Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500 |
Resumo: | Different sources of organic matter were compared in the commercial production of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cv. Aodai Nazaré in a dark red latosol under Cerrado (savannah). The experimental design was in randomized complete blocks with four replications and seven treatments: chicken manure (10 t/ha), cattle manure (20 t/ha), and processed garbage (30 t/ha) enriched with O, 5.4, 10.8 or 16.2 kg N/t, besides the check. Organic matter significantly improved marketable yield in cucumber. Treatments involving processed garbage were in general similar to the more traditional sources of organic matter. Chicken manure treatment outyielded cattle manure. In general, there was no advantage concerning the physic production volume to the N enrichment of processed garbage. The treatments were also analysed under a decision model that takes both profitability and risks into account. The best treatments under this perspective were chicken manure (10 t/ha) and processed garbage enriched with 10.8kg N/t of processed garbag. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_641f19d5499bed1e0eec1a4325bc44e6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15500 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumberAvaliação agroeconômica do uso de matéria orgânica na produção comercial de pepinonitrogen; stochastic dominance; profitability; risks; Cucumis sativusnitrogênio; dominância estocástica; rentabilidade; risco; Cucumis sativusDifferent sources of organic matter were compared in the commercial production of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cv. Aodai Nazaré in a dark red latosol under Cerrado (savannah). The experimental design was in randomized complete blocks with four replications and seven treatments: chicken manure (10 t/ha), cattle manure (20 t/ha), and processed garbage (30 t/ha) enriched with O, 5.4, 10.8 or 16.2 kg N/t, besides the check. Organic matter significantly improved marketable yield in cucumber. Treatments involving processed garbage were in general similar to the more traditional sources of organic matter. Chicken manure treatment outyielded cattle manure. In general, there was no advantage concerning the physic production volume to the N enrichment of processed garbage. The treatments were also analysed under a decision model that takes both profitability and risks into account. The best treatments under this perspective were chicken manure (10 t/ha) and processed garbage enriched with 10.8kg N/t of processed garbag.Foram comparadas diferentes fontes de matéria orgânica na produção comercial do pepino (Cucumis sativus) cv. Aodai Nazaré em Latossolo Vermelho-Escuro (LE), sob vegetação de cerrado. Utilizou-se o delineamento experimental em blocos casualizados, com quatro repetições e sete tratamentos: esterco de galinha (10 t/ha), esterco de curral (20 t/ha), lixo industrializado (30 t/ha) enriquecido com 0; 5, 4; 10, 8 e 16,2 kg de N/t de lixo e testemunha. A matéria orgânica foi eficiente na produção comercial de pepino, aumentando a produtividade; o lixo industrializado teve eficiência compatível com a apresentada pelas fontes tradicionais de matéria orgânica. Entre estas fontes, o esterco de galinha superou significativamente a produção do esterco de curral. Em geral, não há vantagem quanto ao volume físico de produção no enriquecimento do lixo industrializado com N. Os tratamentos foram analisados sob um processo de decisão que considerou tanto a rentabilidade como os riscos. Os melhores tratamentos sob este aspecto foram esterco de galinha (10 t/ha) e lixo industrializado tratado com 10,8 kg N/t lixo.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraLima, José de AlmeidaLopes, José FlávioCastor, Otoniel SoaresHorino, YoshihikoSouza, Antonio Francisco2014-04-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, n.4, abr. 1984; 407-410Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, n.4, abr. 1984; 407-4101678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500/9455info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-16T19:19:21Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15500Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-16T19:19:21Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber Avaliação agroeconômica do uso de matéria orgânica na produção comercial de pepino |
title |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
spellingShingle |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber Lima, José de Almeida nitrogen; stochastic dominance; profitability; risks; Cucumis sativus nitrogênio; dominância estocástica; rentabilidade; risco; Cucumis sativus |
title_short |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
title_full |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
title_fullStr |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
title_sort |
Agro-economical evaluation of organic mather use in the comercial production of cucumber |
author |
Lima, José de Almeida |
author_facet |
Lima, José de Almeida Lopes, José Flávio Castor, Otoniel Soares Horino, Yoshihiko Souza, Antonio Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lopes, José Flávio Castor, Otoniel Soares Horino, Yoshihiko Souza, Antonio Francisco |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, José de Almeida Lopes, José Flávio Castor, Otoniel Soares Horino, Yoshihiko Souza, Antonio Francisco |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
nitrogen; stochastic dominance; profitability; risks; Cucumis sativus nitrogênio; dominância estocástica; rentabilidade; risco; Cucumis sativus |
topic |
nitrogen; stochastic dominance; profitability; risks; Cucumis sativus nitrogênio; dominância estocástica; rentabilidade; risco; Cucumis sativus |
description |
Different sources of organic matter were compared in the commercial production of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) cv. Aodai Nazaré in a dark red latosol under Cerrado (savannah). The experimental design was in randomized complete blocks with four replications and seven treatments: chicken manure (10 t/ha), cattle manure (20 t/ha), and processed garbage (30 t/ha) enriched with O, 5.4, 10.8 or 16.2 kg N/t, besides the check. Organic matter significantly improved marketable yield in cucumber. Treatments involving processed garbage were in general similar to the more traditional sources of organic matter. Chicken manure treatment outyielded cattle manure. In general, there was no advantage concerning the physic production volume to the N enrichment of processed garbage. The treatments were also analysed under a decision model that takes both profitability and risks into account. The best treatments under this perspective were chicken manure (10 t/ha) and processed garbage enriched with 10.8kg N/t of processed garbag. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-16 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15500/9455 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.19, n.4, abr. 1984; 407-410 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.19, n.4, abr. 1984; 407-410 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416676858920960 |