Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129849 |
Resumo: | The use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season. |
id |
EMBR_9bd5a15622ec57d33d253371a64da47d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1129849 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBR |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository_id_str |
2154 |
spelling |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides.Brassica napus L var oleiferaAnticipation of harvestSeed qualityThe use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.THALITA PEDROZO PILLA, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim ZIP CODE: 99700 000, Erechim, Rio Grande do Su l, Brazil; LEANDRO GALON, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; DAIANI BRANDLER, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; FELIPE BIANCHESE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; RODRIGO JOSÉ TONIN, Dept. of Agronomy , The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; JOSIEL RICARDO TONI, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira S ul UFFS, Campus Erechim; CESAR TIAGO FORTE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; LEANDRO VARGAS, CNPT.PILLA, T. P.GALON, L.BRANDLER, DAIANI.BIANCHESE, F.TONIN, R. J.TONI, J. R.FORTE, C. T.VARGAS, L.2021-02-08T14:19:21Z2021-02-08T14:19:21Z2021-02-082020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleJournal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020.http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129849enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2021-02-08T14:19:29Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1129849Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestopendoar:21542021-02-08T14:19:29falseRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542021-02-08T14:19:29Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
title |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
spellingShingle |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. PILLA, T. P. Brassica napus L var oleifera Anticipation of harvest Seed quality |
title_short |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
title_full |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
title_fullStr |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
title_sort |
Physical, physiological and sanitary quality of canola seeds after the application of maturing herbicides. |
author |
PILLA, T. P. |
author_facet |
PILLA, T. P. GALON, L. BRANDLER, DAIANI. BIANCHESE, F. TONIN, R. J. TONI, J. R. FORTE, C. T. VARGAS, L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
GALON, L. BRANDLER, DAIANI. BIANCHESE, F. TONIN, R. J. TONI, J. R. FORTE, C. T. VARGAS, L. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
THALITA PEDROZO PILLA, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim ZIP CODE: 99700 000, Erechim, Rio Grande do Su l, Brazil; LEANDRO GALON, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; DAIANI BRANDLER, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; FELIPE BIANCHESE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; RODRIGO JOSÉ TONIN, Dept. of Agronomy , The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; JOSIEL RICARDO TONI, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira S ul UFFS, Campus Erechim; CESAR TIAGO FORTE, Dept. of Agronomy, The Federal University of Fronteira Sul UFFS, Campus Erechim; LEANDRO VARGAS, CNPT. |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
PILLA, T. P. GALON, L. BRANDLER, DAIANI. BIANCHESE, F. TONIN, R. J. TONI, J. R. FORTE, C. T. VARGAS, L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brassica napus L var oleifera Anticipation of harvest Seed quality |
topic |
Brassica napus L var oleifera Anticipation of harvest Seed quality |
description |
The use of herbicides to anticipate harvesting in species with easy seed dehiscence may be an alternative to avoid maturation losses. However, the appropriate time for herbicide application is extremely important as it prevents the seeds from remaining in the field for long periods. The objective of this study was to evalu ate the efficiency of the application of maturing herbicides in two distinct seasons, and their effects on the physical, physiological, and sanitary quality of canola seeds. A randomized block experimental design arranged in a factorial scheme (herbicide x season + control) with four replications was used. Hybrid 50 canola plants were matured with the herbicides: glufosinate, paraquat, glyphosate, diquat, saflufenacil, 2,4 D, and paraquat + diuron twice during the crop cycle, G3 and G4, and two controls wit hout applicati on for each epoch, with the first being harvested the day of product application, and the second kept in the field until the final crop cycle. Analyses of one thousand seed weight, electrical conductivity, emergence speed index, and a sanity test were performed. The application of maturing herbicides to canola increases the one thousand seed weight and rate of emergence speed. At the same time, it increases electrical conductivity and the incidence of ungi. Plants that remained in the field u ntil the end of the crop cycle and did not receive herbicide application resulted in higher quality seeds. The most appropriate moment to apply maturation herbicides to canola is in the G4 season.herbicides to canola is in the G4 season. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020 2021-02-08T14:19:21Z 2021-02-08T14:19:21Z 2021-02-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129849 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal Of Agricultural Studies, v. 8, p. 721-736, 2020. |
url |
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1129849 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cg-riaa@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1794503502343438336 |