Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753 |
Resumo: | The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years. |
id |
EPAGRI_ce3c8fc52a7e48a60e68c40c744bab8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/753 |
network_acronym_str |
EPAGRI |
network_name_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomatoMétodos de manejo e plantas de cobertura do solo para o cultivo do tomateiro tutoradoSolanum lycopersicum L.Avena strigosa Schreb.Raphanus sativus L.no-tillageconventional tillage.Solanum lycopersicum L.Avena strigosa Schreb.Raphanus sativus L.plantio diretoplantio convencionalThe objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years.O objetivo desse trabalho foi avaliar a influência de métodos de manejo e culturas de cobertura do solo de inverno na produtividade de tomateiro tutorado. Os tratamentos consistiram na combinação de dois métodos de plantio de tomate (convencional e direto) e quatro coberturas de solo de inverno (pousio, aveia, nabo e aveia+nabo). Avaliou-se o teor de nitrogênio (N), a relação C/N, a massa seca e o acúmulo de N na parte aérea de plantas de cobertura de solo, bem como a produtividade do tomate, nas safras 2009/10 e 2011/12. Ao final da safra foi determinada a resistência mecânica à penetração do solo usando um penetrômetro de impacto. As espécies de cobertura do solo e os métodos de preparo para a semeadura não afetaram a produção de massa seca e N total das plantas de cobertura, sendo que apenas na safra 2011/12 o consórcio aveia+nabo apresentou maior teor de N do que a aveia, com redução da relação C/N. Maior produtividade comercial de tomate foi observada no plantio convencional (79,2 x 65,3 ton ha-1) na safra 2009/10, na qual o sistema de plantio direto apresentou maior resistência do solo ao teste do penetrômetro. Na safra 2011/12 a produtividade comercial foi maior no plantio direto (102,8 x 97,3 ton ha-1). As coberturas de solo com aveia e nabo, em cultivo consorciado ou solteiro, bem como o pousio invernal, não afetaram a produtividade comercial de tomate em nenhuma das safras estudadas. Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/75310.52945/rac.v33i2.753Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 76-81Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 76-812525-60760103-0779reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online)instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)instacron:EPAGRIporhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753/942Copyright (c) 2020 Autoreshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValmorbida, JaniceWamser, Anderson FernandoSantin, Bruna LuisaEnder, Marcos2020-11-13T01:15:35Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br:article/753Revistahttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/RAC/indexPUBhttps://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/RAC/oaieditoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br2525-60760103-0779opendoar:2020-11-13T01:15:35Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato Métodos de manejo e plantas de cobertura do solo para o cultivo do tomateiro tutorado |
title |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
spellingShingle |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato Valmorbida, Janice Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. no-tillage conventional tillage. Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. plantio direto plantio convencional |
title_short |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
title_full |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
title_fullStr |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
title_sort |
Management methods and soil cover plants for the cultivation of tutored tomato |
author |
Valmorbida, Janice |
author_facet |
Valmorbida, Janice Wamser, Anderson Fernando Santin, Bruna Luisa Ender, Marcos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Wamser, Anderson Fernando Santin, Bruna Luisa Ender, Marcos |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valmorbida, Janice Wamser, Anderson Fernando Santin, Bruna Luisa Ender, Marcos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. no-tillage conventional tillage. Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. plantio direto plantio convencional |
topic |
Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. no-tillage conventional tillage. Solanum lycopersicum L. Avena strigosa Schreb. Raphanus sativus L. plantio direto plantio convencional |
description |
The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of management methods and winter soil cover crops on the tutored tomato yield. The treatments consisted of a combination of two planting methods (conventional and no-tillage) and four winter soil coverings (fallow, oats, turnip and oats + turnip). The nitrogen content (N), the C/N ratio, the dry mass and the N accumulation in the aerial part of the cover plants were evaluated, as well as the tomato yield, in the 2009/10 and 2011/12 harvests. At the end of the harvest, the mechanical resistance to soil penetration was determined using an impact penetrometer. The species of cover plants and the methods of soil preparation did not affect the production of dry mass and total N of the cover plants, with a higher N content for the oat + turnip consortium than for oats, with reduction of C/N ratio, only in 2011/12. Higher commercial tomato yield was observed in conventional planting (79.2 x 65.3t ha-1) in the 2009/10 harvest, in which the no-tillage system presented greater soil resistance to the penetrometer test. In the 2011/12 harvest, the commercial yield was higher in no-till (102.8 x 97.3t ha-1). The coverings of soil with oats and turnip, in intercropped or single cultivation, as well as the winter fallow, did not affect the commercial tomato yield in any of the studied years. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753 10.52945/rac.v33i2.753 |
url |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.52945/rac.v33i2.753 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.epagri.sc.gov.br/rac/article/view/753/942 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Autores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Autores https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina - Epagri |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense Journal; Vol. 33 No. 2 (2020); 76-81 Agropecuária Catarinense; v. 33 n. 2 (2020); 76-81 2525-6076 0103-0779 reponame:Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) instname:Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) instacron:EPAGRI |
instname_str |
Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
instacron_str |
EPAGRI |
institution |
EPAGRI |
reponame_str |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
collection |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agropecuária Catarinense (Online) - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina (Epagri) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editoriarac@epagri.sc.gov.br || lamperuch@epagri.sc.gov.br |
_version_ |
1754917259853168640 |