PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209 |
Resumo: | The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects. |
id |
ESMAT_f9b96a6a6236bcc5b421255158f7614d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/209 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015TÉCNICA PROCESSUAL E FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DAS DECISÕES NO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL DE 2015The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects.O presente artigo objetiva apresentar a importância da técnica processual para a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015. O procedimento metodológico utilizado consistiu na revisão bibliográfica acerca da técnica processual, dos princípios constitucionais do contraditório e da fundamentação das decisões, bem como do Código de Processo Civil. A proposta de desenvolver um estudo sobre a contribuição da técnica processual para a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, teve como motivação a visualização da participação das partes para a construção de uma decisão sem que o solipsismo do julgador seja o referente decisório. A noção de contraditório como garantia de influência e não surpresa e a sua interligação com a fundamentação das decisões no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, vedam que o monopólio interpretativo-decisório ainda esteja na mão do Estado-Juiz sem observar os elementos técnicos e garantias processuais constitucionais. Atingido esse objetivo foi possível analisar a cooperação processual no Código de Processo Civil, de 2015, e demonstrar que a decisão de saneamento e organização serve como filtro para a fundamentação, de modo a permitir um ambiente dialógico em contraditório dos sujeitos processuais.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2018-02-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/20910.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 9 No. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82REVISTA ESMAT; v. 9 n. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-822447-98962177-036010.34060/reesmat.v9i14reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209/193Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMATinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Isabella FonsecaMundim, Luís Gustavo Reis2021-10-28T04:28:17Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/209Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2021-10-28T04:28:17Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 TÉCNICA PROCESSUAL E FUNDAMENTAÇÃO DAS DECISÕES NO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL DE 2015 |
title |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
spellingShingle |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 Alves, Isabella Fonseca |
title_short |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
title_full |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
title_fullStr |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
title_full_unstemmed |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
title_sort |
PROCEDURAL TECHNIQUE AND FOUNDATION OF DECISIONS IN THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE OF 2015 |
author |
Alves, Isabella Fonseca |
author_facet |
Alves, Isabella Fonseca Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Alves, Isabella Fonseca Mundim, Luís Gustavo Reis |
description |
The present article aims to present the importance of the procedural technique for the reasoning of decisions in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015. The methodological procedure used consisted of a bibliographical review about the procedural technique, the constitutional principles of the contradictory and the reasoning of the decisions, as well as the Code of Civil Procedure. The proposal to develop a study on the contribution of the procedural technique to the basis of the decisions in the CPC/2015, was motivated the visualization of the participation of the parties to the construction of a decision without the solipsism of the judge being the referring one. The notion of contradictory as a guarantee of influence and not surprise and its interconnection with the grounds of decisions in CPC/2015 prohibits that the interpretative-decision-making monopoly is still in the hands of the State Judge without observing the technical elements and constitutional procedural guarantees. Once this objective was reached, it was possible to analyse the procedural cooperation in the CPC/2015 and to demonstrate that the sanitation and organization decision serves as a filter for the foundation, allowing a dialogical environment in contradictory of the procedural subjects. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209 10.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.34060/reesmat.v9i14.209 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/209/193 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 REVISTA ESMAT |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 9 No. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 9 n. 14 (2017): Edição Especial; 65-82 2447-9896 2177-0360 10.34060/reesmat.v9i14 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282622883364864 |