PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Isabella Fonseca
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Esmat
Texto Completo: http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209
Resumo: The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects.
id ESMAT_f9b96a6a6236bcc5b421255158f7614d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/209
network_acronym_str ESMAT
network_name_str Revista Esmat
repository_id_str
spelling PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015TÉCNICA PROCESSUAL E FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DAS DECISÕES NO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL DE 2015The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects.O presente artigo objetiva apresentar a importância da técnica processual para a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015. O procedimento metodológico utilizado consistiu na revisão bibliográfica acerca da técnica processual, dos princípios constitucionais do contraditório e da fundamentação das decisões, bem como do Código de Processo Civil. A proposta de desenvolver um estudo sobre a contribuição da técnica processual para a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, teve como motivação a visualização da participação das partes para a construção de uma decisão sem que o solipsismo do julgador seja o referente decisório. A noção de contraditório como garantia de influência e não surpresa e a sua interligação com a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, vedam que o monopólio interpretativo-decisório ainda esteja na mão do Estado-Juiz sem observar os elementos técnicos e garantias processuais constitucionais. Atingido esse objetivo foi possível analisar a cooperação processual no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, e demonstrar que a decisão de saneamento e organização serve como filtro para a fundamentação, de modo a permitir um ambiente dialógico em contraditório dos sujeitos processuais.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2018-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/20910.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 9 No. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82REVISTA ESMAT; v. 9 n. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-822447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v9i14reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209/193Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Isabella FonsecaMundim, Luís Gustavo Reis2021-10-28T04:28:17Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/209Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:28:17Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
TÉCNICA PROCESSUAL E FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DAS DECISÕES NO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL DE 2015
title PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
spellingShingle PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
Alves, Isabella Fonseca
title_short PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
title_full PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
title_fullStr PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
title_full_unstemmed PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
title_sort PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
author Alves, Isabella Fonseca
author_facet Alves, Isabella Fonseca
Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis
author_role author
author2 Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Isabella Fonseca
Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis
description The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209
10.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209
url http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209
identifier_str_mv 10.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209/193
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 9 No. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82
REVISTA ESMAT; v. 9 n. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82
2447-9896
2177-0360
10.34060/reesmat.v9i14
reponame:Revista Esmat
instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron:ESMAT
instname_str Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
instacron_str ESMAT
institution ESMAT
reponame_str Revista Esmat
collection Revista Esmat
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br
_version_ 1809282622883364864