Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hewitt, George Berlyn
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097
Resumo: Spittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages.
id EMBRAPA-4_3199a46a08ff09a05d15e8749f5c15eb
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15097
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central BrazilFatores ambientais que afetam a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens durante a estação seca, no Brasil Centralspider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhensaranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbensSpittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages.Foram comparadas a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens e a eclosão de ninfas em pastagens com diferentes características vegetativas e intensidades de pastejo. Amostras de ovos foram colocadas no interior de pastagens, no início da estação seca, e recuperadas antes de se iniciarem as eclosões. O número de ovos recuperados nas áreas que apresentavam palha em decomposição foi significativamente maior (P<0,05) do que nas áreas descobertas. O índice de mortalidade por predadores foi estimado em 73%. Dos ovos recuperados, 34% estiveram ressecados e 35% inviáveis. A sobrevivência de ovos foi estimada como sendo de 8,5% e foi maior nas pastagens com as seguintes características: 1) altura do capim > 30 cm; 2) abundância de palha em decomposição; 3) área coberta pela forrageira > 50%; e 4) pastejo mínimo ou ausente. Mais predadores, particularmente  aranhas (Araneida), também foram coletados neste tipo de pastagem. Em um dos locais houve maior percentual de eclosões (74%) nos ovos mantidos no pasto alto, em comparação ao pasto baixo (59%). Embora o pasto alto seja menos danificado por cigarrinhas, as desvantagens de mantê-lo com altura superior a 30 cm parecem sobrepujar as eventuais vantagens.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraHewitt, George Berlyn2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-12431678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAenghttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097/8858info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-11-03T17:25:21Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15097Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-11-03T17:25:21Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
Fatores ambientais que afetam a sobrevivência de ovos das cigarrinhas-das-pastagens durante a estação seca, no Brasil Central
title Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
spellingShingle Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
Hewitt, George Berlyn
spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens
aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens
title_short Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
title_full Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
title_fullStr Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
title_sort Environmental factors affecting spittlebug egg survival during the dry season in Central Brazil
author Hewitt, George Berlyn
author_facet Hewitt, George Berlyn
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hewitt, George Berlyn
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens
aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens
topic spider; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois flavopicta; Brachiaria decumhens
aranha; Araneida; Zulia entreriana; Deois; flavopicta; Brachiaria decumbens
description Spittlebug egg survival and hatching was compared in pastures where differences occurred in vegetative characteristics and grazing intensity. Egg samples were placed in pastures at the start of the dry season and recovered before hatching began. Significantly (P<0.05) more eggs were recovered from areas where litter was present than from bare soil areas. Mortality from predators and scavengers was estimated at 73%. An additional 34% of the eggs were desiccated and 35% were nonviable. Egg survival was estimated to be 8.5% and was greater in pastures with the following characteristics: 1) canopy height > 30 cm; 2) abundant litter; 3) plant cover > 50%; 4) minimal or no grazing. More predators, especially spiders (Araneida) were also collected from these types of pastures. At one site more eggs hatched in a high grass pasture (74%) than in a low grass pasture (59%). Although high grass may receive less damage from spittlebug feeding the disadvantages of maintaining grass > 30 cm appear to outweigh the advantages.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15097/8858
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.21, n.12, dez. 1986; 1237-1243
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416678502039552