Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Arruda, Daniel Meira
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Batista, Márcio Luiz, Simão, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de Castro, Duque-Brasil, Reinaldo, Ferreira-Júnior, Walnir Gomes, Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynald
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/380
Resumo: The dry forests, widely distributed in Brazil, are formations subject to different sampling method. Consequently, the data generated may affect the comparison among other vegetation formations. Therefore, this study presents and discusses changes caused by sampling vegetation using circumference at soil height (CSH) ≥ 10 cm and circumference at breast height (CBH) ≥ 15 cm. Different criteria provide an ambiguous vision of a same forest fragment, resulting in different structure and species richness.
id EMBRAPA-5_86d3feaebbf0efc87f5c22803b264274
oai_identifier_str oai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/380
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-5
network_name_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forestDiferentes critérios de inclusão amostral e suas interpretações: estudo de caso em floresta estacional decidualFitossociologiaMétodos de amostragemMata SecaCaatinga ArbóreaPhytosociologySampling methodologySeasonally Tropical Dry ForestArboreal CaatingaThe dry forests, widely distributed in Brazil, are formations subject to different sampling method. Consequently, the data generated may affect the comparison among other vegetation formations. Therefore, this study presents and discusses changes caused by sampling vegetation using circumference at soil height (CSH) ≥ 10 cm and circumference at breast height (CBH) ≥ 15 cm. Different criteria provide an ambiguous vision of a same forest fragment, resulting in different structure and species richness.As florestas estacionais deciduais (FEDs), amplamente distribuídas no Brasil, são formações sujeitas a diferentes métodos de inventários. Consequentemente, os dados gerados podem afetar a comparação com outras formações vegetais. Este estudo apresenta e discute alterações proporcionadas pela amostragem da vegetação utilizando circunferência ao nível do solo (CNS) ≥ 10 cm e circunferência à altura do peito (CAP) ≥ 15 cm, em fragmentos de FED. O uso de diferentes critérios proporciona uma visão ambígua de um mesmo fragmento florestal, manifestada pelas diferenças em sua estrutura horizontal e riqueza de espécies.Embrapa Florestas2012-12-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/38010.4336/2012.pfb.32.72.471Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 32 n. 72 (2012): out./dez.; 471Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 32 No. 72 (2012): out./dez.; 4711983-26051809-3647reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/380/pdf_22Arruda, Daniel MeiraBatista, Márcio LuizSimão, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de CastroDuque-Brasil, ReinaldoFerreira-Júnior, Walnir GomesSchaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynaldinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-04-28T12:55:53Zoai:pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb:article/380Revistahttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/PUBhttps://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/oaipfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br1983-26051809-3647opendoar:2017-04-28T12:55:53Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
Diferentes critérios de inclusão amostral e suas interpretações: estudo de caso em floresta estacional decidual
title Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
spellingShingle Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
Arruda, Daniel Meira
Fitossociologia
Métodos de amostragem
Mata Seca
Caatinga Arbórea
Phytosociology
Sampling methodology
Seasonally Tropical Dry Forest
Arboreal Caatinga
title_short Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
title_full Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
title_fullStr Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
title_full_unstemmed Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
title_sort Different sizes of the smallest individual sampled and their interpretations: case study in the seasonally dry forest
author Arruda, Daniel Meira
author_facet Arruda, Daniel Meira
Batista, Márcio Luiz
Simão, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de Castro
Duque-Brasil, Reinaldo
Ferreira-Júnior, Walnir Gomes
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynald
author_role author
author2 Batista, Márcio Luiz
Simão, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de Castro
Duque-Brasil, Reinaldo
Ferreira-Júnior, Walnir Gomes
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynald
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Arruda, Daniel Meira
Batista, Márcio Luiz
Simão, Marcos Vinicius Ribeiro de Castro
Duque-Brasil, Reinaldo
Ferreira-Júnior, Walnir Gomes
Schaefer, Carlos Ernesto Gonçalves Reynald
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fitossociologia
Métodos de amostragem
Mata Seca
Caatinga Arbórea
Phytosociology
Sampling methodology
Seasonally Tropical Dry Forest
Arboreal Caatinga
topic Fitossociologia
Métodos de amostragem
Mata Seca
Caatinga Arbórea
Phytosociology
Sampling methodology
Seasonally Tropical Dry Forest
Arboreal Caatinga
description The dry forests, widely distributed in Brazil, are formations subject to different sampling method. Consequently, the data generated may affect the comparison among other vegetation formations. Therefore, this study presents and discusses changes caused by sampling vegetation using circumference at soil height (CSH) ≥ 10 cm and circumference at breast height (CBH) ≥ 15 cm. Different criteria provide an ambiguous vision of a same forest fragment, resulting in different structure and species richness.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-12-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/380
10.4336/2012.pfb.32.72.471
url https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/380
identifier_str_mv 10.4336/2012.pfb.32.72.471
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/380/pdf_22
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Embrapa Florestas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; v. 32 n. 72 (2012): out./dez.; 471
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira; Vol. 32 No. 72 (2012): out./dez.; 471
1983-2605
1809-3647
reponame:Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pfb@embrapa.br || revista.pfb@gmail.com || patricia.mattos@embrapa.br
_version_ 1783370933598158848