresenta os achados da investigação dos resultados da implementação da Resolução nº 203/2015 do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ), que determina a reserva de 20% das vagas para pessoas negras em todos os concursos do Poder Judiciário. Com foco nos concursos para a magistratura federal, realizados entre 2016 e 2019, o estudo tem o objetivo de revelar se houve resultados efetivos, ou seja, se as cotas incluíram pessoas negras no cargo de juiz federal. A pesquisa, de caráter qualitativo e quantitativo, dedica-se a compreender as decisões e as estratégias adotadas na interpretação e na regulação pelo CNJ, bem como a implementação da resolução pelos tribunais regionais federais (TRF), quando na execução dos certames. O trabalho de descortinar a implementação de tal resolução é necessário para que se revele de que forma a sua operacionalização contribui para que a segregação racial pré-existente no cargo de juiz federal ainda permaneça estável. Assim, diante da inefetividade demonstrada pelos resultados, a interpretação aborda o manejo dos instrumentos da ação pública em diálogo com as práticas adotadas pelos tribunais e a análise prossegue no sentido de caracterizar e comparar a operacionalização dos certames para identificar mecanismos institucionais, decisões e comportamentos da burocracia que possam estar relacionados à baixa efetividade da reserva de vagas. As contribuições deste trabalho são para um diagnóstico dos resultados, apresentando recomendações para o aperfeiçoamento da implementação (policy brief) elaboradas à luz dos normativos vigentes, uma vez que o próprio formulador aponta antídotos para contornar uma possível baixa efetividade.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2022-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/49110.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-1862448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i17reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491/326Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da Uniãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDantas, Magali2022-07-12T15:15:20Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/491Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:38.117819Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
A política de cotas para negros nos concursos a magistratura: resultados na Justiça Federal 2016-2019
title The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
spellingShingle The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
Dantas, Magali
Políticas públicas
Ações afirmativas
Cotas
Poder judiciário
Magistratura
Public policy
Affirmative actions
Quotas
Judiciary
Federal judge
title_short The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
title_full The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
title_fullStr The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
title_full_unstemmed The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
title_sort The results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for Federal Judiciary held between 2016 and 2019
author Dantas, Magali
author_facet Dantas, Magali
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dantas, Magali
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Políticas públicas
Ações afirmativas
Cotas
Poder judiciário
Magistratura
Public policy
Affirmative actions
Quotas
Judiciary
Federal judge
topic Políticas públicas
Ações afirmativas
Cotas
Poder judiciário
Magistratura
Public policy
Affirmative actions
Quotas
Judiciary
Federal judge
description This paper is dedicated to investigating the results of the implementation of the standard in competitions for federal judiciary held between 2016 and 2019. In order to reveal whether there were effective results, that is, if the quotas included black people in the position of federal judge. The research dedicated itself to understanding the decisions and strategies adopted in its interpretation and regulation made by the CNJ, as well as in its implementation by the federal regional courts when executing contests. However, in the preliminary phase of the empirical investigation, it was noticed that no black person was approved by the vacancy reservation in the federal regional court that had already applied for the quotas. Thus, the analysis proceeds to characterize and compare the operationalization of the competitions to identify institutional mechanisms, as well as decisions of institutions responding to the implementation and behaviors of the bureaucracy, which may be related to the low effectiveness of the vacancy reserve. Given the ineffectiveness shown by the results, the interpretation addresses the handling of public action instruments, the repertoire and available possibilities put into dialogue with the practices adopted by the courts. The contribution of the work are a diagnosis of the results in the Federal Courts also the presentation of recommendations for the improvement of the implementation (policy brief), elaborated in the light of the current regulations, since, the formulator himself points out antidotes to circumvent a possible low effectiveness.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491
10.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186
url https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491
identifier_str_mv 10.46901/revistadadpu.i17.p171-186
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/491/326
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 17 (2022): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 171-186
2448-4555
1984-0322
10.46901/revistadadpu.i17
reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
instacron:DPU
instname_str Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
instacron_str DPU
institution DPU
reponame_str Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
collection Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br
_version_ 1797054103211212800