Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alvarenga, Giulia Viana, Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona, Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa, Tempest, Leandro Moreira, Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Texto Completo: https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164
Resumo: Introduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy.
id FACERES-1_e2e66aeb89fe03866dfa82cc7f73d42e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/164
network_acronym_str FACERES-1
network_name_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic reviewMetal postsFiberglass postsIntra-radicular postsRemoval TechniquesAestheticsRemoval metal postsIntroduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy.Faceres2022-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/16410.54448/mdnt22S302MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 20222763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164/154Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Débora Stefanini deAlvarenga, Giulia VianaBossa, Carla Roberta PamplonaMaluf, Ana Paula Bernardes RosaTempest, Leandro MoreiraBuchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves2022-05-12T13:53:36Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/164Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-05-12T13:53:36MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
title Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
spellingShingle Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de
Metal posts
Fiberglass posts
Intra-radicular posts
Removal Techniques
Aesthetics
Removal metal posts
title_short Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
title_full Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
title_sort Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
author Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de
author_facet Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de
Alvarenga, Giulia Viana
Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona
Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa
Tempest, Leandro Moreira
Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves
author_role author
author2 Alvarenga, Giulia Viana
Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona
Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa
Tempest, Leandro Moreira
Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de
Alvarenga, Giulia Viana
Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona
Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa
Tempest, Leandro Moreira
Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Metal posts
Fiberglass posts
Intra-radicular posts
Removal Techniques
Aesthetics
Removal metal posts
topic Metal posts
Fiberglass posts
Intra-radicular posts
Removal Techniques
Aesthetics
Removal metal posts
description Introduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164
10.54448/mdnt22S302
url https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164
identifier_str_mv 10.54448/mdnt22S302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164/154
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faceres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022
2763-5678
reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron:FACERES
instname_str Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
instacron_str FACERES
institution FACERES
reponame_str MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
collection MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com
_version_ 1796798219975393280