Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_e86180b90a1871722edac8bcee41acf0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/12175 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systemsIndução de puberdade em leitoas com diferentes idades em dois sistemas de manejostimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous.The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system.O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar o efeito do método de exposição ao macho e da idade da leitoa, por ocasião da exposição, sobre o percentual de manifestação do primeiro estro, idade de início da puberdade e intervalo entre estímulo e puberdade. Leitoas Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White foram induzidas à puberdade com dois sistemas de exposição ao macho – Baia, estímulo feito pela introdução de macho na baia das fêmeas; Bear, estímulo feito pela colocação de fêmeas na área de permanência de machos –, em três idades de início do estímulo – 150, 170 e 200 dias. Não houve diferença entre os sistemas de estimulação quanto à percentagem de leitoas em estro, idade à puberdade e intervalo entre estimulação e puberdade. Esse intervalo foi menor, quando a exposição das fêmeas foi feita aos 200 dias de idade, e a proporção de fêmeas que atingiram a puberdade aos 10, 20, 30 e 42 dias após o início da exposição foi maior. A indução da puberdade tem maior sucesso quando a exposição da fêmea ao macho é feita aos 200 dias de idade, independentemente do sistema de estimulação.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraCNPq, CAPESCNPq, CAPESRibeiro, Renato RosaMagnabosco, DiogoBierhals, ThomasGaggini, Thais SchwarzBernardi, Mari LourdesBortolozzo, Fernando PandolfoWentz, Ivo2012-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-15231678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175/8113https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/12175/7789info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-11-29T20:06:19Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/12175Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2012-11-29T20:06:19Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems Indução de puberdade em leitoas com diferentes idades em dois sistemas de manejo |
title |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
spellingShingle |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems Ribeiro, Renato Rosa stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous. |
title_short |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
title_full |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
title_fullStr |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
title_sort |
Puberty induction in gilts at different ages in two management systems |
author |
Ribeiro, Renato Rosa |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Renato Rosa Magnabosco, Diogo Bierhals, Thomas Gaggini, Thais Schwarz Bernardi, Mari Lourdes Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo Wentz, Ivo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magnabosco, Diogo Bierhals, Thomas Gaggini, Thais Schwarz Bernardi, Mari Lourdes Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo Wentz, Ivo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
CNPq, CAPES CNPq, CAPES |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Renato Rosa Magnabosco, Diogo Bierhals, Thomas Gaggini, Thais Schwarz Bernardi, Mari Lourdes Bortolozzo, Fernando Pandolfo Wentz, Ivo |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous. |
topic |
stimulation of puberty; age of first estrus; nulliparous. |
description |
The objective of this work was to determine the effect of boar‑exposure method and of gilt age at exposure on the percentage of first estrus manifestation, puberty age, and interval between stimulus and puberty. Danbred F1 Landrace x Large White gilts were induced to puberty with two different systems of boar exposure – Baia, stimuli done by putting a male inside the pens of gilts; Bear, stimuli done by putting the females in an area with males –, and three ages at the beginning of stimulation – 150, 170 and 200 days. There was no difference between the stimulation systems for the percentage of gilts in estrus, puberty age, and the interval between stimulation and estrus onset. This interval was lower when stimulus started at 200 days, and the proportion of gilts which reached puberty at 10, 20, 30 and 42 days after the beginning of boar‑exposure was higher. Puberty induction has higher success when the female exposure to the male is done at 200 days, regardless of the boar‑exposure system. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-11-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/12175/8113 https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/12175/7789 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.47, n.10, out. 2012; 1518-1523 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416712813543425 |