Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Renato Rosa
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Magnabosco, Diogo, Bierhals, Thomas, Gaggini, Thais Schwarz, Bernardi, Mari Lourdes, Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo, Wentz, Ivo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175
Resumo: The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system.
id EMBRAPA-4_e86180b90a1871722edac8bcee41acf0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/12175
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systemsIndução de puberdade em leitoas com diferentes idades em dois sistemas de manejostimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous.The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system.O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o efeito do método de exposição ao macho e da idade da leitoa, por ocasião da exposição, sobre o percentual de manifestação do primeiro estro, idade de início da puberdade e intervalo entre estímulo e puberdade. Leitoas Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White foram induzidas à puberdade com dois sistemas de exposição ao macho – Baia, estímulo feito pela introdução de macho na baia das fêmeas; Bear, estímulo feito pela colocação de fêmeas na área de permanência de machos –, em três idades de início do estímulo – 150, 170 e 200 dias. Não houve diferença entre os sistemas de estimulação quanto à percentagem de leitoas em estro, idade à puberdade e intervalo entre estimulação e puberdade. Esse intervalo foi menor, quando a exposição das fêmeas foi feita aos 200 dias de idade, e a proporção de fêmeas que atingiram a puberdade aos 10, 20, 30 e 42 dias após o início da exposição foi maior. A indução da puberdade tem maior sucesso quando a exposição da fêmea ao macho é feita aos 200 dias de idade, independentemente do sistema de estimulação.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCNPq, CAPESCNPq, CAPESRibeiro, Renato RosaMagnabosco, DiogoBierhals, ThomasGaggini, Thais SchwarzBernardi, Mari LourdesBortolozzo, Fernando PandolfoWentz, Ivo2012-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-15231678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175/8113https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/12175/7789info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-11-29T20:06:19Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/12175Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2012-11-29T20:06:19Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
Indução de puberdade em leitoas com diferentes idades em dois sistemas de manejo
title Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
spellingShingle Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
Ribeiro, Renato Rosa
stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous.
title_short Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
title_full Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
title_fullStr Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
title_full_unstemmed Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
title_sort Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
author Ribeiro, Renato Rosa
author_facet Ribeiro, Renato Rosa
Magnabosco, Diogo
Bierhals, Thomas
Gaggini, Thais Schwarz
Bernardi, Mari Lourdes
Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo
Wentz, Ivo
author_role author
author2 Magnabosco, Diogo
Bierhals, Thomas
Gaggini, Thais Schwarz
Bernardi, Mari Lourdes
Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo
Wentz, Ivo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv CNPq, CAPES
CNPq, CAPES
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Renato Rosa
Magnabosco, Diogo
Bierhals, Thomas
Gaggini, Thais Schwarz
Bernardi, Mari Lourdes
Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo
Wentz, Ivo
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous.
topic stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous.
description The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-11-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175/8113
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/12175/7789
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416712813543425