Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: GAMARRA, E. L.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: MORAIS, M. da G., ALMEIDA, R. G. de, PALUDETTO, N. A., PEREIRA, M., OLIVEIRA, C. C. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1080620
Resumo: The aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the system (with trees) most appropriate for beef cattle production. Despite the shading interference on forage production, such condition is compensated by the best nutritional contents such as CP. The ICLF2 system allowing an annual LWG of 83% in relation to the ICL system during the fifth year of establishment of the systems.
id EMBR_10ef0efa43f63d02f545077b93b0a1ad
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1080620
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.Tree densityIntegração lavoura-pecuária-florestaCapim-piatãDensidade de árvoreProdução de forragemEucaliptoEucalyptusForage yieldThe aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the system (with trees) most appropriate for beef cattle production. Despite the shading interference on forage production, such condition is compensated by the best nutritional contents such as CP. The ICLF2 system allowing an annual LWG of 83% in relation to the ICL system during the fifth year of establishment of the systems.Título em português: Produção de bovinos de corte em sistemas de integração estabelecidos.Érick Lemes Gamarra, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - FAMEZ/ Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMSMaria da Graça Morais, Prof., UFMS/FAMEZ, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência AnimalROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGCNatália Aguiar Paludetto, Analista Instrumental/Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente, SEMMAMariana Pereira, FAMEZ/UFMSCaroline Carvalho de Oliveira, Discente de Doutorado em Ciência Animal, FAMEZ/UFMS.GAMARRA, E. L.MORAIS, M. da G.ALMEIDA, R. G. dePALUDETTO, N. A.PEREIRA, M.OLIVEIRA, C. C. de2017-11-23T23:22:58Z2017-11-23T23:22:58Z2017-11-2320172017-11-23T23:22:58Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleSemina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 38, n. 5, p. 3241-3252, set./out. 2017.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1080620enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2017-11-23T23:23:05Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1080620Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542017-11-23T23:23:05falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542017-11-23T23:23:05Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
title Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
spellingShingle Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
GAMARRA, E. L.
Tree density
Integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta
Capim-piatã
Densidade de árvore
Produção de forragem
Eucalipto
Eucalyptus
Forage yield
title_short Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
title_full Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
title_fullStr Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
title_full_unstemmed Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
title_sort Beef cattle production in established integrated systems.
author GAMARRA, E. L.
author_facet GAMARRA, E. L.
MORAIS, M. da G.
ALMEIDA, R. G. de
PALUDETTO, N. A.
PEREIRA, M.
OLIVEIRA, C. C. de
author_role author
author2 MORAIS, M. da G.
ALMEIDA, R. G. de
PALUDETTO, N. A.
PEREIRA, M.
OLIVEIRA, C. C. de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Érick Lemes Gamarra, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - FAMEZ/ Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul - UFMS
Maria da Graça Morais, Prof., UFMS/FAMEZ, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Animal
ROBERTO GIOLO DE ALMEIDA, CNPGC
Natália Aguiar Paludetto, Analista Instrumental/Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente, SEMMA
Mariana Pereira, FAMEZ/UFMS
Caroline Carvalho de Oliveira, Discente de Doutorado em Ciência Animal, FAMEZ/UFMS.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv GAMARRA, E. L.
MORAIS, M. da G.
ALMEIDA, R. G. de
PALUDETTO, N. A.
PEREIRA, M.
OLIVEIRA, C. C. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Tree density
Integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta
Capim-piatã
Densidade de árvore
Produção de forragem
Eucalipto
Eucalyptus
Forage yield
topic Tree density
Integração lavoura-pecuária-floresta
Capim-piatã
Densidade de árvore
Produção de forragem
Eucalipto
Eucalyptus
Forage yield
description The aim of the current study is to assess three integrated systems presenting different eucalyptus tree densities due to animal and forage production. The following integrated systems were assessed: croplivestock- forest with 357 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF1); crop-livestock-forest with 227 eucalyptus trees ha-1 (ICLF2); and crop-livestock with 5 remnant native trees ha-1 (ICL). The randomized block experimental design was applied in a split-plot scheme with four replicates. The Average Daily Gain (ADG, g animal-1day-1) and the live-weight gain per area (LWG, kg ha-1) were applied to analyze animal performance, which was set by weighing the animals every 28 days (the animals previously fasted for 16h). Forage yield was higher in ICL during fall and winter; in summer, it did not differ from ICLF2. There was no forage yield difference between the ICL and ICLF2 systems in any of the assessed seasons; summer was more productive in ILPF1 than other seasons. The highest leaf crude protein contents (CP) in summer was recorded in systems ICLF1 and ICLF2, and the highest value recorded in fall was found in ILPF1; the lowest was found in ILP. On the other hand, the highest leaf NDF contents in summer were found in ILP. The highest ADG were found in summer. The highest LWG values recorded for the ICL and ICLF2 systems were collected in summer and fall; there was no difference in any of the three systems in winter. The LWG was higher in all system in summer. The ICLF2 emerged as the system (with trees) most appropriate for beef cattle production. Despite the shading interference on forage production, such condition is compensated by the best nutritional contents such as CP. The ICLF2 system allowing an annual LWG of 83% in relation to the ICL system during the fifth year of establishment of the systems.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11-23T23:22:58Z
2017-11-23T23:22:58Z
2017-11-23
2017
2017-11-23T23:22:58Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 38, n. 5, p. 3241-3252, set./out. 2017.
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1080620
identifier_str_mv Semina: Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 38, n. 5, p. 3241-3252, set./out. 2017.
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1080620
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1794503445140471808