WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mioto, Ricardo de Paula
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo
Texto Completo: https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42
Resumo: This work has the purpose to study the Writ of Injunction, such as an instrument capable of accomplish constitutional rules pending regulatory. The study is carried out with a follow-up history of decisions made by the Supreme Federal Court, in which it is possible to see, at least, three evolutionary moments in the interpretation of this institute: the adoption of a theory not concretist movement, concretist movement intermediate and concretist movement individual and general. In this context, the text seeks to delimit what theory proves to be more compatible with what they wanted in 1988. In this regard, will be discussed and removed the obstacles constructed by a restrictive jurisprudence, who dominated the first years of the 1990s, especially the problem concerning the confrontation with the principle of separation of powers. In the end, the report presents an analysis of the reasons for the Supreme Court to adopt the recent and historic decisions that expanded the effectiveness of the instrument and what still has to evolve.
id ESMP-4_f78f646f90b89ada208e6cc78829d093
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42
network_acronym_str ESMP-4
network_name_str Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo
repository_id_str
spelling WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULESMANDADO DE INJUNÇÃO: INSTRUMENTO DE EFETIVIDADE DAS NORMAS CONSTITUCIONAISWrit of Injunction and the Supreme Federal CourtEffectivenessUnconstitutional OmissionsMandado de Injunção e o Supremo Tribunal FederalEfetividade. Omissões InconstitucionaisThis work has the purpose to study the Writ of Injunction, such as an instrument capable of accomplish constitutional rules pending regulatory. The study is carried out with a follow-up history of decisions made by the Supreme Federal Court, in which it is possible to see, at least, three evolutionary moments in the interpretation of this institute: the adoption of a theory not concretist movement, concretist movement intermediate and concretist movement individual and general. In this context, the text seeks to delimit what theory proves to be more compatible with what they wanted in 1988. In this regard, will be discussed and removed the obstacles constructed by a restrictive jurisprudence, who dominated the first years of the 1990s, especially the problem concerning the confrontation with the principle of separation of powers. In the end, the report presents an analysis of the reasons for the Supreme Court to adopt the recent and historic decisions that expanded the effectiveness of the instrument and what still has to evolve.Este trabalho tem por finalidade o estudo do Mandado de Injunção, como instrumento capaz de efetivar normas constitucionais pendentes de regulamentação. O estudo é realizado com um acompanhamento histórico das decisões proferidas pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal, em que é possível visualizar, no mínimo, três momentos evolutivos na interpretação desse instituto: a adoção de uma teoria não concretista, concretista intermediária e concretista individual e geral. Nesse contexto, o texto busca delimitar qual teoria se mostra mais compatível com aquilo que se pretendeu em 1988. Nesse propósito, serão debatidos e afastados os obstáculos construídos por uma jurisprudência restritiva, que dominou os primeiros anos da década de 90, especialmente o problema relativo ao confronto com o princípio da separação de poderes. Ao final, apresenta-se uma análise dos motivos que determinaram a Suprema Corte a adotar as recentes e históricas decisões que ampliaram a efetividade desse instrumento e o que ainda tem para evoluir.Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público2012-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo; v. 2 (2012); 85-1092316-69592238-4847reponame:Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Pauloinstname:Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)instacron:ESMPporhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42/25Mioto, Ricardo de Paulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:54:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/42Revistahttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/indexPUBhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/oaiesmp_revista@mpsp.mp.br2316-69592238-4847opendoar:2024-03-06T15:54:08Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo - Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
MANDADO DE INJUNÇÃO: INSTRUMENTO DE EFETIVIDADE DAS NORMAS CONSTITUCIONAIS
title WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
spellingShingle WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
Mioto, Ricardo de Paula
Writ of Injunction and the Supreme Federal Court
Effectiveness
Unconstitutional Omissions
Mandado de Injunção e o Supremo Tribunal Federal
Efetividade. Omissões Inconstitucionais
title_short WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
title_full WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
title_fullStr WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
title_full_unstemmed WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
title_sort WRIT OF INJUNCTION: AN EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL RULES
author Mioto, Ricardo de Paula
author_facet Mioto, Ricardo de Paula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mioto, Ricardo de Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Writ of Injunction and the Supreme Federal Court
Effectiveness
Unconstitutional Omissions
Mandado de Injunção e o Supremo Tribunal Federal
Efetividade. Omissões Inconstitucionais
topic Writ of Injunction and the Supreme Federal Court
Effectiveness
Unconstitutional Omissions
Mandado de Injunção e o Supremo Tribunal Federal
Efetividade. Omissões Inconstitucionais
description This work has the purpose to study the Writ of Injunction, such as an instrument capable of accomplish constitutional rules pending regulatory. The study is carried out with a follow-up history of decisions made by the Supreme Federal Court, in which it is possible to see, at least, three evolutionary moments in the interpretation of this institute: the adoption of a theory not concretist movement, concretist movement intermediate and concretist movement individual and general. In this context, the text seeks to delimit what theory proves to be more compatible with what they wanted in 1988. In this regard, will be discussed and removed the obstacles constructed by a restrictive jurisprudence, who dominated the first years of the 1990s, especially the problem concerning the confrontation with the principle of separation of powers. In the end, the report presents an analysis of the reasons for the Supreme Court to adopt the recent and historic decisions that expanded the effectiveness of the instrument and what still has to evolve.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-11-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42
url https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/42/25
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo; v. 2 (2012); 85-109
2316-6959
2238-4847
reponame:Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo
instname:Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)
instacron:ESMP
instname_str Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)
instacron_str ESMP
institution ESMP
reponame_str Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo
collection Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo - Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv esmp_revista@mpsp.mp.br
_version_ 1793890288071081984

Registros relacionados