Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164 |
Resumo: | Introduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy. |
id |
FACERES-1_e2e66aeb89fe03866dfa82cc7f73d42e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/164 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic reviewMetal postsFiberglass postsIntra-radicular postsRemoval TechniquesAestheticsRemoval metal postsIntroduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy.Faceres2022-05-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/16410.54448/mdnt22S302MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 20222763-5678reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164/154Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Scienceshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Débora Stefanini deAlvarenga, Giulia VianaBossa, Carla Roberta PamplonaMaluf, Ana Paula Bernardes RosaTempest, Leandro MoreiraBuchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves2022-05-12T13:53:36Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/164Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2022-05-12T13:53:36MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
title |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de Metal posts Fiberglass posts Intra-radicular posts Removal Techniques Aesthetics Removal metal posts |
title_short |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
title_full |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
title_sort |
Clinical approaches and removal of cast metallic posts for their replacement by the fiberglass posts: a concise systematic review |
author |
Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de Alvarenga, Giulia Viana Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa Tempest, Leandro Moreira Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvarenga, Giulia Viana Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa Tempest, Leandro Moreira Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Débora Stefanini de Alvarenga, Giulia Viana Bossa, Carla Roberta Pamplona Maluf, Ana Paula Bernardes Rosa Tempest, Leandro Moreira Buchala, Carlos Alberto Costa Neves |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Metal posts Fiberglass posts Intra-radicular posts Removal Techniques Aesthetics Removal metal posts |
topic |
Metal posts Fiberglass posts Intra-radicular posts Removal Techniques Aesthetics Removal metal posts |
description |
Introduction: A successful placement of an intraradicular post needs a good endodontic treatment. Consideration should also be given to the possibility of its future removal. Authors have shown that approximately 10% of cases of teeth indicated for endodontic retreatment require removal of intraradicular posts. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review to analyze the reasons for replacing intraradicular posts, the most effective and used techniques for removing the metallic post, the manufacture of the fiberglass post, and the difference between the two types of posts. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Results and Conclusion: A total of 112 articles were found. A total of 56 articles were fully evaluated and 18 were included in this study. Based on the objective and results found in the present study, the review demonstrated the main advantages and disadvantages of the clinical performance of cast metal posts and fiberglass posts, as well as the reason for switching from metal to fiberglass posts. Despite the wear caused by endodontic treatment, it is important to check the remaining dentin to choose the best retainer, observing the amount of this remaining structure, as it directly influences the selection of the post. Regarding the removal of the metallic pin, wear, ultrasound, and seizure/removal with some traction device are used. The replacement of the metallic post can opt for fiberglass posts because they have a greater advantage compared to the metallic post, mainly for aesthetics, the manufacturing technique is more agile, they do not generate risks of root fracture and if, for any eventuality, it needs to be removed. to portray the channel, the technique is smooth and easy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164 10.54448/mdnt22S302 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt22S302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/164/154 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faceres |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 3 No. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 3 n. S3 (2022): MedNEXT - Supplement 3 - June 2022 2763-5678 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1796798219975393280 |