Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Furtado, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Martin, Natália Roberta, Manzini, Régis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/187
Resumo: Introduction: In the context of implantology and severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and the procedures can be completed with the placement of a custom-made provisional prosthesis, reducing surgical time and optimizing results. Digital (virtual) optimizations for the ZI were developed in computerized radiology machines that allowed improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Objective: It was carried out a systematic review of the main considerations and clinical outcomes of using digital tools for the optimization of the virtual zygomatic implant. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from January 2022 to April 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 94 articles were found. In total, 62 articles were fully evaluated and 41 were included and evaluated in this study, and of the total of 41 articles, only 14 articles were developed as the main clinical results of the virtual zygomatic implant. Reducing errors and complications is essential if zygomatic implants are to remain a viable treatment alternative, and further research on a guided approach to their placement is encouraged. The surgical guide system showed accuracy for all variables studied and allowed acceptable and accurate implant placement, regardless of the complexity of the case. Thus, the surgical and prosthetic plan, the position, the emergence, the shape of the implants, the position of the provisional prosthesis, the inter-arch relationships, and the surgical templates were designed in a virtual environment and previously performed by the surgeon in stereolithographic models, allowing the surgical procedure was significantly simplified.
id FACERES-1_0cebf35ce0ed1a30417662ba9085d196
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/187
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic reviewZygomatic implantVirtual zygomatic implantQuad zygomatic implantClinical trialsIntroduction: In the context of implantology and severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and the procedures can be completed with the placement of a custom-made provisional prosthesis, reducing surgical time and optimizing results. Digital (virtual) optimizations for the ZI were developed in computerized radiology machines that allowed improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Objective: It was carried out a systematic review of the main considerations and clinical outcomes of using digital tools for the optimization of the virtual zygomatic implant. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from January 2022 to April 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 94 articles were found. In total, 62 articles were fully evaluated and 41 were included and evaluated in this study, and of the total of 41 articles, only 14 articles were developed as the main clinical results of the virtual zygomatic implant. Reducing errors and complications is essential if zygomatic implants are to remain a viable treatment alternative, and further research on a guided approach to their placement is encouraged. The surgical guide system showed accuracy for all variables studied and allowed acceptable and accurate implant placement, regardless of the complexity of the case. Thus, the surgical and prosthetic plan, the position, the emergence, the shape of the implants, the position of the provisional prosthesis, the inter-arch relationships, and the surgical templates were designed in a virtual environment and previously performed by the surgeon in stereolithographic models, allowing the surgical procedure was significantly simplified.Faceres2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/18710.54448/mdnt22S319MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 20222763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/187/176Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFurtado, LucasMartin, Natália RobertaManzini, Régis2022-06-01T14:08:39Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/187Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-06-01T14:08:39MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
title Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
spellingShingle Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
Furtado, Lucas
Zygomatic implant
Virtual zygomatic implant
Quad zygomatic implant
Clinical trials
title_short Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
title_full Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
title_fullStr Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
title_sort Major clinical results of virtual zygomatic implant and assessment of the risk of bias: a systematic review
author Furtado, Lucas
author_facet Furtado, Lucas
Martin, Natália Roberta
Manzini, Régis
author_role author
author2 Martin, Natália Roberta
Manzini, Régis
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Furtado, Lucas
Martin, Natália Roberta
Manzini, Régis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Zygomatic implant
Virtual zygomatic implant
Quad zygomatic implant
Clinical trials
topic Zygomatic implant
Virtual zygomatic implant
Quad zygomatic implant
Clinical trials
description Introduction: In the context of implantology and severe resorption, zygomatic implants (ZI) are indicated and the procedures can be completed with the placement of a custom-made provisional prosthesis, reducing surgical time and optimizing results. Digital (virtual) optimizations for the ZI were developed in computerized radiology machines that allowed improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Objective: It was carried out a systematic review of the main considerations and clinical outcomes of using digital tools for the optimization of the virtual zygomatic implant. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review-PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from January 2022 to April 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 94 articles were found. In total, 62 articles were fully evaluated and 41 were included and evaluated in this study, and of the total of 41 articles, only 14 articles were developed as the main clinical results of the virtual zygomatic implant. Reducing errors and complications is essential if zygomatic implants are to remain a viable treatment alternative, and further research on a guided approach to their placement is encouraged. The surgical guide system showed accuracy for all variables studied and allowed acceptable and accurate implant placement, regardless of the complexity of the case. Thus, the surgical and prosthetic plan, the position, the emergence, the shape of the implants, the position of the provisional prosthesis, the inter-arch relationships, and the surgical templates were designed in a virtual environment and previously performed by the surgeon in stereolithographic models, allowing the surgical procedure was significantly simplified.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/187
10.54448/mdnt22S319
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/187
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22S319
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/187/176
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
2763-5678
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798220025724928